制定抗菌药物管理计划,使门诊患者在治疗急性非复杂性膀胱炎时避免使用口服氟喹诺酮类药物

Tomoyuki Kato, Masayuki Nagasawa, Ippei Tanaka, Yuka Seyama, Reiko Sekikawa, Shiori Yamada, Eriko Ishikawa, Kento Kitajima
{"title":"制定抗菌药物管理计划,使门诊患者在治疗急性非复杂性膀胱炎时避免使用口服氟喹诺酮类药物","authors":"Tomoyuki Kato, Masayuki Nagasawa, Ippei Tanaka, Yuka Seyama, Reiko Sekikawa, Shiori Yamada, Eriko Ishikawa, Kento Kitajima","doi":"10.3390/antibiotics13090886","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The increase in fluoroquinolone (FQ)-resistant Escherichia coli (EC) is a serious global problem. In addition, much of acute uncomplicated cystitis (AUC) cases are caused by EC. FQs have been selected for the treatment of cystitis in outpatients, and there is concern about treatment failure. It is therefore necessary to select appropriate antimicrobials to spare FQs. However, there are few reported effective antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) for outpatients. We aimed to establish the effective ASP for outpatients diagnosed with AUC caused by EC, to spare the use of FQs, and to explore optimal oral antimicrobials for AUC. The study subjects were outpatients treated for AUC caused by extended-spectrum β-lactamase-non-producing EC (non-ESBL-EC). Based on the antibiogram results, we recommended cefaclor (CCL) as the initial treatment for AUC, and educated clinical pharmacists who also worked together to advocate for CCL or cephalexin (CEX) prescriptions. FQ usages decreased, and cephalosporin (Ceph) prescriptions increased in all medical departments. The Ceph group (n = 114; CCL = 60, CEX = 54) in the non-FQ group had fewer treatment failures than the FQ group (n = 86) (12.3% vs. 31.4%). Cephs, including CCL and CEX, were effective treatments for AUC caused by non-ESBL-EC. Antimicrobial selection based on antibiogram results and the practice of an ASP in collaboration with clinical pharmacists were useful for optimizing antimicrobial therapy in outpatients.","PeriodicalId":8151,"journal":{"name":"Antibiotics","volume":"89 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Establishment of an Antimicrobial Stewardship Program to Spare the Use of Oral Fluoroquinolones for Acute Uncomplicated Cystitis in Outpatients\",\"authors\":\"Tomoyuki Kato, Masayuki Nagasawa, Ippei Tanaka, Yuka Seyama, Reiko Sekikawa, Shiori Yamada, Eriko Ishikawa, Kento Kitajima\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/antibiotics13090886\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The increase in fluoroquinolone (FQ)-resistant Escherichia coli (EC) is a serious global problem. In addition, much of acute uncomplicated cystitis (AUC) cases are caused by EC. FQs have been selected for the treatment of cystitis in outpatients, and there is concern about treatment failure. It is therefore necessary to select appropriate antimicrobials to spare FQs. However, there are few reported effective antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) for outpatients. We aimed to establish the effective ASP for outpatients diagnosed with AUC caused by EC, to spare the use of FQs, and to explore optimal oral antimicrobials for AUC. The study subjects were outpatients treated for AUC caused by extended-spectrum β-lactamase-non-producing EC (non-ESBL-EC). Based on the antibiogram results, we recommended cefaclor (CCL) as the initial treatment for AUC, and educated clinical pharmacists who also worked together to advocate for CCL or cephalexin (CEX) prescriptions. FQ usages decreased, and cephalosporin (Ceph) prescriptions increased in all medical departments. The Ceph group (n = 114; CCL = 60, CEX = 54) in the non-FQ group had fewer treatment failures than the FQ group (n = 86) (12.3% vs. 31.4%). Cephs, including CCL and CEX, were effective treatments for AUC caused by non-ESBL-EC. Antimicrobial selection based on antibiogram results and the practice of an ASP in collaboration with clinical pharmacists were useful for optimizing antimicrobial therapy in outpatients.