用于测量低压等离子体中数量密度的光学致动测量法:优势、误差源和方法验证

IF 2.7 3区 物理与天体物理 Q2 PHYSICS, APPLIED Journal of Applied Physics Pub Date : 2024-09-18 DOI:10.1063/5.0227576
Nikolay Britun, Michael K. T. Mo, Shih-Nan Hsiao, Fatima J. T. Arellano, Makoto Sekine, Masaru Hori
{"title":"用于测量低压等离子体中数量密度的光学致动测量法:优势、误差源和方法验证","authors":"Nikolay Britun, Michael K. T. Mo, Shih-Nan Hsiao, Fatima J. T. Arellano, Makoto Sekine, Masaru Hori","doi":"10.1063/5.0227576","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Number density of plasma-generated atoms or molecules is an important parameter for both fundamental research and applications. It can be measured in a straightforward manner, using vacuum-ultraviolet absorption spectroscopy, which is mainly possible in laboratory conditions as it may require bulky equipment, such as lasers. By contrast, optical actinometry is an alternative approach that only uses spontaneous emission from the plasma. This technique relies on the so-called corona excitation and uses emission line ratios between the gases with unknown and known concentrations (called actinometer in the last case). As a result of using line ratios, the additional density calibration is not required if the excitation cross sections are known. This study discusses Ar-based actinometry in low-pressure (roughly <1 kPa) plasma discharges with an emphasis on multiple line ratios. The work is particularly focused on the method’s applicability, the choice of Ar cross sections, and potential error sources. The influence of the additional excitation mechanisms is analyzed based on both experiments and modeling. The optical transitions for F, O, H, N, and P atoms along with expressions for their number density are presented, not requiring high optical resolution for measurements. For the sake of method validation, it is shown that in low-pressure radiofrequency discharges, a nearly excellent agreement between the actinometry data and the calibrated measurements can be achieved by careful selection of optical transitions.","PeriodicalId":15088,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Physics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optical actinometry for number density measurements in low-pressure plasmas: Advantages, error sources, and method validation\",\"authors\":\"Nikolay Britun, Michael K. T. Mo, Shih-Nan Hsiao, Fatima J. T. Arellano, Makoto Sekine, Masaru Hori\",\"doi\":\"10.1063/5.0227576\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Number density of plasma-generated atoms or molecules is an important parameter for both fundamental research and applications. It can be measured in a straightforward manner, using vacuum-ultraviolet absorption spectroscopy, which is mainly possible in laboratory conditions as it may require bulky equipment, such as lasers. By contrast, optical actinometry is an alternative approach that only uses spontaneous emission from the plasma. This technique relies on the so-called corona excitation and uses emission line ratios between the gases with unknown and known concentrations (called actinometer in the last case). As a result of using line ratios, the additional density calibration is not required if the excitation cross sections are known. This study discusses Ar-based actinometry in low-pressure (roughly <1 kPa) plasma discharges with an emphasis on multiple line ratios. The work is particularly focused on the method’s applicability, the choice of Ar cross sections, and potential error sources. The influence of the additional excitation mechanisms is analyzed based on both experiments and modeling. The optical transitions for F, O, H, N, and P atoms along with expressions for their number density are presented, not requiring high optical resolution for measurements. For the sake of method validation, it is shown that in low-pressure radiofrequency discharges, a nearly excellent agreement between the actinometry data and the calibrated measurements can be achieved by careful selection of optical transitions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15088,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Applied Physics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Applied Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"101\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0227576\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"物理与天体物理\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSICS, APPLIED\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Physics","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0227576","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHYSICS, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

等离子体产生的原子或分子的数量密度是基础研究和应用的重要参数。它可以用真空紫外吸收光谱法进行直接测量,但由于可能需要激光等笨重的设备,这种方法主要只能在实验室条件下使用。相比之下,光学锕系元素测量法是一种只利用等离子体自发辐射的替代方法。这种技术依赖于所谓的电晕激发,并使用未知浓度气体和已知浓度气体之间的发射线比率(在最后一种情况下称为放线仪)。由于使用了线比,如果已知激发截面,就不需要额外的密度校准。本研究讨论了低压(大约 1 kPa)等离子体放电中基于氩的放电测量法,重点是多线比。这项工作尤其关注该方法的适用性、氩截面的选择以及潜在的误差源。根据实验和建模分析了附加激发机制的影响。在不要求高光学分辨率测量的情况下,介绍了 F、O、H、N 和 P 原子的光学跃迁及其数量密度表达式。为了验证方法,研究表明在低压射频放电中,通过仔细选择光学跃迁,可以实现放电测量数据与校准测量数据之间近乎完美的一致性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Optical actinometry for number density measurements in low-pressure plasmas: Advantages, error sources, and method validation
Number density of plasma-generated atoms or molecules is an important parameter for both fundamental research and applications. It can be measured in a straightforward manner, using vacuum-ultraviolet absorption spectroscopy, which is mainly possible in laboratory conditions as it may require bulky equipment, such as lasers. By contrast, optical actinometry is an alternative approach that only uses spontaneous emission from the plasma. This technique relies on the so-called corona excitation and uses emission line ratios between the gases with unknown and known concentrations (called actinometer in the last case). As a result of using line ratios, the additional density calibration is not required if the excitation cross sections are known. This study discusses Ar-based actinometry in low-pressure (roughly <1 kPa) plasma discharges with an emphasis on multiple line ratios. The work is particularly focused on the method’s applicability, the choice of Ar cross sections, and potential error sources. The influence of the additional excitation mechanisms is analyzed based on both experiments and modeling. The optical transitions for F, O, H, N, and P atoms along with expressions for their number density are presented, not requiring high optical resolution for measurements. For the sake of method validation, it is shown that in low-pressure radiofrequency discharges, a nearly excellent agreement between the actinometry data and the calibrated measurements can be achieved by careful selection of optical transitions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Applied Physics
Journal of Applied Physics 物理-物理:应用
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
9.40%
发文量
1534
审稿时长
2.3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Applied Physics (JAP) is an influential international journal publishing significant new experimental and theoretical results of applied physics research. Topics covered in JAP are diverse and reflect the most current applied physics research, including: Dielectrics, ferroelectrics, and multiferroics- Electrical discharges, plasmas, and plasma-surface interactions- Emerging, interdisciplinary, and other fields of applied physics- Magnetism, spintronics, and superconductivity- Organic-Inorganic systems, including organic electronics- Photonics, plasmonics, photovoltaics, lasers, optical materials, and phenomena- Physics of devices and sensors- Physics of materials, including electrical, thermal, mechanical and other properties- Physics of matter under extreme conditions- Physics of nanoscale and low-dimensional systems, including atomic and quantum phenomena- Physics of semiconductors- Soft matter, fluids, and biophysics- Thin films, interfaces, and surfaces
期刊最新文献
Fast inverse design of microwave and infrared Bi-stealth metamaterials based on equivalent circuit model Calibration of Jones–Wilkins–Lee equation of state for unreacted explosives with shock Hugoniot relationship and optimization algorithm Impulse coupling enhancement of aluminum targets under laser irradiation in a soft polymer confined geometry Optimal demodulation domain for microwave SQUID multiplexers in presence of readout system noise Numerical simulation of He atmospheric pressure plasma jet impinging on the tilted dielectric surface
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1