体位感应诱发电位与经颅多普勒超声在颈动脉内膜切除术中脑缺血检测中的对比分析:来自网络 Meta 分析和临床数据的启示。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY World neurosurgery Pub Date : 2024-09-10 DOI:10.1016/j.wneu.2024.09.023
Dejing Cheng,Siyuan Yang,Chengyuan Ji
{"title":"体位感应诱发电位与经颅多普勒超声在颈动脉内膜切除术中脑缺血检测中的对比分析:来自网络 Meta 分析和临床数据的启示。","authors":"Dejing Cheng,Siyuan Yang,Chengyuan Ji","doi":"10.1016/j.wneu.2024.09.023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\r\nThis study aims to compare the diagnostic efficacy of somatosensory-evoked potentials (SEP) and transcranial Doppler sonography (TCD) for monitoring cerebral tissue ischemia during carotid endarterectomy (CEA) using network meta-analysis and retrospective analysis of clinical data.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nFor the meta-analysis, we conducted a comprehensive search of four electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, and Web of Science) from inception to September 2023, resulting in the inclusion of 52 relevant articles. Additionally, a retrospective study was conducted at our hospital, involving patients who underwent CEA surgery from July 2019 to July 2021.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nThe network meta-analysis incorporated 52 articles, with ranking results indicating that SEP demonstrated superior performance in specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy , with surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) values of 99.9%, 93.8%, 96.6%, and 99.9%, respectively. Furthermore, TCD exhibited the highest sensitivity with a SUCRA value of 92.0%. A total of 190 patients meeting inclusion criteria were included in the retrospective study. The area under the curve (AUC) for SEP's receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was 0.787, compared to TCD's AUC of 0.606. SEP demonstrated a sensitivity of 66.67%, with a specificity of 90.76%, PPV of 19.05%, NPV of 98.82%, and accuracy of 90%. For TCD, the diagnostic performance measures included a sensitivity of 50.00%, specificity of 71.19%, PPV of 5.35%, NPV of 97.76%, and accuracy of 70.53%. The Fisher's exact test for sensitivity yielded a result of P=1.000. The χˆ2 test for specificity resulted in χˆ2=22.863, with P<0.001. Continuous correction χˆ2 tests for PPV and NPV showed χˆ2=2.005 (P=0.157) and χˆ2=0.069 (P=0.793), respectively. Additionally, the χˆ2 test for accuracy showed χˆ2=22.742, with P<0.001.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nDuring CEA, SEP appears to provide a slightly more reliable indication of the ischemic condition in cerebral tissues compared to TCD.","PeriodicalId":23906,"journal":{"name":"World neurosurgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Analysis of Somatosensory-evoked Potentials and Transcranial Doppler Ultrasound for Cerebral Ischemia Detection in Carotid Endarterectomy: Insights from Network Meta-Analysis and Clinical Data.\",\"authors\":\"Dejing Cheng,Siyuan Yang,Chengyuan Ji\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.wneu.2024.09.023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"OBJECTIVE\\r\\nThis study aims to compare the diagnostic efficacy of somatosensory-evoked potentials (SEP) and transcranial Doppler sonography (TCD) for monitoring cerebral tissue ischemia during carotid endarterectomy (CEA) using network meta-analysis and retrospective analysis of clinical data.\\r\\n\\r\\nMETHODS\\r\\nFor the meta-analysis, we conducted a comprehensive search of four electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, and Web of Science) from inception to September 2023, resulting in the inclusion of 52 relevant articles. Additionally, a retrospective study was conducted at our hospital, involving patients who underwent CEA surgery from July 2019 to July 2021.\\r\\n\\r\\nRESULTS\\r\\nThe network meta-analysis incorporated 52 articles, with ranking results indicating that SEP demonstrated superior performance in specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy , with surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) values of 99.9%, 93.8%, 96.6%, and 99.9%, respectively. Furthermore, TCD exhibited the highest sensitivity with a SUCRA value of 92.0%. A total of 190 patients meeting inclusion criteria were included in the retrospective study. The area under the curve (AUC) for SEP's receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was 0.787, compared to TCD's AUC of 0.606. SEP demonstrated a sensitivity of 66.67%, with a specificity of 90.76%, PPV of 19.05%, NPV of 98.82%, and accuracy of 90%. For TCD, the diagnostic performance measures included a sensitivity of 50.00%, specificity of 71.19%, PPV of 5.35%, NPV of 97.76%, and accuracy of 70.53%. The Fisher's exact test for sensitivity yielded a result of P=1.000. The χˆ2 test for specificity resulted in χˆ2=22.863, with P<0.001. Continuous correction χˆ2 tests for PPV and NPV showed χˆ2=2.005 (P=0.157) and χˆ2=0.069 (P=0.793), respectively. Additionally, the χˆ2 test for accuracy showed χˆ2=22.742, with P<0.001.\\r\\n\\r\\nCONCLUSIONS\\r\\nDuring CEA, SEP appears to provide a slightly more reliable indication of the ischemic condition in cerebral tissues compared to TCD.