术前食管下括约肌压力升高预示着经口腔内窥镜肌切开术(POEM)后临床效果的改善

Hamza Nasir Chatha, Joshua Lyons, Christina S. Boutros, Saher-Zahra Khan, Patrick Wieland, Iris Levine, Jamie Benson, Christine Alvarado, Guy Katz, Jeffrey M. Marks
{"title":"术前食管下括约肌压力升高预示着经口腔内窥镜肌切开术(POEM)后临床效果的改善","authors":"Hamza Nasir Chatha, Joshua Lyons, Christina S. Boutros, Saher-Zahra Khan, Patrick Wieland, Iris Levine, Jamie Benson, Christine Alvarado, Guy Katz, Jeffrey M. Marks","doi":"10.1007/s00464-024-11229-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Background</h3><p>Although per oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) has shown to be beneficial for the treatment of achalasia, it can be difficult to predict who will have a robust and long-lasting response. Historically, it has been shown that higher lower esophageal sphincter pressures have been associated with poorer responses to alternative endoscopic therapies such as Botox therapy and pneumatic dilation. This study was designed to evaluate if modern preoperative manometric data could similarly predict response to therapy after POEM.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>This was a retrospective study of 237 patients who underwent POEM at a single institution over a period of 13 years (2011–2023) and who had a high-resolution manometry performed preoperatively and an Eckardt symptom score performed both preoperative and postoperatively. The achalasia type and integrated relaxation pressures (IRP) were tested for potential correlation with the need for any further achalasia interventions postoperatively as well as the degree of Eckardt score reduction using a linear regression model.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>The Achalasia type on preoperative manometry was not predictive for further interventions or degree of Eckardt score reduction (<i>p</i> = 0.76 and 0.43, respectively). A higher IRP was not predictive of the need for further interventions, however, it was predictive of a greater reduction in postoperative Eckardt scores (<i>p</i> = 0.03) as shown by the non-zero regression slope.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>In this study, achalasia type was not a predictive factor in the need for further interventions or the degree of symptom relief. Although IRP was not predictive of the need for further interventions, a higher IRP did predict better symptomatic relief postoperatively. This result is opposite that of other endoscopic treatment modalities (Botox and pneumatic dilation). Therefore, patients with higher IRP on preoperative high-resolution manometry would likely benefit from POEM which provides significant symptomatic relief postoperatively.</p>","PeriodicalId":501625,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Endoscopy","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Elevated preoperative lower esophageal sphincter pressure predicts improved clinical outcomes after per oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM)\",\"authors\":\"Hamza Nasir Chatha, Joshua Lyons, Christina S. Boutros, Saher-Zahra Khan, Patrick Wieland, Iris Levine, Jamie Benson, Christine Alvarado, Guy Katz, Jeffrey M. Marks\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00464-024-11229-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Background</h3><p>Although per oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) has shown to be beneficial for the treatment of achalasia, it can be difficult to predict who will have a robust and long-lasting response. Historically, it has been shown that higher lower esophageal sphincter pressures have been associated with poorer responses to alternative endoscopic therapies such as Botox therapy and pneumatic dilation. This study was designed to evaluate if modern preoperative manometric data could similarly predict response to therapy after POEM.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Methods</h3><p>This was a retrospective study of 237 patients who underwent POEM at a single institution over a period of 13 years (2011–2023) and who had a high-resolution manometry performed preoperatively and an Eckardt symptom score performed both preoperative and postoperatively. The achalasia type and integrated relaxation pressures (IRP) were tested for potential correlation with the need for any further achalasia interventions postoperatively as well as the degree of Eckardt score reduction using a linear regression model.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Results</h3><p>The Achalasia type on preoperative manometry was not predictive for further interventions or degree of Eckardt score reduction (<i>p</i> = 0.76 and 0.43, respectively). A higher IRP was not predictive of the need for further interventions, however, it was predictive of a greater reduction in postoperative Eckardt scores (<i>p</i> = 0.03) as shown by the non-zero regression slope.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Conclusion</h3><p>In this study, achalasia type was not a predictive factor in the need for further interventions or the degree of symptom relief. Although IRP was not predictive of the need for further interventions, a higher IRP did predict better symptomatic relief postoperatively. This result is opposite that of other endoscopic treatment modalities (Botox and pneumatic dilation). Therefore, patients with higher IRP on preoperative high-resolution manometry would likely benefit from POEM which provides significant symptomatic relief postoperatively.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":501625,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgical Endoscopy\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgical Endoscopy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-024-11229-4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-024-11229-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景虽然经口腔内镜下肌切开术(POEM)已被证明对治疗贲门失弛缓症有益,但很难预测哪些患者会获得稳健而持久的疗效。从历史上看,较高的食管下括约肌压力与肉毒杆菌毒素疗法和气压扩张术等替代内窥镜疗法的不良反应有关。本研究旨在评估现代术前测压数据是否同样可以预测 POEM 术后的治疗反应。方法这是一项回顾性研究,研究对象是在 13 年内(2011-2023 年)在一家医疗机构接受 POEM 手术的 237 名患者,这些患者在术前进行了高分辨率测压,并在术前和术后进行了 Eckardt 症状评分。采用线性回归模型检测了贲门失弛缓症类型和综合松弛压(IRP)与术后是否需要进一步进行贲门失弛缓症干预以及 Eckardt 评分降低程度的潜在相关性。然而,从非零回归斜率可以看出,IRP 越高,术后 Eckardt 评分的降低幅度越大(p = 0.03)。虽然 IRP 不能预测是否需要进一步干预,但 IRP 越高,术后症状缓解越好。这一结果与其他内窥镜治疗方法(肉毒杆菌毒素和气压扩张术)相反。因此,术前进行高分辨率测压时IRP较高的患者很可能会从POEM中获益,因为POEM在术后能明显缓解症状。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Elevated preoperative lower esophageal sphincter pressure predicts improved clinical outcomes after per oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM)

