Abrianna S Robles,Zachary A Rockov,Melissa M Gross,Brett A Ewing,Charles M Lieder,Brian M Weatherford,Ashley E Levack,John M Garlich,Justin M Haller,Jeffrey S Earhart,Geoffrey S Marecek
{"title":"仰卧内收踝关节骨折患者胫骨前外侧骺板受累的影像学准确性。","authors":"Abrianna S Robles,Zachary A Rockov,Melissa M Gross,Brett A Ewing,Charles M Lieder,Brian M Weatherford,Ashley E Levack,John M Garlich,Justin M Haller,Jeffrey S Earhart,Geoffrey S Marecek","doi":"10.1097/bot.0000000000002911","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVES\r\nTo evaluate the incidence of anterolateral tibial plafond involvement in pronation-abduction (PAB) ankle fractures and analyze the accuracy of radiographs in detecting anterolateral tibial plafond involvement, impaction, and predicting the need for direct visualization and an articular reduction.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nDesign: A multi-institutional retrospective chart review.\r\n\r\nSETTING\r\nFive level 1 trauma centers in the United States.\r\n\r\nPATIENT SELECTION CRITERIA\r\nAdult patients with PAB ankle fractures (OTA/AO 44B2.3, 44C2.2, 44C2.3) from 2020-2022 were reviewed by 7 fellowship-trained orthopedic trauma surgeons. They were queried about the presence of anterolateral tibial plafond involvement and impaction, and whether they would need direct visualization and an articular reduction using both radiographs and CT.\r\n\r\nOUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND COMPARISONS\r\nThe presence of anterolateral tibial plafond impaction was tabulated separately using radiographs and CT scans. The accuracy of radiographs and changes in surgical plan after CT review were calculated using CT as the gold standard.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\n61 fractures in 61 patients were evaluated with CT and/or plain radiographs. Using plain radiographs, anterolateral tibial plafond involvement and impaction were identified in 61% and 36% of cases, respectively. In the 38 fractures with both plain radiographs and CT scans, anterolateral tibial plafond involvement was identified in 66% of radiographs and 74% of CT scans (p = 0.4). Plafond impaction was identified in 42% of plain radiographs and 37% of CT scans (p = 0.62). There was no difference in the rate of involvement between radiographs and CT scan. The diagnosis of anterolateral tibial plafond impaction using plain radiographs was correct in 74% of fractures when compared to CT imaging, resulting in a sensitivity of 71%, a specificity of 75%, a positive predictive value (PPV) of 62%, and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 82%. Plain radiographs correctly predicted the need for direct visualization and an articular reduction in 74% of cases and had a PPV of 59% and a NPV of 86%.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nAnterolateral tibial plafond involvement and impaction was present on CT in 74% and 37% of pronation-abduction (PAB) ankle fractures, respectively. Plain radiographs had higher NPV for identifying impaction and the need for articular reduction than they did sensitivity, specificity or PPV. CT is an important tool for preoperative planning that should be considered when planning for operative fixation of PAB ankle fractures.\r\n\r\nLEVEL OF EVIDENCE\r\nPrognostic level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.","PeriodicalId":16644,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma","volume":"43 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Radiographic Accuracy of Identifying Anterolateral Tibial Plafond Involvement in Pronation Abduction Ankle Fractures.\",\"authors\":\"Abrianna S Robles,Zachary A Rockov,Melissa M Gross,Brett A Ewing,Charles M Lieder,Brian M Weatherford,Ashley E Levack,John M Garlich,Justin M Haller,Jeffrey S Earhart,Geoffrey S Marecek\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/bot.0000000000002911\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"OBJECTIVES\\r\\nTo evaluate the incidence of anterolateral tibial plafond involvement in pronation-abduction (PAB) ankle fractures and analyze the accuracy of radiographs in detecting anterolateral tibial plafond involvement, impaction, and predicting the need for direct visualization and an articular reduction.\\r\\n\\r\\nMETHODS\\r\\nDesign: A multi-institutional retrospective chart review.\\r\\n\\r\\nSETTING\\r\\nFive level 1 trauma centers in the United States.\\r\\n\\r\\nPATIENT SELECTION CRITERIA\\r\\nAdult patients with PAB ankle fractures (OTA/AO 44B2.3, 44C2.2, 44C2.3) from 2020-2022 were reviewed by 7 fellowship-trained orthopedic trauma surgeons. They were queried about the presence of anterolateral tibial plafond involvement and impaction, and whether they would need direct visualization and an articular reduction using both radiographs and CT.\\r\\n\\r\\nOUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND COMPARISONS\\r\\nThe presence of anterolateral tibial plafond impaction was tabulated separately using radiographs and CT scans. The accuracy of radiographs and changes in surgical plan after CT review were calculated using CT as the gold standard.