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8151,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Antibiotics\",\"volume\":\"89 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Antibiotics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics13090886\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antibiotics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics13090886","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

耐氟喹诺酮(FQ)大肠埃希菌(EC)的增加是一个严重的全球性问题。此外,大部分急性无并发症膀胱炎(AUC)病例都是由 EC 引起的。门诊病人的膀胱炎治疗一直选用 FQs,但治疗失败的问题令人担忧。因此,有必要选择适当的抗菌药物来替代 FQs。然而,针对门诊患者的有效抗菌药物管理计划(ASP)鲜有报道。我们旨在为门诊患者建立有效的抗菌药物管理计划,以避免使用 FQs,并探索治疗 AUC 的最佳口服抗菌药物。研究对象是因扩展谱β-内酰胺酶不产生EC(非ESBL-EC)引起的AUC而接受治疗的门诊患者。根据抗生素图谱结果,我们建议将头孢克洛(CCL)作为 AUC 的初始治疗药物,并对临床药剂师进行了教育,他们还共同倡导开具 CCL 或头孢氨苄(CEX)处方。在所有医疗部门中,FQ 的使用量减少了,而头孢菌素 (Ceph) 的处方量增加了。非 FQ 组中头孢菌素组(n = 114;CCL = 60,CEX = 54)的治疗失败率(12.3% 对 31.4%)低于 FQ 组(n = 86)。Cephs(包括CCL和CEX)是治疗非ESBL-EC引起的AUC的有效药物。根据抗生素图谱结果选择抗菌药物,以及与临床药剂师合作实施ASP,有助于优化门诊患者的抗菌治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Establishment of an Antimicrobial Stewardship Program to Spare the Use of Oral Fluoroquinolones for Acute Uncomplicated Cystitis in Outpatients
The increase in fluoroquinolone (FQ)-resistant Escherichia coli (EC) is a serious global problem. In addition, much of acute uncomplicated cystitis (AUC) cases are caused by EC. FQs have been selected for the treatment of cystitis in outpatients, and there is concern about treatment failure. It is therefore necessary to select appropriate antimicrobials to spare FQs. However, there are few reported effective antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) for outpatients. We aimed to establish the effective ASP for outpatients diagnosed with AUC caused by EC, to spare the use of FQs, and to explore optimal oral antimicrobials for AUC. The study subjects were outpatients treated for AUC caused by extended-spectrum β-lactamase-non-producing EC (non-ESBL-EC). Based on the antibiogram results, we recommended cefaclor (CCL) as the initial treatment for AUC, and educated clinical pharmacists who also worked together to advocate for CCL or cephalexin (CEX) prescriptions. FQ usages decreased, and cephalosporin (Ceph) prescriptions increased in all medical departments. The Ceph group (n = 114; CCL = 60, CEX = 54) in the non-FQ group had fewer treatment failures than the FQ group (n = 86) (12.3% vs. 31.4%). Cephs, including CCL and CEX, were effective treatments for AUC caused by non-ESBL-EC. Antimicrobial selection based on antibiogram results and the practice of an ASP in collaboration with clinical pharmacists were useful for optimizing antimicrobial therapy in outpatients.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
ST105 Lineage of MRSA: An Emerging Implication for Bloodstream Infection in the American and European Continents Appropriate Use of Antibiotics in Acute Pancreatitis: A Scoping Review Nail Lacquer Containing Origanum vulgare and Rosmarinus officinalis Essential Oils and Biogenic Silver Nanoparticles for Onychomycosis: Development, Characterization, and Evaluation of Antifungal Efficacy Recurrent Cystitis in Women—A Real-World Analysis of Bacteria Spectrum and Resistance Situation for Calculated Therapy Acute Diarrhea in a Tertiary Emergency Department: From Readmission Determinants to Antibiotic Prescription
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1