青少年特发性脊柱侧凸的矫形与运动治疗相结合的效果:评估协同效益:系统回顾

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS Prosthetics and Orthotics International Pub Date : 2024-09-18 DOI:10.1097/pxr.0000000000000362
Deniz Aktan-Ilgaz, Hande Sahiner, Leyla Eraslan, Ceren Gursen, Hande Guney-Deniz
{"title":"青少年特发性脊柱侧凸的矫形与运动治疗相结合的效果:评估协同效益:系统回顾","authors":"Deniz Aktan-Ilgaz, Hande Sahiner, Leyla Eraslan, Ceren Gursen, Hande Guney-Deniz","doi":"10.1097/pxr.0000000000000362","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study was to evaluate evidence on the effectiveness of combined bracing and exercise on adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). From inception to April 28, 2022, PubMed and Web of Science searched for randomized clinical and nonrandomized prospective studies reporting Cobb angle (CA), angle of trunk rotation (ATR), quality of life (QoL), and pulmonary function (PF) in AIS patients treated with exercise and braces (10 years-skeletal maturity). Two authors analyzed and extracted data for this review. The PEDro scale was used to assess the risk of bias (RoB). Therapy protocols and basic data have been collected. Each CA, ATR, QoL, and PF study’s evidence and strength were also included. A total of 12 studies with 714 patients with AIS were included. Five studies used a control group with exercises and 7 with braces. The results showed that exercise-brace can decrease CA and ATR and increase QoL and PF with AIS; however, the strength of conclusion for all outcomes was moderate. In this review, 4 studies were categorized as low RoB, 3 as moderate RoB, and 5 as high RoB. Level of evidence analysis revealed that 12 studies were classified as level of evidence B. The current studies do not sufficiently support the effects of exercise and brace therapy on CA, ATR, QoL, and PF in patients with AIS.","PeriodicalId":49657,"journal":{"name":"Prosthetics and Orthotics International","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of bracing combined with exercise-based treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: Assessing the synergistic benefits: A systematic review\",\"authors\":\"Deniz Aktan-Ilgaz, Hande Sahiner, Leyla Eraslan, Ceren Gursen, Hande Guney-Deniz\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/pxr.0000000000000362\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of this study was to evaluate evidence on the effectiveness of combined bracing and exercise on adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). From inception to April 28, 2022, PubMed and Web of Science searched for randomized clinical and nonrandomized prospective studies reporting Cobb angle (CA), angle of trunk rotation (ATR), quality of life (QoL), and pulmonary function (PF) in AIS patients treated with exercise and braces (10 years-skeletal maturity). Two authors analyzed and extracted data for this review. The PEDro scale was used to assess the risk of bias (RoB). Therapy protocols and basic data have been collected. Each CA, ATR, QoL, and PF study’s evidence and strength were also included. A total of 12 studies with 714 patients with AIS were included. Five studies used a control group with exercises and 7 with braces. The results showed that exercise-brace can decrease CA and ATR and increase QoL and PF with AIS; however, the strength of conclusion for all outcomes was moderate. In this review, 4 studies were categorized as low RoB, 3 as moderate RoB, and 5 as high RoB. Level of evidence analysis revealed that 12 studies were classified as level of evidence B. The current studies do not sufficiently support the effects of exercise and brace therapy on CA, ATR, QoL, and PF in patients with AIS.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49657,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Prosthetics and Orthotics International\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Prosthetics and Orthotics International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/pxr.0000000000000362\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prosthetics and Orthotics International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/pxr.0000000000000362","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在评估联合支具和运动对青少年特发性脊柱侧凸(AIS)的有效性。从开始到 2022 年 4 月 28 日,PubMed 和 Web of Science 对随机临床研究和非随机前瞻性研究进行了检索,这些研究报告了接受运动和支具治疗的 AIS 患者的 Cobb 角度 (CA)、躯干旋转角度 (ATR)、生活质量 (QoL) 和肺功能 (PF)(10 岁-骨骼成熟)。两位作者为本综述分析并提取了数据。采用PEDro量表评估偏倚风险(RoB)。收集了治疗方案和基本数据。每项CA、ATR、QoL和PF研究的证据和强度也被纳入其中。共纳入了 12 项研究,涉及 714 名 AIS 患者。其中 5 项研究使用了运动对照组,7 项研究使用了支具对照组。结果显示,运动-支具可降低 AIS 患者的 CA 和 ATR,提高 QoL 和 PF;但所有结果的结论强度均为中等。在本综述中,4 项研究被归类为低 RoB,3 项为中 RoB,5 项为高 RoB。证据等级分析显示,12 项研究的证据等级为 B 级。目前的研究不足以支持运动和支撑疗法对 AIS 患者的 CA、ATR、QoL 和 PF 的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effectiveness of bracing combined with exercise-based treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: Assessing the synergistic benefits: A systematic review
The purpose of this study was to evaluate evidence on the effectiveness of combined bracing and exercise on adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). From inception to April 28, 2022, PubMed and Web of Science searched for randomized clinical and nonrandomized prospective studies reporting Cobb angle (CA), angle of trunk rotation (ATR), quality of life (QoL), and pulmonary function (PF) in AIS patients treated with exercise and braces (10 years-skeletal maturity). Two authors analyzed and extracted data for this review. The PEDro scale was used to assess the risk of bias (RoB). Therapy protocols and basic data have been collected. Each CA, ATR, QoL, and PF study’s evidence and strength were also included. A total of 12 studies with 714 patients with AIS were included. Five studies used a control group with exercises and 7 with braces. The results showed that exercise-brace can decrease CA and ATR and increase QoL and PF with AIS; however, the strength of conclusion for all outcomes was moderate. In this review, 4 studies were categorized as low RoB, 3 as moderate RoB, and 5 as high RoB. Level of evidence analysis revealed that 12 studies were classified as level of evidence B. The current studies do not sufficiently support the effects of exercise and brace therapy on CA, ATR, QoL, and PF in patients with AIS.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
13.30%
发文量
208
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Prosthetics and Orthotics International is an international, multidisciplinary journal for all professionals who have an interest in the medical, clinical, rehabilitation, technical, educational and research aspects of prosthetics, orthotics and rehabilitation engineering, as well as their related topics.
期刊最新文献
An environmental scan of limb loss rehabilitation centers across Canada. Design of a custom metamaterial insert for improved pressure distribution within transtibial prosthetic sockets. Effects of a low-cost prosthetic knee on amputee gait over uneven and even terrains. Time to successful outcome vs. treatment duration in cranial remolding orthosis treatment. Is biomechanical loading reduced in individuals with unilateral transtibial amputation during fast-paced walking when using different ankle/foot prostheses? A pragmatic randomized controlled trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1