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23906,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World neurosurgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World neurosurgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2024.09.023\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2024.09.023","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的本研究旨在通过网络荟萃分析和临床数据回顾性分析,比较体感诱发电位(SEP)和经颅多普勒超声(TCD)在颈动脉内膜剥脱术(CEA)期间监测脑组织缺血的诊断效果。方法为了进行荟萃分析,我们对从开始到 2023 年 9 月的四个电子数据库(PubMed、EMBASE、Cochrane 和 Web of Science)进行了全面检索,结果纳入了 52 篇相关文章。结果网络荟萃分析纳入了52篇文章,排序结果显示,SEP在特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)、阴性预测值(NPV)和准确性方面表现优异,累积排序曲线下表面值(SUCRA)分别为99.9%、93.8%、96.6%和99.9%。此外,TCD 的灵敏度最高,SUCRA 值为 92.0%。这项回顾性研究共纳入了 190 名符合纳入标准的患者。SEP 的接收器操作特征(ROC)曲线下面积(AUC)为 0.787,而 TCD 的 AUC 为 0.606。SEP 的灵敏度为 66.67%,特异度为 90.76%,PPV 为 19.05%,NPV 为 98.82%,准确度为 90%。TCD 的诊断性能指标包括灵敏度 50.00%、特异性 71.19%、PPV 5.35%、NPV 97.76%、准确性 70.53%。灵敏度的费雪精确检验结果为 P=1.000。特异性的χˆ2检验结果为χˆ2=22.863,P<0.001。PPV和NPV的连续校正χˆ2检验结果分别为χˆ2=2.005(P=0.157)和χˆ2=0.069(P=0.793)。此外,准确性的χˆ2检验显示χˆ2=22.742,P<0.001。结论在CEA期间,与TCD相比,SEP似乎能提供略微更可靠的脑组织缺血状况指示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparative Analysis of Somatosensory-evoked Potentials and Transcranial Doppler Ultrasound for Cerebral Ischemia Detection in Carotid Endarterectomy: Insights from Network Meta-Analysis and Clinical Data.
OBJECTIVE This study aims to compare the diagnostic efficacy of somatosensory-evoked potentials (SEP) and transcranial Doppler sonography (TCD) for monitoring cerebral tissue ischemia during carotid endarterectomy (CEA) using network meta-analysis and retrospective analysis of clinical data. METHODS For the meta-analysis, we conducted a comprehensive search of four electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, and Web of Science) from inception to September 2023, resulting in the inclusion of 52 relevant articles. Additionally, a retrospective study was conducted at our hospital, involving patients who underwent CEA surgery from July 2019 to July 2021. RESULTS The network meta-analysis incorporated 52 articles, with ranking results indicating that SEP demonstrated superior performance in specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy , with surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) values of 99.9%, 93.8%, 96.6%, and 99.9%, respectively. Furthermore, TCD exhibited the highest sensitivity with a SUCRA value of 92.0%. A total of 190 patients meeting inclusion criteria were included in the retrospective study. The area under the curve (AUC) for SEP's receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was 0.787, compared to TCD's AUC of 0.606. SEP demonstrated a sensitivity of 66.67%, with a specificity of 90.76%, PPV of 19.05%, NPV of 98.82%, and accuracy of 90%. For TCD, the diagnostic performance measures included a sensitivity of 50.00%, specificity of 71.19%, PPV of 5.35%, NPV of 97.76%, and accuracy of 70.53%. The Fisher's exact test for sensitivity yielded a result of P=1.000. The χˆ2 test for specificity resulted in χˆ2=22.863, with P<0.001. Continuous correction χˆ2 tests for PPV and NPV showed χˆ2=2.005 (P=0.157) and χˆ2=0.069 (P=0.793), respectively. Additionally, the χˆ2 test for accuracy showed χˆ2=22.742, with P<0.001. CONCLUSIONS During CEA, SEP appears to provide a slightly more reliable indication of the ischemic condition in cerebral tissues compared to TCD.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
World neurosurgery
World neurosurgery CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-SURGERY
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
15.00%
发文量
1765
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: World Neurosurgery has an open access mirror journal World Neurosurgery: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review. The journal''s mission is to: -To provide a first-class international forum and a 2-way conduit for dialogue that is relevant to neurosurgeons and providers who care for neurosurgery patients. The categories of the exchanged information include clinical and basic science, as well as global information that provide social, political, educational, economic, cultural or societal insights and knowledge that are of significance and relevance to worldwide neurosurgery patient care. -To act as a primary intellectual catalyst for the stimulation of creativity, the creation of new knowledge, and the enhancement of quality neurosurgical care worldwide. -To provide a forum for communication that enriches the lives of all neurosurgeons and their colleagues; and, in so doing, enriches the lives of their patients. Topics to be addressed in World Neurosurgery include: EDUCATION, ECONOMICS, RESEARCH, POLITICS, HISTORY, CULTURE, CLINICAL SCIENCE, LABORATORY SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, OPERATIVE TECHNIQUES, CLINICAL IMAGES, VIDEOS
期刊最新文献
Artificial Intelligence for Prediction of Shunt Response in Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus: A Systematic Review. Plasma estrogen levels and aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage in women. Postural Change Assists Surgical Maneuverability During Endoscopic Transsphenoidal Surgery for Pituitary Macroadenoma. YouTube® as a Tool for Medical Education: Analyzing Content Quality and Reliability on Chiari Malformation. Evaluation of the efficacy of unilateral biportal endoscopic lamina osteotomy replantation assisted by ultrasonic bone scalpel in the treatment of lumbar infectious spondylitis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1