A new nomogram for the evaluation of detrusor underactivity and bladder outlet obstruction in nonneurogenic female patients with lower urinary tract symptoms who undergo urodynamic studies

IntroductionMicturition physiology differs in men and women. However, the results in standard urodynamic studies in women with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) were extrapolated from studies in men. Nowadays, the only validated nomogram for females is Solomon–Greenwell's. However, it only evaluated bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) without considering detrusor underactivity (DU). This study aims to create a nomogram that includes an evaluation of DU and BOO in nonneurogenic women and validate it against videourodynamic studies along with other nomograms.Materials and MethodsFor the first analysis (creation cohort), we included 183 women with LUTS who underwent videourodynamic study between 2022 and 2023. Exclusion criteria were females with neurologic diseases, renal transplantation, and trouble performing the flow‐pressure study. Baseline characteristics of the patients, urodynamic parameters, and classifications on different nomograms and indexes were evaluated. A logistic regression found Qmax and PdetQmax as predictors for DU and BOO. The Barco–Castillo nomogram was created by clustering analysis and adjusted by the results of the logistic regression. A second (test) cohort was evaluated from 2023 to 2024, including 142 patients for the validation of the nomogram. A p < 0.05 was considered significant.ResultsAll urodynamic parameters were compared between both cohorts, with no significant differences. The median age of the creation cohort was 50 years old (interquartile range [IQR] 39–63). All patients had LUTS and a previous standard urodynamic study without a clear diagnosis. The cluster analysis had a p < 0.05 for two groups of BOO (yes/no) and two of DU (yes/no). We created the graph based on the logistic regression results and adjusted it according to the data. The median age of the test cohort was 44 years old (IQR 33.75–59) and had the same indication for the videourodynamic study. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for BOO showed an accuracy of 85.4% for Barco–Castillo nomogram, 68.5% for Blaivas–Groutz, 58.1% for Solomon–Greenwell, 57.1% for BOOI, and 50% for LinPURR. For DU, accuracy was 80.5% for PIP‐1, 80.2% for Barco–Castillo, 76.6% for BCI, and 70.1% for LinPURR.ConclusionsWhen evaluating women's urodynamic studies, it is important to focus on female physiology and discourage the use of parameters previously standardized in men. We encourage using the new Barco–Castillo nomogram to determine BOO and DU in women as the currently easiest and more accurate tool.