{"title":"蛋白质组数据与基因组尺度代谢模型的整合:方法概述","authors":"Farid Zare, Ronan M. T. Fleming","doi":"10.1002/pro.5150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The integration of proteomics data with constraint‐based reconstruction and analysis (COBRA) models plays a pivotal role in understanding the relationship between genotype and phenotype and bridges the gap between genome‐level phenomena and functional adaptations. Integrating a generic genome‐scale model with information on proteins enables generation of a context‐specific metabolic model which improves the accuracy of model prediction. This review explores methodologies for incorporating proteomics data into genome‐scale models. Available methods are grouped into four distinct categories based on their approach to integrate proteomics data and their depth of modeling. Within each category section various methods are introduced in chronological order of publication demonstrating the progress of this field. Furthermore, challenges and potential solutions to further progress are outlined, including the limited availability of appropriate in vitro data, experimental enzyme turnover rates, and the trade‐off between model accuracy, computational tractability, and data scarcity. In conclusion, methods employing simpler approaches demand fewer kinetic and omics data, consequently leading to a less complex mathematical problem and reduced computational expenses. On the other hand, approaches that delve deeper into cellular mechanisms and aim to create detailed mathematical models necessitate more extensive kinetic and omics data, resulting in a more complex and computationally demanding problem. However, in some cases, this increased cost can be justified by the potential for more precise predictions.","PeriodicalId":20761,"journal":{"name":"Protein Science","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Integration of proteomic data with genome‐scale metabolic models: A methodological overview\",\"authors\":\"Farid Zare, Ronan M. T. Fleming\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/pro.5150\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The integration of proteomics data with constraint‐based reconstruction and analysis (COBRA) models plays a pivotal role in understanding the relationship between genotype and phenotype and bridges the gap between genome‐level phenomena and functional adaptations. Integrating a generic genome‐scale model with information on proteins enables generation of a context‐specific metabolic model which improves the accuracy of model prediction. This review explores methodologies for incorporating proteomics data into genome‐scale models. Available methods are grouped into four distinct categories based on their approach to integrate proteomics data and their depth of modeling. Within each category section various methods are introduced in chronological order of publication demonstrating the progress of this field. Furthermore, challenges and potential solutions to further progress are outlined, including the limited availability of appropriate in vitro data, experimental enzyme turnover rates, and the trade‐off between model accuracy, computational tractability, and data scarcity. In conclusion, methods employing simpler approaches demand fewer kinetic and omics data, consequently leading to a less complex mathematical problem and reduced computational expenses. On the other hand, approaches that delve deeper into cellular mechanisms and aim to create detailed mathematical models necessitate more extensive kinetic and omics data, resulting in a more complex and computationally demanding problem. However, in some cases, this increased cost can be justified by the potential for more precise predictions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20761,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Protein Science\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Protein Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/pro.5150\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Protein Science","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pro.5150","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Integration of proteomic data with genome‐scale metabolic models: A methodological overview
The integration of proteomics data with constraint‐based reconstruction and analysis (COBRA) models plays a pivotal role in understanding the relationship between genotype and phenotype and bridges the gap between genome‐level phenomena and functional adaptations. Integrating a generic genome‐scale model with information on proteins enables generation of a context‐specific metabolic model which improves the accuracy of model prediction. This review explores methodologies for incorporating proteomics data into genome‐scale models. Available methods are grouped into four distinct categories based on their approach to integrate proteomics data and their depth of modeling. Within each category section various methods are introduced in chronological order of publication demonstrating the progress of this field. Furthermore, challenges and potential solutions to further progress are outlined, including the limited availability of appropriate in vitro data, experimental enzyme turnover rates, and the trade‐off between model accuracy, computational tractability, and data scarcity. In conclusion, methods employing simpler approaches demand fewer kinetic and omics data, consequently leading to a less complex mathematical problem and reduced computational expenses. On the other hand, approaches that delve deeper into cellular mechanisms and aim to create detailed mathematical models necessitate more extensive kinetic and omics data, resulting in a more complex and computationally demanding problem. However, in some cases, this increased cost can be justified by the potential for more precise predictions.
期刊介绍:
Protein Science, the flagship journal of The Protein Society, is a publication that focuses on advancing fundamental knowledge in the field of protein molecules. The journal welcomes original reports and review articles that contribute to our understanding of protein function, structure, folding, design, and evolution.
Additionally, Protein Science encourages papers that explore the applications of protein science in various areas such as therapeutics, protein-based biomaterials, bionanotechnology, synthetic biology, and bioelectronics.
The journal accepts manuscript submissions in any suitable format for review, with the requirement of converting the manuscript to journal-style format only upon acceptance for publication.
Protein Science is indexed and abstracted in numerous databases, including the Agricultural & Environmental Science Database (ProQuest), Biological Science Database (ProQuest), CAS: Chemical Abstracts Service (ACS), Embase (Elsevier), Health & Medical Collection (ProQuest), Health Research Premium Collection (ProQuest), Materials Science & Engineering Database (ProQuest), MEDLINE/PubMed (NLM), Natural Science Collection (ProQuest), and SciTech Premium Collection (ProQuest).