后向运动跑步机训练对脑卒中幸存者行走和平衡能力的影响:随机临床试验

Oluwole O. Awosika, Colin Drury, Amanda Garver, Pierce Boyne, Heidi Sucharew, Emily Wasik, Amit Bhattacharya, Kari Dunning, Pooja Khatri, Brett Kissela
{"title":"后向运动跑步机训练对脑卒中幸存者行走和平衡能力的影响:随机临床试验","authors":"Oluwole O. Awosika, Colin Drury, Amanda Garver, Pierce Boyne, Heidi Sucharew, Emily Wasik, Amit Bhattacharya, Kari Dunning, Pooja Khatri, Brett Kissela","doi":"10.1101/2024.09.11.24313519","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Purpose: Walking and balance impairments after stroke are a global health concern, causing significant morbidity and mortality. However, effective strategies for achieving meaningful recovery in the chronic stages are limited. Backward locomotor treadmill training (BLTT) is a novel walking rehabilitation protocol that is safe, feasible, and likely beneficial in stroke survivors; however, its efficacy has not been tested. This single-center, randomized, assessor-blind clinical trial aims to test the preliminary efficacy of BLTT compared to forward locomotor treadmill training (FLTT) on walking speed, symmetry, and postural stability. Methods: Forty stroke survivors [BLTT (N=19), FLTT (N=21); mean age= 56.3 ? 8.6 years; 53% Female; 30% Non-Hispanic Black] with mild-moderate walking impairment were enrolled. Participants underwent nine 30-minute BLTT or FLTT sessions over three weeks. The primary outcome was the mean change in the 10-meter walk test (10 MWT) at 24 hours post-training (24 hr POST). Secondary outcome measures were changes in spatiotemporal walking symmetry and postural stability during quiet standing at 24 hr POST. Retention was explored at Days 30- and 90 POST. Results: We report clinically meaningful (? 0.16 m/s) improvements in overground walking speed at 24 hr POST, with retention up to Day 90 POST with BLTT and FLTT. However, contrary to our working hypothesis, no between-group differences in walking speed were observed. Nonetheless, we found that BLTT resulted in offline improvements in spatial symmetry and retention of subcomponents of the modified clinical test of sensory interaction on balance (mCTSIB), including the testing of proprio-vestibular integration up to Day 30 POST. Conclusion: Among chronic stroke patients with mild-moderate walking impairment, BLTT and FLTT both resulted in long-lasting and clinically meaningful improvement in walking speed. However, preliminary findings suggest that BLTT may better comprehensively target walking asymmetry and sensory systems processing and integration.","PeriodicalId":501453,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy","volume":"80 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Backward Locomotor Treadmill Training on Walking and Balance Outcomes in Stroke Survivors: A Randomized Clinical Trial\",\"authors\":\"Oluwole O. Awosika, Colin Drury, Amanda Garver, Pierce Boyne, Heidi Sucharew, Emily Wasik, Amit Bhattacharya, Kari Dunning, Pooja Khatri, Brett Kissela\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2024.09.11.24313519\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background and Purpose: Walking and balance impairments after stroke are a global health concern, causing significant morbidity and mortality. However, effective strategies for achieving meaningful recovery in the chronic stages are limited. Backward locomotor treadmill training (BLTT) is a novel walking rehabilitation protocol that is safe, feasible, and likely beneficial in stroke survivors; however, its efficacy has not been tested. This single-center, randomized, assessor-blind clinical trial aims to test the preliminary efficacy of BLTT compared to forward locomotor treadmill training (FLTT) on walking speed, symmetry, and postural stability. Methods: Forty stroke survivors [BLTT (N=19), FLTT (N=21); mean age= 56.3 ? 8.6 years; 53% Female; 30% Non-Hispanic Black] with mild-moderate walking impairment were enrolled. Participants underwent nine 30-minute BLTT or FLTT sessions over three weeks. The primary outcome was the mean change in the 10-meter walk test (10 MWT) at 24 hours post-training (24 hr POST). Secondary outcome measures were changes in spatiotemporal walking symmetry and postural stability during quiet standing at 24 hr POST. Retention was explored at Days 30- and 90 POST. Results: We report clinically meaningful (? 