Background

Although per oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) has shown to be beneficial for the treatment of achalasia, it can be difficult to predict who will have a robust and long-lasting response. Historically, it has been shown that higher lower esophageal sphincter pressures have been associated with poorer responses to alternative endoscopic therapies such as Botox therapy and pneumatic dilation. This study was designed to evaluate if modern preoperative manometric data could similarly predict response to therapy after POEM.

Methods

This was a retrospective study of 237 patients who underwent POEM at a single institution over a period of 13 years (2011–2023) and who had a high-resolution manometry performed preoperatively and an Eckardt symptom score performed both preoperative and postoperatively. The achalasia type and integrated relaxation pressures (IRP) were tested for potential correlation with the need for any further achalasia interventions postoperatively as well as the degree of Eckardt score reduction using a linear regression model.

Results

The Achalasia type on preoperative manometry was not predictive for further interventions or degree of Eckardt score reduction (p = 0.76 and 0.43, respectively). A higher IRP was not predictive of the need for further interventions, however, it was predictive of a greater reduction in postoperative Eckardt scores (p = 0.03) as shown by the non-zero regression slope.

Conclusion

In this study, achalasia type was not a predictive factor in the need for further interventions or the degree of symptom relief. Although IRP was not predictive of the need for further interventions, a higher IRP did predict better symptomatic relief postoperatively. This result is opposite that of other endoscopic treatment modalities (Botox and pneumatic dilation). Therefore, patients with higher IRP on preoperative high-resolution manometry would likely benefit from POEM which provides significant symptomatic relief postoperatively.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Short-term gut microbiota’s shift after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y vs one anastomosis gastric bypass: results of a multicenter randomized control trial Classifying frailty in the ventral hernia population Retrospective study on endoscopic treatment of recurrent esophageal cancer patients after radiotherapy State of the art medical devices for fluorescence-guided surgery (FGS): technical review and future developments Conquering the common bile duct: outcomes in minimally invasive transcystic common bile duct exploration versus ERCP
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1