影响卫生专业人员决定婴儿配方奶粉适应症的因素:乌拉圭的定性研究

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING Journal of Human Lactation Pub Date : 2024-09-17 DOI:10.1177/08903344241271346
Alejandra Girona, Gerónimo Brunet, Gastón Ares, Raquel Rodríguez, Carolina de León, Mónica Lozano, Leticia Vidal
{"title":"影响卫生专业人员决定婴儿配方奶粉适应症的因素:乌拉圭的定性研究","authors":"Alejandra Girona, Gerónimo Brunet, Gastón Ares, Raquel Rodríguez, Carolina de León, Mónica Lozano, Leticia Vidal","doi":"10.1177/08903344241271346","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background:Health systems are fundamental to the promotion and protection of breastfeeding. Health professionals have a pivotal influence on families’ infant feeding decisions and may act as facilitators or barriers to adequate breastfeeding practices.Research Aim:To explore factors influencing health professionals’ decisions regarding the indication of infant formula in Montevideo, the capital of Uruguay, an emerging Latin American country.Method:This was a qualitative study based on semi-structured interviews with 30 health professionals (neonatologists, pediatricians, family doctors, and nurses) working in primary and secondary care in both private and public health institutions. The interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using content analysis based on deductive-inductive coding.Results:The narratives of the participants identified maternity wards as the healthcare sites where the indication of infant formula occurs most frequently. Motives underlying the indication of infant formula by health professionals were diverse. The type of birth and the conditions of the child and the mother were the most relevant in secondary care, whereas maternal work was the main determining factor in primary care. A wide range of factors encouraging and discouraging the indication of infant formula were identified by health professionals in primary and secondary healthcare locations, which were related to all the levels of influence of the socioecological model.Conclusions:Strategies to reduce the use of infant formula in Uruguay should include improving the support and guidance provided to families in the maternity ward, strengthening the implementation and monitoring of the Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative, and improving the current maternity leave regulations.","PeriodicalId":15948,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Human Lactation","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Factors Influencing Health Professionals’ Decisions Regarding the Indication of Infant Formula: A Qualitative Exploration in Uruguay\",\"authors\":\"Alejandra Girona, Gerónimo Brunet, Gastón Ares, Raquel Rodríguez, Carolina de León, Mónica Lozano, Leticia Vidal\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/08903344241271346\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background:Health systems are fundamental to the promotion and protection of breastfeeding. Health professionals have a pivotal influence on families’ infant feeding decisions and may act as facilitators or barriers to adequate breastfeeding practices.Research Aim:To explore factors influencing health professionals’ decisions regarding the indication of infant formula in Montevideo, the capital of Uruguay, an emerging Latin American country.Method:This was a qualitative study based on semi-structured interviews with 30 health professionals (neonatologists, pediatricians, family doctors, and nurses) working in primary and secondary care in both private and public health institutions. The interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using content analysis based on deductive-inductive coding.Results:The narratives of the participants identified maternity wards as the healthcare sites where the indication of infant formula occurs most frequently. Motives underlying the indication of infant formula by health professionals were diverse. The type of birth and the conditions of the child and the mother were the most relevant in secondary care, whereas maternal work was the main determining factor in primary care. A wide range of factors encouraging and discouraging the indication of infant formula were identified by health professionals in primary and secondary healthcare locations, which were related to all the levels of influence of the socioecological model.Conclusions:Strategies to reduce the use of infant formula in Uruguay should include improving the support and guidance provided to families in the maternity ward, strengthening the implementation and monitoring of the Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative, and improving the current maternity leave regulations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15948,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Human Lactation\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Human Lactation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/08903344241271346\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Human Lactation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08903344241271346","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究背景:卫生系统是促进和保护母乳喂养的基础。研究目的:探讨在乌拉圭首都蒙得维的亚(一个新兴的拉丁美洲国家),影响卫生专业人员决定婴儿配方奶粉适应症的因素。研究方法:这是一项定性研究,通过半结构化访谈的方式,访问了 30 位在私立和公立医疗机构从事初级和二级医疗工作的卫生专业人员(新生儿科医生、儿科医生、家庭医生和护士)。对访谈进行了录音、转录,并采用基于演绎-归纳编码的内容分析法进行了分析。结果:参与者的叙述表明,产科病房是最常出现婴儿配方奶粉适应症的医疗场所。医护人员指示婴儿配方奶粉的动机多种多样。在二级医疗机构中,分娩类型以及婴儿和母亲的状况是最相关的因素,而在一级医疗机构中,产妇的工作则是主要的决定性因素。结论:在乌拉圭,减少婴儿配方奶粉使用量的策略应包括改善产科病房为家庭提供的支持和指导,加强爱婴医院倡议的实施和监督,以及改善现行的产假规定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Factors Influencing Health Professionals’ Decisions Regarding the Indication of Infant Formula: A Qualitative Exploration in Uruguay
Background:Health systems are fundamental to the promotion and protection of breastfeeding. Health professionals have a pivotal influence on families’ infant feeding decisions and may act as facilitators or barriers to adequate breastfeeding practices.Research Aim:To explore factors influencing health professionals’ decisions regarding the indication of infant formula in Montevideo, the capital of Uruguay, an emerging Latin American country.Method:This was a qualitative study based on semi-structured interviews with 30 health professionals (neonatologists, pediatricians, family doctors, and nurses) working in primary and secondary care in both private and public health institutions. The interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using content analysis based on deductive-inductive coding.Results:The narratives of the participants identified maternity wards as the healthcare sites where the indication of infant formula occurs most frequently. Motives underlying the indication of infant formula by health professionals were diverse. The type of birth and the conditions of the child and the mother were the most relevant in secondary care, whereas maternal work was the main determining factor in primary care. A wide range of factors encouraging and discouraging the indication of infant formula were identified by health professionals in primary and secondary healthcare locations, which were related to all the levels of influence of the socioecological model.Conclusions:Strategies to reduce the use of infant formula in Uruguay should include improving the support and guidance provided to families in the maternity ward, strengthening the implementation and monitoring of the Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative, and improving the current maternity leave regulations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Human Lactation
Journal of Human Lactation 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
11.50%
发文量
100
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Committed to the promotion of diversity and equity in all our policies and practices, our aims are: To provide our readers and the international communities of clinicians, educators and scholars working in the field of lactation with current and quality-based evidence, from a broad array of disciplines, including the medical sciences, basic sciences, social sciences and the humanities. To provide student and novice researchers, as well as, researchers whose native language is not English, with expert editorial guidance while preparing their work for publication in JHL. In each issue, the Journal of Human Lactation publishes original research, original theoretical and conceptual articles, discussions of policy and practice issues, and the following special features: Advocacy: A column that discusses a ‘hot’ topic in lactation advocacy About Research: A column focused on an in-depth discussion of a different research topic each issue Lactation Newsmakers: An interview with a widely-recognized outstanding expert in the field from around the globe Research Commentary: A brief discussion of the issues raised in a specific research article published in the current issue Book review(s): Reviews written by content experts about relevant new publications International News Briefs: From major international lactation organizations.
期刊最新文献
Immunological Factors and Macronutrient Content in Human Milk From Women With Subclinical Mastitis. Considerations When Measuring Exclusive Breastfeeding. Bridging the Gap Between Lactation Care and Research in Human Lactation. Utilizing Lactation Acuity to Improve Lactation Services in a U.S. Hospital. Breastfeeding Intentions, Attitudes, and Knowledge Among Medical Students in Croatia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1