0.16 m/s) improvements in overground walking speed at 24 hr POST, with retention up to Day 90 POST with BLTT and FLTT. However, contrary to our working hypothesis, no between-group differences in walking speed were observed. Nonetheless, we found that BLTT resulted in offline improvements in spatial symmetry and retention of subcomponents of the modified clinical test of sensory interaction on balance (mCTSIB), including the testing of proprio-vestibular integration up to Day 30 POST. Conclusion: Among chronic stroke patients with mild-moderate walking impairment, BLTT and FLTT both resulted in long-lasting and clinically meaningful improvement in walking speed. However, preliminary findings suggest that BLTT may better comprehensively target walking asymmetry and sensory systems processing and integration.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501453,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"medRxiv - Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy\",\"volume\":\"80 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"medRxiv - Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.11.24313519\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.11.24313519","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:中风后行走和平衡障碍是全球关注的健康问题,会导致严重的发病率和死亡率。然而,在慢性期实现有意义康复的有效策略却很有限。后向运动跑步机训练(BLTT)是一种新颖的步行康复方案,安全、可行且可能对中风幸存者有益;但其疗效尚未得到测试。这项单中心、随机、评估者盲法临床试验旨在测试后向运动跑步机训练(BLTT)与前向运动跑步机训练(FLTT)相比,对步行速度、对称性和姿势稳定性的初步疗效。招募了 40 名有轻度-中度行走障碍的中风幸存者[BLTT(19 人),FLTT(21 人);平均年龄 56.3 ? 8.6 岁;53% 女性;30% 非西班牙裔黑人]。参与者在三周内接受了九次 30 分钟的 BLTT 或 FLTT 训练。主要结果是训练后 24 小时(24 hr POST)10 米步行测试(10 MWT)的平均变化。次要结果指标是训练后 24 小时安静站立时步行的时空对称性和姿势稳定性的变化。在训练后第 30 天和第 90 天,对训练效果的保持情况进行考察。结果:我们的报告显示,BLTT 和 FLTT 患者在术后 24 小时的地面行走速度得到了有临床意义的改善(? 0.16 m/s),并保持到术后第 90 天。然而,与我们的工作假设相反,在步行速度方面没有观察到组间差异。尽管如此,我们发现 BLTT 在空间对称性和改良临床平衡感觉互动测试(mCTSIB)子项目的保持方面带来了脱机改善,包括本体-前庭整合测试,直至术后第 30 天。结论在有轻度-中度步行障碍的慢性中风患者中,BLTT 和 FLTT 都能使步行速度得到持久且有临床意义的改善。然而,初步研究结果表明,BLTT 可更好地全面针对行走不对称和感觉系统处理与整合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Backward Locomotor Treadmill Training on Walking and Balance Outcomes in Stroke Survivors: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Background and Purpose: Walking and balance impairments after stroke are a global health concern, causing significant morbidity and mortality. However, effective strategies for achieving meaningful recovery in the chronic stages are limited. Backward locomotor treadmill training (BLTT) is a novel walking rehabilitation protocol that is safe, feasible, and likely beneficial in stroke survivors; however, its efficacy has not been tested. This single-center, randomized, assessor-blind clinical trial aims to test the preliminary efficacy of BLTT compared to forward locomotor treadmill training (FLTT) on walking speed, symmetry, and postural stability. Methods: Forty stroke survivors [BLTT (N=19), FLTT (N=21); mean age= 56.3 ? 8.6 years; 53% Female; 30% Non-Hispanic Black] with mild-moderate walking impairment were enrolled. Participants underwent nine 30-minute BLTT or FLTT sessions over three weeks. The primary outcome was the mean change in the 10-meter walk test (10 MWT) at 24 hours post-training (24 hr POST). Secondary outcome measures were changes in spatiotemporal walking symmetry and postural stability during quiet standing at 24 hr POST. Retention was explored at Days 30- and 90 POST. Results: We report clinically meaningful (? 0.16 m/s) improvements in overground walking speed at 24 hr POST, with retention up to Day 90 POST with BLTT and FLTT. However, contrary to our working hypothesis, no between-group differences in walking speed were observed. Nonetheless, we found that BLTT resulted in offline improvements in spatial symmetry and retention of subcomponents of the modified clinical test of sensory interaction on balance (mCTSIB), including the testing of proprio-vestibular integration up to Day 30 POST. Conclusion: Among chronic stroke patients with mild-moderate walking impairment, BLTT and FLTT both resulted in long-lasting and clinically meaningful improvement in walking speed. However, preliminary findings suggest that BLTT may better comprehensively target walking asymmetry and sensory systems processing and integration.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
CROSS-SECTIONAL ANALYSIS: INTERPRETATION OF NON-STATISTICALLY SIGNIFICANT RESULTS IN RANDOMISED CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS IN REHABILITATION Targeted deep brain stimulation of the motor thalamus improves speech and swallowing motor functions after cerebral lesions Normal feeding movements expressed by dimensionality reduction of whole-body joint motions using principal component analysis Impact of early postoperative ambulation on gait recovery after hip fracture surgery: A multicenter cohort study Backward Locomotor Treadmill Training on Walking and Balance Outcomes in Stroke Survivors: A Randomized Clinical Trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1