黑人和白人乳腺癌患者的信任:提高癌症护理可信度的机会

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Clinical breast cancer Pub Date : 2024-08-30 DOI:10.1016/j.clbc.2024.08.019
Vanessa B. Sheppard , Fariha Tariq , Dustin Bastiach , Malik Philips , Robert Winn , Megan C. Edmonds , Hayley S. Thompson
{"title":"黑人和白人乳腺癌患者的信任:提高癌症护理可信度的机会","authors":"Vanessa B. Sheppard ,&nbsp;Fariha Tariq ,&nbsp;Dustin Bastiach ,&nbsp;Malik Philips ,&nbsp;Robert Winn ,&nbsp;Megan C. Edmonds ,&nbsp;Hayley S. Thompson","doi":"10.1016/j.clbc.2024.08.019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>This study evaluated the relationships between patient and cancer delivery factors with trust in oncology providers in a racial/ethnically diverse group of cancer patients.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Data were analyzed from a prospective cohort study of women with hormone receptor positive (HR+) breast cancer. A standardized survey collected validated measures of trust in providers, psychosocial factors, and cancer care delivery factors. Multivariable logistic regression models and race-stratified models were employed to calculate odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals associated with trust.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the 567 participants, 28% identified as Black and the rest were White. Compared to White women Black women reported lower trust in providers. Four domains of cancer care delivery were significantly associated with patients’ higher trust in their providers: <em>general satisfaction with care</em> (<em>P</em> &lt; .0001), <em>technical quality</em> of the provider (<em>P</em> &lt; .001), <em>interpersonal manner</em> of the provider (<em>P</em> = .0008) and provider <em>communication (P</em> = .0010). Race-stratified models revealed 2 significant cancer care delivery domains for both groups (ie, <em>general satisfaction</em> and <em>interpersonal</em>) and 2 care domains (<em>technical quality</em> and <em>communication</em>) that were only significant among White women.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Efforts are needed to nurture trusting relationships between Black women and their oncology providers. Factors related to the organization and delivery of cancer care are modifiable targets for interventions as these were robust predictors of patient trust regardless of a woman's self-reported race. Investments in strategies that strengthen the structure and organization of care towards a structures of trust worthiness may better support providers and patients and ultimately reduce cancer care disparities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10197,"journal":{"name":"Clinical breast cancer","volume":"24 8","pages":"Pages e748-e756"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trust in Black and White Breast Cancer Patients: Opportunities to Enhance Trustworthiness in Cancer Care\",\"authors\":\"Vanessa B. Sheppard ,&nbsp;Fariha Tariq ,&nbsp;Dustin Bastiach ,&nbsp;Malik Philips ,&nbsp;Robert Winn ,&nbsp;Megan C. Edmonds ,&nbsp;Hayley S. Thompson\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clbc.2024.08.019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>This study evaluated the relationships between patient and cancer delivery factors with trust in oncology providers in a racial/ethnically diverse group of cancer patients.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Data were analyzed from a prospective cohort study of women with hormone receptor positive (HR+) breast cancer. A standardized survey collected validated measures of trust in providers, psychosocial factors, and cancer care delivery factors. Multivariable logistic regression models and race-stratified models were employed to calculate odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals associated with trust.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the 567 participants, 28% identified as Black and the rest were White. Compared to White women Black women reported lower trust in providers. Four domains of cancer care delivery were significantly associated with patients’ higher trust in their providers: <em>general satisfaction with care</em> (<em>P</em> &lt; .0001), <em>technical quality</em> of the provider (<em>P</em> &lt; .001), <em>interpersonal manner</em> of the provider (<em>P</em> = .0008) and provider <em>communication (P</em> = .0010). Race-stratified models revealed 2 significant cancer care delivery domains for both groups (ie, <em>general satisfaction</em> and <em>interpersonal</em>) and 2 care domains (<em>technical quality</em> and <em>communication</em>) that were only significant among White women.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Efforts are needed to nurture trusting relationships between Black women and their oncology providers. Factors related to the organization and delivery of cancer care are modifiable targets for interventions as these were robust predictors of patient trust regardless of a woman's self-reported race. Investments in strategies that strengthen the structure and organization of care towards a structures of trust worthiness may better support providers and patients and ultimately reduce cancer care disparities.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10197,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical breast cancer\",\"volume\":\"24 8\",\"pages\":\"Pages e748-e756\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical breast cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1526820924002313\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical breast cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1526820924002313","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究评估了不同种族/族裔癌症患者群体中患者和癌症治疗因素与肿瘤治疗提供者信任度之间的关系。研究分析了一项针对激素受体阳性(HR+)乳腺癌女性患者的前瞻性队列研究的数据。一项标准化调查收集了对医疗服务提供者的信任、社会心理因素和癌症护理提供因素的有效测量。研究采用多变量逻辑回归模型和种族分层模型来计算与信任度相关的几率比和 95% 的置信区间。在 567 名参与者中,28% 被认定为黑人,其余为白人。与白人妇女相比,黑人妇女对医疗服务提供者的信任度较低。癌症护理服务的四个领域与患者对服务提供者的较高信任度明显相关:(<.0001)、对服务提供者的信任度(<.001)、对服务提供者的信任度(=.0008)和对服务提供者的信任度(=.0010)。种族分层模型显示,两个群体都有两个重要的癌症护理提供领域(即和),还有两个护理领域(和)仅在白人妇女中具有重要意义。需要努力培养黑人妇女与其肿瘤治疗提供者之间的信任关系。与癌症治疗的组织和提供相关的因素是可调整的干预目标,因为这些因素是患者信任度的有力预测因素,与女性自我报告的种族无关。投资于加强护理结构和组织的战略,以建立值得信任的结构,可以更好地支持服务提供者和患者,并最终减少癌症护理差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Trust in Black and White Breast Cancer Patients: Opportunities to Enhance Trustworthiness in Cancer Care

