培训现场工作人员快速评估疥疮流行率:莫桑比克诊断准确性研究。

Joanna Furnival-Adams,Valeria López,Hansel Mundaca,Amelia Houana,Antonio Macucha,Eldo Elobolobo,Aida Xerinda,Humberto Munguambe,Felisbela Materula,Regina Rabinovich,Francisco Saute,Daniel Engelman,Carlos Chaccour
{"title":"培训现场工作人员快速评估疥疮流行率:莫桑比克诊断准确性研究。","authors":"Joanna Furnival-Adams,Valeria López,Hansel Mundaca,Amelia Houana,Antonio Macucha,Eldo Elobolobo,Aida Xerinda,Humberto Munguambe,Felisbela Materula,Regina Rabinovich,Francisco Saute,Daniel Engelman,Carlos Chaccour","doi":"10.4269/ajtmh.24-0204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Scabies is endemic in many resource-poor tropical areas, causing significant morbidity. However, our understanding of the true burden of scabies in Africa is limited, partly owing to limited capacity and challenges accessing the currently recommended diagnostic tools. The primary objective of this study was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of scabies assessments made by minimally trained field-workers. We trained field-workers with a minimum of secondary school education in the diagnosis of scabies. After the training, we assessed the diagnostic accuracy of assessments made by nine field-workers compared with the reference standard. In all, 193 individuals were assessed for scabies. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were calculated, as well as agreement (κ coefficients) between medical doctors and between field-workers. Of the 193 participants, 26% had scabies according to the reference standard. The sensitivity of field-worker diagnosis compared with the reference standard was 94% (95% CI: 90-99%), and the specificity was 96% (95% CI: 90-97%). The determination of severity by field-workers was less accurate; the sensitivity for severe scabies was 61% (95% CI: 48-74%), and the mean specificity was 97% (95% CI: 93-100%). This study demonstrated that field-workers without medical qualifications were capable of diagnosing scabies to a similar level of accuracy as experienced medical doctors after a short period of focal training. This may facilitate rapid assessments of scabies prevalence for public health purposes and decisions about mass drug administration implementation in similar settings.","PeriodicalId":520106,"journal":{"name":"The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Training of Field-Workers for Rapid Assessment of Scabies Prevalence: A Diagnostic Accuracy Study in Mozambique.\",\"authors\":\"Joanna Furnival-Adams,Valeria López,Hansel Mundaca,Amelia Houana,Antonio Macucha,Eldo Elobolobo,Aida Xerinda,Humberto Munguambe,Felisbela Materula,Regina Rabinovich,Francisco Saute,Daniel Engelman,Carlos Chaccour\",\"doi\":\"10.4269/ajtmh.24-0204\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Scabies is endemic in many resource-poor tropical areas, causing significant morbidity. However, our understanding of the true burden of scabies in Africa is limited, partly owing to limited capacity and challenges accessing the currently recommended diagnostic tools. The primary objective of this study was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of scabies assessments made by minimally trained field-workers. We trained field-workers with a minimum of secondary school education in the diagnosis of scabies. After the training, we assessed the diagnostic accuracy of assessments made by nine field-workers compared with the reference standard. In all, 193 individuals were assessed for scabies. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were calculated, as well as agreement (κ coefficients) between medical doctors and between field-workers. Of the 193 participants, 26% had scabies according to the reference standard. The sensitivity of field-worker diagnosis compared with the reference standard was 94% (95% CI: 90-99%), and the specificity was 96% (95% CI: 90-97%). The determination of severity by field-workers was less accurate; the sensitivity for severe scabies was 61% (95% CI: 48-74%), and the mean specificity was 97% (95% CI: 93-100%). This study demonstrated that field-workers without medical qualifications were capable of diagnosing scabies to a similar level of accuracy as experienced medical doctors after a short period of focal training. This may facilitate rapid assessments of scabies prevalence for public health purposes and decisions about mass drug administration implementation in similar settings.\",\"PeriodicalId\":520106,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.24-0204\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.24-0204","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

疥疮是许多资源匮乏的热带地区的地方病,造成了严重的发病率。然而,我们对疥疮在非洲造成的真正负担的了解还很有限,部分原因是能力有限,以及在获取目前推荐的诊断工具方面存在挑战。本研究的主要目的是评估由受过最少培训的现场工作人员对疥疮进行评估的诊断准确性。我们对至少受过中学教育的现场工作人员进行了疥疮诊断培训。培训结束后,我们对 9 名现场工作人员的诊断准确性进行了评估,并与参考标准进行了比较。总共对 193 人进行了疥疮评估。我们计算了灵敏度、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值,以及医生之间和现场工作人员之间的一致性(κ系数)。根据参考标准,193 名参与者中有 26% 患有疥疮。与参考标准相比,现场工作人员诊断的灵敏度为 94%(95% CI:90-99%),特异度为 96%(95% CI:90-97%)。现场工作人员对疥疮严重程度的判定准确性较低;对严重疥疮的敏感性为 61%(95% CI:48-74%),平均特异性为 97%(95% CI:93-100%)。这项研究表明,没有医疗资质的野外工作者在经过短期集中培训后,诊断疥疮的准确性与经验丰富的医生相差无几。这有助于出于公共卫生目的快速评估疥疮流行情况,并为在类似环境中实施大规模用药做出决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Training of Field-Workers for Rapid Assessment of Scabies Prevalence: A Diagnostic Accuracy Study in Mozambique.
Scabies is endemic in many resource-poor tropical areas, causing significant morbidity. However, our understanding of the true burden of scabies in Africa is limited, partly owing to limited capacity and challenges accessing the currently recommended diagnostic tools. The primary objective of this study was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of scabies assessments made by minimally trained field-workers. We trained field-workers with a minimum of secondary school education in the diagnosis of scabies. After the training, we assessed the diagnostic accuracy of assessments made by nine field-workers compared with the reference standard. In all, 193 individuals were assessed for scabies. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were calculated, as well as agreement (κ coefficients) between medical doctors and between field-workers. Of the 193 participants, 26% had scabies according to the reference standard. The sensitivity of field-worker diagnosis compared with the reference standard was 94% (95% CI: 90-99%), and the specificity was 96% (95% CI: 90-97%). The determination of severity by field-workers was less accurate; the sensitivity for severe scabies was 61% (95% CI: 48-74%), and the mean specificity was 97% (95% CI: 93-100%). This study demonstrated that field-workers without medical qualifications were capable of diagnosing scabies to a similar level of accuracy as experienced medical doctors after a short period of focal training. This may facilitate rapid assessments of scabies prevalence for public health purposes and decisions about mass drug administration implementation in similar settings.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Case Report: A Case of Sporotrichoid Cutaneous Leishmaniasis Caused by Leishmania (Viannia) peruviana. Changes in Access to Alcohol-Based Hand Rub and Hand Hygiene Adherence among Healthcare Workers after a Hand Rub Production and Distribution Program in Rural Uganda before and during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Training of Field-Workers for Rapid Assessment of Scabies Prevalence: A Diagnostic Accuracy Study in Mozambique. Antimicrobial Resistance in Bacterial Species Causing Orthopaedic Surgical Site Infections at a National Trauma Center, Kathmandu, Nepal. Paradoxical Reaction to Tuberculosis Therapy among HIV-Negative Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1