Sang Hyub Lee,Dong-Hwan Kim,Jin Hoon Park,Dong-Geun Lee,Choon Keun Park,Dong Ho Kang
{"title":"至少随访 2 年的退行性椎管狭窄症腰骶部融合术后骶骨骨折的发生率和风险因素:病例对照研究。","authors":"Sang Hyub Lee,Dong-Hwan Kim,Jin Hoon Park,Dong-Geun Lee,Choon Keun Park,Dong Ho Kang","doi":"10.1016/j.wneu.2024.09.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nThis study aimed to investigate the incidence and risk factors for sacral fractures following lumbosacral fusion.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nWe conducted a retrospective review of patients who underwent lumbosacral fusion for degenerative spinal stenosis with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Patients who developed and those who did not develop a sacral fracture were categorized into the \"sacral fracture\" and \"non-fracture\" groups. The demographic and radiological data were compared between the two groups.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nA total of 65 patients were included in this study. Among them, seven patients were categorized into the sacral fracture and 58 patients into the non-fracture groups, respectively. The incidence of sacral fracture was 10.8%. In the sacral fracture group, age and fusion levels were significantly higher (P < 0.05), while bone mineral density (BMD) T-score was significantly lower (P < 0.05) than non-fracture group. PI, preoperative PT, postoperative SS, and postoperative LL were significantly higher (P < 0.05) in the sacral fracture than the non-fracture group. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that BMD T-score (Odds ratio [OR] 0.25, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.08-0.79, P = 0.019), postoperative SS (OR 1.14, 95% CI 1.00-1.29, P = 0.047), and changes in L4-S1 lordosis (OR 1.11, 95% CI 1.00-1.23, P = 0.049) were significant factors.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nThe overall incidence of sacral fracture was 10.8%. In our study, advanced age, low BMD, long fusion levels, and preoperative compensatory pelvic retroversion and excessive correction of it were risk factors for sacral fractures.","PeriodicalId":23906,"journal":{"name":"World neurosurgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Incidence and Risk Factors of Sacral Fracture following Lumbosacral Fusion for Degenerative Spinal Stenosis with a Minimum Follow-up of 2 years: A Case-Control Study.\",\"authors\":\"Sang Hyub Lee,Dong-Hwan Kim,Jin Hoon Park,Dong-Geun Lee,Choon Keun Park,Dong Ho Kang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.wneu.2024.09.014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND\\r\\nThis study aimed to investigate the incidence and risk factors for sacral fractures following lumbosacral fusion.\\r\\n\\r\\nMETHODS\\r\\nWe conducted a retrospective review of patients who underwent lumbosacral fusion for degenerative spinal stenosis with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Patients who developed and those who did not develop a sacral fracture were categorized into the \\\"sacral fracture\\\" and \\\"non-fracture\\\" groups. The demographic and radiological data were compared between the two groups.\\r\\n\\r\\nRESULTS\\r\\nA total of 65 patients were included in this study. Among them, seven patients were categorized into the sacral fracture and 58 patients into the non-fracture groups, respectively. The incidence of sacral fracture was 10.8%. In the sacral fracture group, age and fusion levels were significantly higher (P < 0.05), while bone mineral density (BMD) T-score was significantly lower (P < 0.05) than non-fracture group. PI, preoperative PT, postoperative SS, and postoperative LL were significantly higher (P < 0.05) in the sacral fracture than the non-fracture group. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that BMD T-score (Odds ratio [OR] 0.25, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.08-0.79, P = 0.019), postoperative SS (OR 1.14, 95% CI 1.00-1.29, P = 0.047), and changes in L4-S1 lordosis (OR 1.11, 95% CI 1.00-1.23, P = 0.049) were significant factors.