{"title":"血管内动静脉瘘是血液透析患者的可行替代方案吗?","authors":"Hugo Vergara-Pérez,Raúl Diaitz-Usetxi Laplaza,Alejandro Pérez Alba,Pablo Baliño Remiro,Asunción Rius Peris,M Ángeles Fenollosa Segarra,Alejandro Tamayo Vasquez,Javier Reque","doi":"10.1159/000541233","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION\r\nFor hemodialysis (HD) patients, the selection of vascular access (VA) is a crucial factor that significantly affects morbidity and mortality. Historically, native Arteriovenous Fistulas (AVFs) have been established using surgical techniques. However, devices facilitating percutaneous endovascular arteriovenous fistula formation have recently been introduced in clinical practice, showing promising initial evidence. The primary objectives were technical success, efficacy, and cannulation rates. The secondary objectives included primary and cumulative patency, safety, and the number of procedures required to maintain fistula patency.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nA prospective, single-center, single-arm study that included all patients who underwent endovascular arteriovenous fistulas (endoAVF) creation using the WavelinQ™ EndoAVF System at a University Hospital between December 2021 and August 2023.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nA total of 20 patients who underwent an endoAVF were included. Technical success was 100%. 75% (15) of the endoAVFs met the criteria for physiological suitability. The cannulation rate was 66% (10/15) for endoAVFs that reached physiological suitability. At 6 months of follow-up, the primary and cumulative patency rates were 65% and 75%, respectively; at 12 months, these were 50% and 70%, respectively. Serious adverse events were not observed. The reintervention rate was 0.33 procedures/patient-year.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nBased on our experience, creating AVFs using the WavelinQ 4-F EndoAVF system is safe and effective, with high technical success rates and acceptable patency and reintervention rates.","PeriodicalId":8953,"journal":{"name":"Blood Purification","volume":"1 1","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is endovascular arteriovenous fistula a feasible alternative for hemodialysis patients?\",\"authors\":\"Hugo Vergara-Pérez,Raúl Diaitz-Usetxi Laplaza,Alejandro Pérez Alba,Pablo Baliño Remiro,Asunción Rius Peris,M Ángeles Fenollosa Segarra,Alejandro Tamayo Vasquez,Javier Reque\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000541233\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"INTRODUCTION\\r\\nFor hemodialysis (HD) patients, the selection of vascular access (VA) is a crucial factor that significantly affects morbidity and mortality. Historically, native Arteriovenous Fistulas (AVFs) have been established using surgical techniques. However, devices facilitating percutaneous endovascular arteriovenous fistula formation have recently been introduced in clinical practice, showing promising initial evidence. The primary objectives were technical success, efficacy, and cannulation rates. The secondary objectives included primary and cumulative patency, safety, and the number of procedures required to maintain fistula patency.\\r\\n\\r\\nMETHODS\\r\\nA prospective, single-center, single-arm study that included all patients who underwent endovascular arteriovenous fistulas (endoAVF) creation using the WavelinQ™ EndoAVF System at a University Hospital between December 2021 and August 2023.\\r\\n\\r\\nRESULTS\\r\\nA total of 20 patients who underwent an endoAVF were included. Technical success was 100%. 75% (15) of the endoAVFs met the criteria for physiological suitability. The cannulation rate was 66% (10/15) for endoAVFs that reached physiological suitability. At 6 months of follow-up, the primary and cumulative patency rates were 65% and 75%, respectively; at 12 months, these were 50% and 70%, respectively. Serious adverse events were not observed. The reintervention rate was 0.33 procedures/patient-year.\\r\\n\\r\\nCONCLUSION\\r\\nBased on our experience, creating AVFs using the WavelinQ 4-F EndoAVF system is safe and effective, with high technical success rates and acceptable patency and reintervention rates.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8953,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Blood Purification\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"1-15\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Blood Purification\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000541233\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blood Purification","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000541233","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Is endovascular arteriovenous fistula a feasible alternative for hemodialysis patients?
INTRODUCTION
For hemodialysis (HD) patients, the selection of vascular access (VA) is a crucial factor that significantly affects morbidity and mortality. Historically, native Arteriovenous Fistulas (AVFs) have been established using surgical techniques. However, devices facilitating percutaneous endovascular arteriovenous fistula formation have recently been introduced in clinical practice, showing promising initial evidence. The primary objectives were technical success, efficacy, and cannulation rates. The secondary objectives included primary and cumulative patency, safety, and the number of procedures required to maintain fistula patency.
METHODS
A prospective, single-center, single-arm study that included all patients who underwent endovascular arteriovenous fistulas (endoAVF) creation using the WavelinQ™ EndoAVF System at a University Hospital between December 2021 and August 2023.
RESULTS
A total of 20 patients who underwent an endoAVF were included. Technical success was 100%. 75% (15) of the endoAVFs met the criteria for physiological suitability. The cannulation rate was 66% (10/15) for endoAVFs that reached physiological suitability. At 6 months of follow-up, the primary and cumulative patency rates were 65% and 75%, respectively; at 12 months, these were 50% and 70%, respectively. Serious adverse events were not observed. The reintervention rate was 0.33 procedures/patient-year.
CONCLUSION
Based on our experience, creating AVFs using the WavelinQ 4-F EndoAVF system is safe and effective, with high technical success rates and acceptable patency and reintervention rates.
期刊介绍:
Practical information on hemodialysis, hemofiltration, peritoneal dialysis and apheresis is featured in this journal. Recognizing the critical importance of equipment and procedures, particular emphasis has been placed on reports, drawn from a wide range of fields, describing technical advances and improvements in methodology. Papers reflect the search for cost-effective solutions which increase not only patient survival but also patient comfort and disease improvement through prevention or correction of undesirable effects. Advances in vascular access and blood anticoagulation, problems associated with exposure of blood to foreign surfaces and acute-care nephrology, including continuous therapies, also receive attention. Nephrologists, internists, intensivists and hospital staff involved in dialysis, apheresis and immunoadsorption for acute and chronic solid organ failure will find this journal useful and informative. ''Blood Purification'' also serves as a platform for multidisciplinary experiences involving nephrologists, cardiologists and critical care physicians in order to expand the level of interaction between different disciplines and specialities.