Introduction

This study evaluated the relationships between patient and cancer delivery factors with trust in oncology providers in a racial/ethnically diverse group of cancer patients.

Methods

Data were analyzed from a prospective cohort study of women with hormone receptor positive (HR+) breast cancer. A standardized survey collected validated measures of trust in providers, psychosocial factors, and cancer care delivery factors. Multivariable logistic regression models and race-stratified models were employed to calculate odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals associated with trust.

Results

Of the 567 participants, 28% identified as Black and the rest were White. Compared to White women Black women reported lower trust in providers. Four domains of cancer care delivery were significantly associated with patients’ higher trust in their providers: general satisfaction with care (P < .0001), technical quality of the provider (P < .001), interpersonal manner of the provider (P = .0008) and provider communication (P = .0010). Race-stratified models revealed 2 significant cancer care delivery domains for both groups (ie, general satisfaction and interpersonal) and 2 care domains (technical quality and communication) that were only significant among White women.

Conclusion

Efforts are needed to nurture trusting relationships between Black women and their oncology providers. Factors related to the organization and delivery of cancer care are modifiable targets for interventions as these were robust predictors of patient trust regardless of a woman's self-reported race. Investments in strategies that strengthen the structure and organization of care towards a structures of trust worthiness may better support providers and patients and ultimately reduce cancer care disparities.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical breast cancer
Clinical breast cancer 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.20%
发文量
174
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Breast Cancer is a peer-reviewed bimonthly journal that publishes original articles describing various aspects of clinical and translational research of breast cancer. Clinical Breast Cancer is devoted to articles on detection, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of breast cancer. The main emphasis is on recent scientific developments in all areas related to breast cancer. Specific areas of interest include clinical research reports from various therapeutic modalities, cancer genetics, drug sensitivity and resistance, novel imaging, tumor genomics, biomarkers, and chemoprevention strategies.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Table of Contents Clinical and Imaging Features Associated With Malignant Focal Nonmass Enhancement on Breast MRI. Real-World Outcomes of Pyrotinib-Based Therapy for HER2-Positive Breast Cancer With Brain Metastases: A Multicentre, Retrospective Analysis. Another Biosignature for Ductal Carcinoma In Situ-Have We Moved the Needle?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1