心力衰竭护理的公平性:根据指南分析不同性别、种族、人种和保险在医院之间和医院内部的护理差异》(Get With the Guidelines Analysis of Between and Within-Hospital Differences in Care by Sex, Race, Ethnicity, and Insurance)。

IF 7.8 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Circulation: Heart Failure Pub Date : 2024-09-18 DOI:10.1161/circheartfailure.123.011177
Alexander T Sandhu,Maria V Grau-Sepulveda,Celeste Witting,Rebecca L Tisdale,Jimmy Zheng,Fatima Rodriguez,Justin A Edward,Andrew P Ambrosy,Stephen J Greene,Brooke Alhanti,Gregg C Fonarow,Karen E Joynt Maddox,Paul A Heidenreich
{"title":"心力衰竭护理的公平性:根据指南分析不同性别、种族、人种和保险在医院之间和医院内部的护理差异》(Get With the Guidelines Analysis of Between and Within-Hospital Differences in Care by Sex, Race, Ethnicity, and Insurance)。","authors":"Alexander T Sandhu,Maria V Grau-Sepulveda,Celeste Witting,Rebecca L Tisdale,Jimmy Zheng,Fatima Rodriguez,Justin A Edward,Andrew P Ambrosy,Stephen J Greene,Brooke Alhanti,Gregg C Fonarow,Karen E Joynt Maddox,Paul A Heidenreich","doi":"10.1161/circheartfailure.123.011177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nDisparities in guideline-based quality measures likely contribute to differences in heart failure (HF) outcomes. We evaluated between- and within-hospital differences in the quality of care across sex, race, ethnicity, and insurance for patients hospitalized for HF.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nThis retrospective analysis included patients hospitalized for HF across 596 hospitals in the Get With the Guidelines-HF registry between 2016 and 2021. We evaluated performance across 7 measures stratified by patient sex, race, ethnicity, and insurance. We evaluated differences in performance with and without adjustment for the treating hospital. We also measured variation in hospital-specific disparities.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nAmong 685 227 patients, the median patient age was 72 (interquartile range, 61-82) and 47.2% were women. Measure performance was significantly lower (worse) for women compared with men for all 7 measures before adjustment. For 4 of 7 measures, there were no significant sex-related differences after patient-level adjustment. For 20 of 25 other comparisons, racial and ethnic minorities and Medicaid/uninsured patients had similar or higher (better) adjusted measure performance compared with White and Medicare/privately insured patients, respectively. Angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor measure performance was significantly lower for Asian, Hispanic, and Medicaid/uninsured patients, and cardiac resynchronization therapy implant/prescription was lower among women and Black patients after hospital adjustment, indicating within-hospital differences. There was hospital-level variation in these differences. For cardiac resynchronization therapy implantation/prescription, 278 hospitals (46.6%) had ≥2% lower implant/prescription for Black versus White patients compared with 109 hospitals (18.3%) with the same or higher cardiac resynchronization therapy implantation/prescription for Black patients.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nHF quality measure performance was equitable for most measures. There were within-hospital differences in angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor and cardiac resynchronization therapy implant/prescription for historically marginalized groups. The magnitude of hospital-specific disparities varied across hospitals.","PeriodicalId":10196,"journal":{"name":"Circulation: Heart Failure","volume":"48 1","pages":"e011177"},"PeriodicalIF":7.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Equity in Heart Failure Care: A Get With the Guidelines Analysis of Between- and Within-Hospital Differences in Care by Sex, Race, Ethnicity, and Insurance.\",\"authors\":\"Alexander T Sandhu,Maria V Grau-Sepulveda,Celeste Witting,Rebecca L Tisdale,Jimmy Zheng,Fatima Rodriguez,Justin A Edward,Andrew P Ambrosy,Stephen J Greene,Brooke Alhanti,Gregg C Fonarow,Karen E Joynt Maddox,Paul A Heidenreich\",\"doi\":\"10.1161/circheartfailure.123.011177\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND\\r\\nDisparities in guideline-based quality measures likely contribute to differences in heart failure (HF) outcomes. We evaluated between- and within-hospital differences in the quality of care across sex, race, ethnicity, and insurance for patients hospitalized for HF.\\r\\n\\r\\nMETHODS\\r\\nThis retrospective analysis included patients hospitalized for HF across 596 hospitals in the Get With the Guidelines-HF registry between 2016 and 2021. We evaluated performance across 7 measures stratified by patient sex, race, ethnicity, and insurance. We evaluated differences in performance with and without adjustment for the treating hospital. We also measured variation in hospital-specific disparities.\\r\\n\\r\\nRESULTS\\r\\nAmong 685 227 patients, the median patient age was 72 (interquartile range, 61-82) and 47.2% were women. Measure performance was significantly lower (worse) for women compared with men for all 7 measures before adjustment. For 4 of 7 measures, there were no significant sex-related differences after patient-level adjustment. For 20 of 25 other comparisons, racial and ethnic minorities and Medicaid/uninsured patients had similar or higher (better) adjusted measure performance compared with White and Medicare/privately insured patients, respectively. Angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor measure performance was significantly lower for Asian, Hispanic, and Medicaid/uninsured patients, and cardiac resynchronization therapy implant/prescription was lower among women and Black patients after hospital adjustment, indicating within-hospital differences. There was hospital-level variation in these differences. For cardiac resynchronization therapy implantation/prescription, 278 hospitals (46.6%) had ≥2% lower implant/prescription for Black versus White patients compared with 109 hospitals (18.3%) with the same or higher cardiac resynchronization therapy implantation/prescription for Black patients.