评估 3 岁前后人工耳蜗植入年龄对实用能力的影响。

IF 1.4 4区 心理学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Applied Neuropsychology: Child Pub Date : 2024-09-13 DOI:10.1080/21622965.2024.2403100
Pegah Nikrah,Rasool Ghareh Chahie,Atieh Ghazvini,Alemeh Hajizadeh
{"title":"评估 3 岁前后人工耳蜗植入年龄对实用能力的影响。","authors":"Pegah Nikrah,Rasool Ghareh Chahie,Atieh Ghazvini,Alemeh Hajizadeh","doi":"10.1080/21622965.2024.2403100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION\r\nThe cochlear implant (CI) is crucial in developing hearing, speech, language, and communication skills in children with profound hearing loss (HL). The study aimed to assess how the age at which children receive a CI affects the development of pragmatic abilities between the ages of 5 and 8 for those who received a CI before or after the age of 3.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nForty children with CI were evaluated. The children between the ages of 5 and 8 were divided into two groups who received CIs before or after age 3. The Persian version of the Children's Communication Checklist (CCC) was used to assess pragmatic abilities with a parent rating scale.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nChildren implanted under 3 got higher scores in social relationships, using context, conversational rapport, syntax, and speech. Also, their performance in inappropriate and stereotyped conversations was better than those over 3 years. They have a significant difference in the pragmatic composite than those who received CI over 3 except for coherence and interest (p < 0.05).\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nAccording to the results, children with CI under 3 performed better in pragmatic composites, which means they have better pragmatic abilities. These findings suggest that early CI is important. Of course, other individual and environmental factors must also be considered.","PeriodicalId":8047,"journal":{"name":"Applied Neuropsychology: Child","volume":"16 1","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the effect of cochlear implantation age on pragmatic abilities before and after age of 3.\",\"authors\":\"Pegah Nikrah,Rasool Ghareh Chahie,Atieh Ghazvini,Alemeh Hajizadeh\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21622965.2024.2403100\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"INTRODUCTION\\r\\nThe cochlear implant (CI) is crucial in developing hearing, speech, language, and communication skills in children with profound hearing loss (HL). The study aimed to assess how the age at which children receive a CI affects the development of pragmatic abilities between the ages of 5 and 8 for those who received a CI before or after the age of 3.\\r\\n\\r\\nMETHODS\\r\\nForty children with CI were evaluated. The children between the ages of 5 and 8 were divided into two groups who received CIs before or after age 3. The Persian version of the Children's Communication Checklist (CCC) was used to assess pragmatic abilities with a parent rating scale.\\r\\n\\r\\nRESULTS\\r\\nChildren implanted under 3 got higher scores in social relationships, using context, conversational rapport, syntax, and speech. Also, their performance in inappropriate and stereotyped conversations was better than those over 3 years. They have a significant difference in the pragmatic composite than those who received CI over 3 except for coherence and interest (p < 0.05).\\r\\n\\r\\nCONCLUSION\\r\\nAccording to the results, children with CI under 3 performed better in pragmatic composites, which means they have better pragmatic abilities. These findings suggest that early CI is important. Of course, other individual and environmental factors must also be considered.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8047,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Neuropsychology: Child\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"1-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Neuropsychology: Child\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21622965.2024.2403100\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Neuropsychology: Child","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21622965.2024.2403100","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言 人工耳蜗(CI)对重度听力损失(HL)儿童的听力、言语、语言和沟通能力的发展至关重要。本研究旨在评估儿童接受 CI 的年龄如何影响那些在 3 岁之前或之后接受 CI 的儿童在 5 至 8 岁期间语用能力的发展。这些 5 至 8 岁的儿童被分为两组,分别在 3 岁之前或之后接受 CI。结果 3 岁以下植入 CI 的儿童在社交关系、语境使用、对话默契、句法和言语方面得分更高。此外,他们在不恰当会话和刻板会话中的表现也优于 3 岁以上的儿童。除了连贯性和兴趣(P < 0.05)外,他们在语用综合能力方面与 3 岁以上接受 CI 的儿童相比有明显差异。这些结果表明,早期 CI 非常重要。当然,还必须考虑其他个人和环境因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluating the effect of cochlear implantation age on pragmatic abilities before and after age of 3.
INTRODUCTION The cochlear implant (CI) is crucial in developing hearing, speech, language, and communication skills in children with profound hearing loss (HL). The study aimed to assess how the age at which children receive a CI affects the development of pragmatic abilities between the ages of 5 and 8 for those who received a CI before or after the age of 3. METHODS Forty children with CI were evaluated. The children between the ages of 5 and 8 were divided into two groups who received CIs before or after age 3. The Persian version of the Children's Communication Checklist (CCC) was used to assess pragmatic abilities with a parent rating scale. RESULTS Children implanted under 3 got higher scores in social relationships, using context, conversational rapport, syntax, and speech. Also, their performance in inappropriate and stereotyped conversations was better than those over 3 years. They have a significant difference in the pragmatic composite than those who received CI over 3 except for coherence and interest (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION According to the results, children with CI under 3 performed better in pragmatic composites, which means they have better pragmatic abilities. These findings suggest that early CI is important. Of course, other individual and environmental factors must also be considered.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Neuropsychology: Child
Applied Neuropsychology: Child CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-PSYCHOLOGY
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
47
期刊介绍: Applied Neuropsychology: Child publishes clinical neuropsychological articles concerning assessment, brain functioning and neuroimaging, neuropsychological treatment, and rehabilitation in children. Full-length articles and brief communications are included. Case studies of child patients carefully assessing the nature, course, or treatment of clinical neuropsychological dysfunctions in the context of scientific literature, are suitable. Review manuscripts addressing critical issues are encouraged. Preference is given to papers of clinical relevance to others in the field. All submitted manuscripts are subject to initial appraisal by the Editor-in-Chief, and, if found suitable for further considerations are peer reviewed by independent, anonymous expert referees. All peer review is single-blind and submission is online via ScholarOne Manuscripts.
期刊最新文献
Differential diagnosis: Understanding nonverbal learning disorder and autism spectrum disorder. Chanting and meditation: an 8-week intervention to promote executive functions in school-age children. About the relationship between executive function, theory of mind, and language abilities in children with autism: a systematic review. Cognitive profiles and developmental variations in ADHD: A comparative analysis of childhood and adolescent diagnoses. A novel approach to ADHD classification based on severity and emotional impairment: Findings from artificial intelligence analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1