\\r\\n\\r\\nRESULTS\\r\\n61 fractures in 61 patients were evaluated with CT and/or plain radiographs. Using plain radiographs, anterolateral tibial plafond involvement and impaction were identified in 61% and 36% of cases, respectively. In the 38 fractures with both plain radiographs and CT scans, anterolateral tibial plafond involvement was identified in 66% of radiographs and 74% of CT scans (p = 0.4). Plafond impaction was identified in 42% of plain radiographs and 37% of CT scans (p = 0.62). There was no difference in the rate of involvement between radiographs and CT scan. The diagnosis of anterolateral tibial plafond impaction using plain radiographs was correct in 74% of fractures when compared to CT imaging, resulting in a sensitivity of 71%, a specificity of 75%, a positive predictive value (PPV) of 62%, and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 82%. Plain radiographs correctly predicted the need for direct visualization and an articular reduction in 74% of cases and had a PPV of 59% and a NPV of 86%.\\r\\n\\r\\nCONCLUSIONS\\r\\nAnterolateral tibial plafond involvement and impaction was present on CT in 74% and 37% of pronation-abduction (PAB) ankle fractures, respectively. Plain radiographs had higher NPV for identifying impaction and the need for articular reduction than they did sensitivity, specificity or PPV. CT is an important tool for preoperative planning that should be considered when planning for operative fixation of PAB ankle fractures.\\r\\n\\r\\nLEVEL OF EVIDENCE\\r\\nPrognostic level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16644,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/bot.0000000000002911\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/bot.0000000000002911","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Radiographic Accuracy of Identifying Anterolateral Tibial Plafond Involvement in Pronation Abduction Ankle Fractures.
OBJECTIVES
To evaluate the incidence of anterolateral tibial plafond involvement in pronation-abduction (PAB) ankle fractures and analyze the accuracy of radiographs in detecting anterolateral tibial plafond involvement, impaction, and predicting the need for direct visualization and an articular reduction.
METHODS
Design: A multi-institutional retrospective chart review.
SETTING
Five level 1 trauma centers in the United States.
PATIENT SELECTION CRITERIA
Adult patients with PAB ankle fractures (OTA/AO 44B2.3, 44C2.2, 44C2.3) from 2020-2022 were reviewed by 7 fellowship-trained orthopedic trauma surgeons. They were queried about the presence of anterolateral tibial plafond involvement and impaction, and whether they would need direct visualization and an articular reduction using both radiographs and CT.
OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND COMPARISONS
The presence of anterolateral tibial plafond impaction was tabulated separately using radiographs and CT scans. The accuracy of radiographs and changes in surgical plan after CT review were calculated using CT as the gold standard.
RESULTS
61 fractures in 61 patients were evaluated with CT and/or plain radiographs. Using plain radiographs, anterolateral tibial plafond involvement and impaction were identified in 61% and 36% of cases, respectively. In the 38 fractures with both plain radiographs and CT scans, anterolateral tibial plafond involvement was identified in 66% of radiographs and 74% of CT scans (p = 0.4). Plafond impaction was identified in 42% of plain radiographs and 37% of CT scans (p = 0.62). There was no difference in the rate of involvement between radiographs and CT scan. The diagnosis of anterolateral tibial plafond impaction using plain radiographs was correct in 74% of fractures when compared to CT imaging, resulting in a sensitivity of 71%, a specificity of 75%, a positive predictive value (PPV) of 62%, and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 82%. Plain radiographs correctly predicted the need for direct visualization and an articular reduction in 74% of cases and had a PPV of 59% and a NPV of 86%.
CONCLUSIONS
Anterolateral tibial plafond involvement and impaction was present on CT in 74% and 37% of pronation-abduction (PAB) ankle fractures, respectively. Plain radiographs had higher NPV for identifying impaction and the need for articular reduction than they did sensitivity, specificity or PPV. CT is an important tool for preoperative planning that should be considered when planning for operative fixation of PAB ankle fractures.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
Prognostic level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma is devoted exclusively to the diagnosis and management of hard and soft tissue trauma, including injuries to bone, muscle, ligament, and tendons, as well as spinal cord injuries. Under the guidance of a distinguished international board of editors, the journal provides the most current information on diagnostic techniques, new and improved surgical instruments and procedures, surgical implants and prosthetic devices, bioplastics and biometals; and physical therapy and rehabilitation.