\\r\\n\\r\\nCONCLUSIONS\\r\\nHF quality measure performance was equitable for most measures. There were within-hospital differences in angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor and cardiac resynchronization therapy implant/prescription for historically marginalized groups. The magnitude of hospital-specific disparities varied across hospitals.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10196,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Circulation: Heart Failure\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"e011177\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Circulation: Heart Failure\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1161/circheartfailure.123.011177\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circulation: Heart Failure","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/circheartfailure.123.011177","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景基于指南的质量衡量标准的差异很可能导致心力衰竭(HF)结果的不同。我们评估了不同性别、种族、民族和保险的心力衰竭住院患者在医院间和医院内的医疗质量差异。方法这项回顾性分析纳入了 2016 年至 2021 年期间在《Get With the Guidelines-HF 》登记处的 596 家医院住院的心力衰竭患者。我们评估了按患者性别、种族、民族和保险分层的 7 项措施的绩效。我们评估了对治疗医院进行调整和未进行调整的绩效差异。结果在 685 227 名患者中,患者年龄中位数为 72 岁(四分位间范围为 61-82),47.2% 为女性。在调整前的所有 7 项测量中,女性的测量绩效明显低于男性(更差)。对于 7 项测量中的 4 项,在对患者水平进行调整后,与性别相关的差异并不明显。在其他 25 项比较中的 20 项比较中,少数种族和少数民族以及医疗补助/无保险患者与白人和医疗保险/私人保险患者相比,其调整后的测量结果分别相似或更高(更好)。经医院调整后,亚裔、西班牙裔和医疗补助/未参保患者的血管紧张素受体肾素抑制剂测量绩效明显较低,女性和黑人患者的心脏再同步化治疗植入/处方绩效较低,这表明医院内部存在差异。这些差异存在医院层面的差异。在心脏再同步化治疗植入/处方方面,278 家医院(46.6%)的黑人患者植入/处方比白人患者低≥2%,而 109 家医院(18.3%)的黑人患者心脏再同步化治疗植入/处方与白人患者相同或更高。历史上被边缘化的群体在血管紧张素受体肾素抑制剂和心脏再同步疗法植入/处方方面存在院内差异。各家医院的具体差异程度不尽相同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Equity in Heart Failure Care: A Get With the Guidelines Analysis of Between- and Within-Hospital Differences in Care by Sex, Race, Ethnicity, and Insurance.
BACKGROUND Disparities in guideline-based quality measures likely contribute to differences in heart failure (HF) outcomes. We evaluated between- and within-hospital differences in the quality of care across sex, race, ethnicity, and insurance for patients hospitalized for HF. METHODS This retrospective analysis included patients hospitalized for HF across 596 hospitals in the Get With the Guidelines-HF registry between 2016 and 2021. We evaluated performance across 7 measures stratified by patient sex, race, ethnicity, and insurance. We evaluated differences in performance with and without adjustment for the treating hospital. We also measured variation in hospital-specific disparities. RESULTS Among 685 227 patients, the median patient age was 72 (interquartile range, 61-82) and 47.2% were women. Measure performance was significantly lower (worse) for women compared with men for all 7 measures before adjustment. For 4 of 7 measures, there were no significant sex-related differences after patient-level adjustment. For 20 of 25 other comparisons, racial and ethnic minorities and Medicaid/uninsured patients had similar or higher (better) adjusted measure performance compared with White and Medicare/privately insured patients, respectively. Angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor measure performance was significantly lower for Asian, Hispanic, and Medicaid/uninsured patients, and cardiac resynchronization therapy implant/prescription was lower among women and Black patients after hospital adjustment, indicating within-hospital differences. There was hospital-level variation in these differences. For cardiac resynchronization therapy implantation/prescription, 278 hospitals (46.6%) had ≥2% lower implant/prescription for Black versus White patients compared with 109 hospitals (18.3%) with the same or higher cardiac resynchronization therapy implantation/prescription for Black patients. CONCLUSIONS HF quality measure performance was equitable for most measures. There were within-hospital differences in angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor and cardiac resynchronization therapy implant/prescription for historically marginalized groups. The magnitude of hospital-specific disparities varied across hospitals.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Circulation: Heart Failure
Circulation: Heart Failure 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
12.90
自引率
3.10%
发文量
271
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Circulation: Heart Failure focuses on content related to heart failure, mechanical circulatory support, and heart transplant science and medicine. It considers studies conducted in humans or analyses of human data, as well as preclinical studies with direct clinical correlation or relevance. While primarily a clinical journal, it may publish novel basic and preclinical studies that significantly advance the field of heart failure.
期刊最新文献
Natural Language Processing to Adjudicate Heart Failure Hospitalizations in Global Clinical Trials. A Medical Expert System for Intelligent Telemonitoring of Chronic Heart Failure Patients: Preliminary Validation and Perspectives. Comprehensive Proteomics Profiling Identifies Circulating Biomarkers to Distinguish Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy from Other Cardiomyopathies with Left Ventricular Hypertrophy. Mavacamten: Real-World Experience from 22 Months of the Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) Program. Social Determinants of Health and Disparities in Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy Optimization for Heart Failure.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1