使用 "完美 "网络模型评估网络安全软件工具

Jeremy Straub
{"title":"使用 \"完美 \"网络模型评估网络安全软件工具","authors":"Jeremy Straub","doi":"arxiv-2409.09175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cybersecurity software tool evaluation is difficult due to the inherently\nadversarial nature of the field. A penetration testing (or offensive) tool must\nbe tested against a viable defensive adversary and a defensive tool must,\nsimilarly, be tested against a viable offensive adversary. Characterizing the\ntool's performance inherently depends on the quality of the adversary, which\ncan vary from test to test. This paper proposes the use of a 'perfect' network,\nrepresenting computing systems, a network and the attack pathways through it as\na methodology to use for testing cybersecurity decision-making tools. This\nfacilitates testing by providing a known and consistent standard for\ncomparison. It also allows testing to include researcher-selected levels of\nerror, noise and uncertainty to evaluate cybersecurity tools under these\nexperimental conditions.","PeriodicalId":501332,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - CS - Cryptography and Security","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cybersecurity Software Tool Evaluation Using a 'Perfect' Network Model\",\"authors\":\"Jeremy Straub\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2409.09175\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Cybersecurity software tool evaluation is difficult due to the inherently\\nadversarial nature of the field. A penetration testing (or offensive) tool must\\nbe tested against a viable defensive adversary and a defensive tool must,\\nsimilarly, be tested against a viable offensive adversary. Characterizing the\\ntool's performance inherently depends on the quality of the adversary, which\\ncan vary from test to test. This paper proposes the use of a 'perfect' network,\\nrepresenting computing systems, a network and the attack pathways through it as\\na methodology to use for testing cybersecurity decision-making tools. This\\nfacilitates testing by providing a known and consistent standard for\\ncomparison. It also allows testing to include researcher-selected levels of\\nerror, noise and uncertainty to evaluate cybersecurity tools under these\\nexperimental conditions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501332,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - CS - Cryptography and Security\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - CS - Cryptography and Security\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.09175\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - CS - Cryptography and Security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.09175","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

网络安全软件工具评估的难度在于该领域固有的对抗性。渗透测试(或进攻)工具必须针对可行的防御对手进行测试,而防御工具同样必须针对可行的进攻对手进行测试。鉴定工具的性能本质上取决于对手的质量,而对手的质量在不同的测试中会有所不同。本文提出使用 "完美 "网络(代表计算系统、网络和通过网络的攻击路径)作为测试网络安全决策工具的方法。这为测试提供了一个已知的、一致的比较标准。它还允许测试包括研究人员选择的错误、噪音和不确定性水平,以便在这些实验条件下评估网络安全工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Cybersecurity Software Tool Evaluation Using a 'Perfect' Network Model
Cybersecurity software tool evaluation is difficult due to the inherently adversarial nature of the field. A penetration testing (or offensive) tool must be tested against a viable defensive adversary and a defensive tool must, similarly, be tested against a viable offensive adversary. Characterizing the tool's performance inherently depends on the quality of the adversary, which can vary from test to test. This paper proposes the use of a 'perfect' network, representing computing systems, a network and the attack pathways through it as a methodology to use for testing cybersecurity decision-making tools. This facilitates testing by providing a known and consistent standard for comparison. It also allows testing to include researcher-selected levels of error, noise and uncertainty to evaluate cybersecurity tools under these experimental conditions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
PAD-FT: A Lightweight Defense for Backdoor Attacks via Data Purification and Fine-Tuning Artemis: Efficient Commit-and-Prove SNARKs for zkML A Survey-Based Quantitative Analysis of Stress Factors and Their Impacts Among Cybersecurity Professionals Log2graphs: An Unsupervised Framework for Log Anomaly Detection with Efficient Feature Extraction Practical Investigation on the Distinguishability of Longa's Atomic Patterns
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1