Michael Taylor, Carlos Areia, Kath Burton, Charles Watkinson
{"title":"研究引用建立对维基百科的信任","authors":"Michael Taylor, Carlos Areia, Kath Burton, Charles Watkinson","doi":"arxiv-2409.11948","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The use of Wikipedia citations in scholarly research has been the topic of\nmuch inquiry over the past decade. A cross-publisher study (Taylor & Francis\nand University of Michigan Press) convened by Digital Science was established\nin late 2022 to explore author sentiment towards Wikipedia as a trusted source\nof information. A short survey was designed to poll published authors about\nviews and uses of Wikipedia and explore how the increased addition of research\ncitations in Wikipedia might help combat misinformation in the context of\nincreasing public engagement with and access to validated research sources.\nWith 21,854 surveys sent, targeting 40,402 papers mentioned in Wikipedia, a\ntotal of 750 complete surveys from 60 countries were included in this analysis.\nIn general, responses revealed a positive sentiment towards research citation\nin Wikipedia and the researcher engagement practices. However, our sub analysis\nrevealed statistically significant differences when comparison articles vs\nbooks and across disciplines, but not open vs closed access. This study will\nopen the door to further research and deepen our understanding of authors\nperceived trustworthiness of the representation of their research in Wikipedia.","PeriodicalId":501285,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - CS - Digital Libraries","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Research Citations Building Trust in Wikipedia\",\"authors\":\"Michael Taylor, Carlos Areia, Kath Burton, Charles Watkinson\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2409.11948\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The use of Wikipedia citations in scholarly research has been the topic of\\nmuch inquiry over the past decade. A cross-publisher study (Taylor & Francis\\nand University of Michigan Press) convened by Digital Science was established\\nin late 2022 to explore author sentiment towards Wikipedia as a trusted source\\nof information. A short survey was designed to poll published authors about\\nviews and uses of Wikipedia and explore how the increased addition of research\\ncitations in Wikipedia might help combat misinformation in the context of\\nincreasing public engagement with and access to validated research sources.\\nWith 21,854 surveys sent, targeting 40,402 papers mentioned in Wikipedia, a\\ntotal of 750 complete surveys from 60 countries were included in this analysis.\\nIn general, responses revealed a positive sentiment towards research citation\\nin Wikipedia and the researcher engagement practices. However, our sub analysis\\nrevealed statistically significant differences when comparison articles vs\\nbooks and across disciplines, but not open vs closed access. This study will\\nopen the door to further research and deepen our understanding of authors\\nperceived trustworthiness of the representation of their research in Wikipedia.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501285,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - CS - Digital Libraries\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - CS - Digital Libraries\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.11948\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - CS - Digital Libraries","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.11948","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The use of Wikipedia citations in scholarly research has been the topic of
much inquiry over the past decade. A cross-publisher study (Taylor & Francis
and University of Michigan Press) convened by Digital Science was established
in late 2022 to explore author sentiment towards Wikipedia as a trusted source
of information. A short survey was designed to poll published authors about
views and uses of Wikipedia and explore how the increased addition of research
citations in Wikipedia might help combat misinformation in the context of
increasing public engagement with and access to validated research sources.
With 21,854 surveys sent, targeting 40,402 papers mentioned in Wikipedia, a
total of 750 complete surveys from 60 countries were included in this analysis.
In general, responses revealed a positive sentiment towards research citation
in Wikipedia and the researcher engagement practices. However, our sub analysis
revealed statistically significant differences when comparison articles vs
books and across disciplines, but not open vs closed access. This study will
open the door to further research and deepen our understanding of authors
perceived trustworthiness of the representation of their research in Wikipedia.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