\\r\\n\\r\\nCONCLUSIONS\\r\\nThe overall incidence of sacral fracture was 10.8%. In our study, advanced age, low BMD, long fusion levels, and preoperative compensatory pelvic retroversion and excessive correction of it were risk factors for sacral fractures.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23906,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World neurosurgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World neurosurgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2024.09.014\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2024.09.014","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景本研究旨在调查腰骶部融合术后骶骨骨折的发生率和风险因素。方法我们对因退行性椎管狭窄而接受腰骶部融合术的患者进行了回顾性研究,随访至少 2 年。将出现和未出现骶骨骨折的患者分为 "骶骨骨折 "组和 "非骨折 "组。结果本研究共纳入 65 例患者。其中,7 名患者被分为骶骨骨折组,58 名患者被分为非骨折组。骶骨骨折的发生率为 10.8%。在骶骨骨折组中,年龄和融合程度明显高于非骨折组(P < 0.05),而骨矿密度(BMD)T-score则明显低于非骨折组(P < 0.05)。骶骨骨折组的 PI、术前 PT、术后 SS 和术后 LL 均明显高于非骨折组(P < 0.05)。多变量逻辑回归分析显示,BMD T 评分(Odds ratio [OR] 0.25,95% 置信区间 [CI] 0.08-0.79,P = 0.019)、术后 SS(OR 1.14,95% CI 1.结论骶骨骨折的总发生率为 10.8%。在我们的研究中,高龄、低 BMD、长融合水平、术前代偿性骨盆后倾和过度矫正骨盆后倾是骶骨骨折的危险因素。
Incidence and Risk Factors of Sacral Fracture following Lumbosacral Fusion for Degenerative Spinal Stenosis with a Minimum Follow-up of 2 years: A Case-Control Study.
BACKGROUND
This study aimed to investigate the incidence and risk factors for sacral fractures following lumbosacral fusion.
METHODS
We conducted a retrospective review of patients who underwent lumbosacral fusion for degenerative spinal stenosis with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Patients who developed and those who did not develop a sacral fracture were categorized into the "sacral fracture" and "non-fracture" groups. The demographic and radiological data were compared between the two groups.
RESULTS
A total of 65 patients were included in this study. Among them, seven patients were categorized into the sacral fracture and 58 patients into the non-fracture groups, respectively. The incidence of sacral fracture was 10.8%. In the sacral fracture group, age and fusion levels were significantly higher (P < 0.05), while bone mineral density (BMD) T-score was significantly lower (P < 0.05) than non-fracture group. PI, preoperative PT, postoperative SS, and postoperative LL were significantly higher (P < 0.05) in the sacral fracture than the non-fracture group. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that BMD T-score (Odds ratio [OR] 0.25, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.08-0.79, P = 0.019), postoperative SS (OR 1.14, 95% CI 1.00-1.29, P = 0.047), and changes in L4-S1 lordosis (OR 1.11, 95% CI 1.00-1.23, P = 0.049) were significant factors.
CONCLUSIONS
The overall incidence of sacral fracture was 10.8%. In our study, advanced age, low BMD, long fusion levels, and preoperative compensatory pelvic retroversion and excessive correction of it were risk factors for sacral fractures.
期刊介绍:
World Neurosurgery has an open access mirror journal World Neurosurgery: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review.
The journal''s mission is to:
-To provide a first-class international forum and a 2-way conduit for dialogue that is relevant to neurosurgeons and providers who care for neurosurgery patients. The categories of the exchanged information include clinical and basic science, as well as global information that provide social, political, educational, economic, cultural or societal insights and knowledge that are of significance and relevance to worldwide neurosurgery patient care.
-To act as a primary intellectual catalyst for the stimulation of creativity, the creation of new knowledge, and the enhancement of quality neurosurgical care worldwide.
-To provide a forum for communication that enriches the lives of all neurosurgeons and their colleagues; and, in so doing, enriches the lives of their patients.
Topics to be addressed in World Neurosurgery include: EDUCATION, ECONOMICS, RESEARCH, POLITICS, HISTORY, CULTURE, CLINICAL SCIENCE, LABORATORY SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, OPERATIVE TECHNIQUES, CLINICAL IMAGES, VIDEOS