符合临床试验观察标准的原位导管癌患者比例。

IF 2 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Journal of Surgical Oncology Pub Date : 2024-09-19 DOI:10.1002/jso.27858
Callie D McAdams,Nicholas Clevenger,Kyra Nicholson,Catherine Pesce,Katherine Kopkash,Elizabeth Poli,Thomas W Smith,Katherine Yao
{"title":"符合临床试验观察标准的原位导管癌患者比例。","authors":"Callie D McAdams,Nicholas Clevenger,Kyra Nicholson,Catherine Pesce,Katherine Kopkash,Elizabeth Poli,Thomas W Smith,Katherine Yao","doi":"10.1002/jso.27858","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nThe COMET, LORD, and LORIS clinical trials are investigating the role of active surveillance in low-risk ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). The objective of this study was to identify the proportion of patients eligible for these trials amongst a cohort of patients treated at our institution.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nRetrospective chart review was performed of patients diagnosed with DCIS who were treated from 2013 to 2022. Clinical, tumor, and imaging inclusion and exclusion criteria of the aforementioned observation trials were applied to determine the proportion of patients eligible for each trial. Upgrade rate to invasive cancer were examined across all three groups.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nOf 1223 patients diagnosed with DCIS, applying the criteria of each trial, 245 (20%), 238 (19.4%), and 264 (21.6%) patients were eligible for the COMET, LORD, and LORIS trials, respectively. High-grade DCIS and mass on imaging had the largest impact on exclusion. Nineteen (7.8%) of women who qualified for COMET were upgraded to invasive disease at excision, compared to 18 (7.6%) for LORD, and 19 (7.2%) for LORIS.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nOne in five patients diagnosed with DCIS at our institution would qualify for observation with current trial eligibility. Observation of DCIS may have limited impact on all DCIS patients.","PeriodicalId":17111,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Proportion of Patients With Ductal Carcinoma In Situ That Qualify for Observation Criteria Set Forth by Clinical Trials.\",\"authors\":\"Callie D McAdams,Nicholas Clevenger,Kyra Nicholson,Catherine Pesce,Katherine Kopkash,Elizabeth Poli,Thomas W Smith,Katherine Yao\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jso.27858\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND\\r\\nThe COMET, LORD, and LORIS clinical trials are investigating the role of active surveillance in low-risk ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). The objective of this study was to identify the proportion of patients eligible for these trials amongst a cohort of patients treated at our institution.\\r\\n\\r\\nMETHODS\\r\\nRetrospective chart review was performed of patients diagnosed with DCIS who were treated from 2013 to 2022. Clinical, tumor, and imaging inclusion and exclusion criteria of the aforementioned observation trials were applied to determine the proportion of patients eligible for each trial. Upgrade rate to invasive cancer were examined across all three groups.\\r\\n\\r\\nRESULTS\\r\\nOf 1223 patients diagnosed with DCIS, applying the criteria of each trial, 245 (20%), 238 (19.4%), and 264 (21.6%) patients were eligible for the COMET, LORD, and LORIS trials, respectively. High-grade DCIS and mass on imaging had the largest impact on exclusion. Nineteen (7.8%) of women who qualified for COMET were upgraded to invasive disease at excision, compared to 18 (7.6%) for LORD, and 19 (7.2%) for LORIS.\\r\\n\\r\\nCONCLUSIONS\\r\\nOne in five patients diagnosed with DCIS at our institution would qualify for observation with current trial eligibility. Observation of DCIS may have limited impact on all DCIS patients.\",\"PeriodicalId\":17111,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Surgical Oncology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Surgical Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.27858\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.27858","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景 COMET、LORD 和 LORIS 临床试验正在研究主动监测在低风险导管原位癌 (DCIS) 中的作用。本研究旨在确定在本院接受治疗的患者队列中符合这些试验条件的患者比例。方法对 2013 年至 2022 年接受治疗的 DCIS 患者进行回顾性病历审查。应用上述观察试验的临床、肿瘤和影像学纳入和排除标准,确定符合每项试验条件的患者比例。结果 在1223名确诊为DCIS的患者中,根据每项试验的标准,分别有245名(20%)、238名(19.4%)和264名(21.6%)患者符合COMET、LORD和LORIS试验的条件。高分级 DCIS 和影像学肿块对排除试验的影响最大。在符合COMET试验条件的女性患者中,有19人(7.8%)在切除时升级为浸润性疾病,而符合LORD试验条件的有18人(7.6%),符合LORIS试验条件的有19人(7.2%)。观察DCIS对所有DCIS患者的影响可能有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Proportion of Patients With Ductal Carcinoma In Situ That Qualify for Observation Criteria Set Forth by Clinical Trials.
BACKGROUND The COMET, LORD, and LORIS clinical trials are investigating the role of active surveillance in low-risk ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). The objective of this study was to identify the proportion of patients eligible for these trials amongst a cohort of patients treated at our institution. METHODS Retrospective chart review was performed of patients diagnosed with DCIS who were treated from 2013 to 2022. Clinical, tumor, and imaging inclusion and exclusion criteria of the aforementioned observation trials were applied to determine the proportion of patients eligible for each trial. Upgrade rate to invasive cancer were examined across all three groups. RESULTS Of 1223 patients diagnosed with DCIS, applying the criteria of each trial, 245 (20%), 238 (19.4%), and 264 (21.6%) patients were eligible for the COMET, LORD, and LORIS trials, respectively. High-grade DCIS and mass on imaging had the largest impact on exclusion. Nineteen (7.8%) of women who qualified for COMET were upgraded to invasive disease at excision, compared to 18 (7.6%) for LORD, and 19 (7.2%) for LORIS. CONCLUSIONS One in five patients diagnosed with DCIS at our institution would qualify for observation with current trial eligibility. Observation of DCIS may have limited impact on all DCIS patients.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
4.00%
发文量
367
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Surgical Oncology offers peer-reviewed, original papers in the field of surgical oncology and broadly related surgical sciences, including reports on experimental and laboratory studies. As an international journal, the editors encourage participation from leading surgeons around the world. The JSO is the representative journal for the World Federation of Surgical Oncology Societies. Publishing 16 issues in 2 volumes each year, the journal accepts Research Articles, in-depth Reviews of timely interest, Letters to the Editor, and invited Editorials. Guest Editors from the JSO Editorial Board oversee multiple special Seminars issues each year. These Seminars include multifaceted Reviews on a particular topic or current issue in surgical oncology, which are invited from experts in the field.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information The Impact of Intraoperative Anesthesiology Provider Handovers on Postoperative Complications After Hepatopancreatobiliary (HPB) Surgery. Comment On: "Factors Influencing Prophylactic Surgical Intervention in Women With Genetic Predisposition for Breast Cancer". Impact of Preoperative Counseling and Education on Decreasing Anxiety in Patients With Gynecologic Tumors: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Care Patterns and Outcomes for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma by Rurality of Patient Residence in a Midwestern State.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1