木质和粪便制成的生物秸秆可减少抗生素残留并改变粪便施用草料-土壤系统中的抗生素耐药基因和微生物群落

Agronomy Pub Date : 2024-09-15 DOI:10.3390/agronomy14092100
Gyucheol Choi, Jeff A. Brady, Olabiyi Obayomi, Emily Green, Caroly Leija, Kristin Sefcik, Daisy Gonzalez, Cosette B. Taggart, James P. Muir, Eunsung Kan
{"title":"木质和粪便制成的生物秸秆可减少抗生素残留并改变粪便施用草料-土壤系统中的抗生素耐药基因和微生物群落","authors":"Gyucheol Choi, Jeff A. Brady, Olabiyi Obayomi, Emily Green, Caroly Leija, Kristin Sefcik, Daisy Gonzalez, Cosette B. Taggart, James P. Muir, Eunsung Kan","doi":"10.3390/agronomy14092100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The increasing use of antibiotics in livestock poses environmental risks, leading to contamination of agricultural soils and propagation of microbial antibiotic-resistant genes (ARGs). This study examined the impacts of wood- and manure-derived biochar (BC) on antibiotic residues, ARGs, and microbial communities in sandy loam and clay loam soils amended with manure in Cynodon dactylon pastures. We hypothesized that BC amendments would influence the degradation of antibiotics and the structure of microbial communities based on their physicochemical properties and soil types. Our results demonstrated that wood BC reduced the concentrations of tetracycline and sulfonamides, particularly in sandy loam soil, due to its larger surface area and hydrophobic properties. In contrast, manure BC provided additional nutrients and supported atmospheric nitrogen-fixing microbial groups, especially in clay loam soil, while exhibiting variable efficiency in reducing antibiotic residues due to its lower surface area and higher ash content. These findings underscore the differential impacts of each BC type, emphasizing the need for tailored BC applications based on soil type to effectively mitigate antibiotic contamination and promote sustainable agricultural practices. In conclusion, wood BC was more effective in enhancing soil health by reducing antibiotic residues and improving microbial diversity, particularly in sandy loam soils, while manure BC was beneficial for nutrient cycling in clay loam soils.","PeriodicalId":7601,"journal":{"name":"Agronomy","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Wood- and Manure-Derived Biochars Reduce Antibiotic Residues and Shift Antibiotic Resistance Genes and Microbial Communities in Manure Applied Forage–Soil Systems\",\"authors\":\"Gyucheol Choi, Jeff A. Brady, Olabiyi Obayomi, Emily Green, Caroly Leija, Kristin Sefcik, Daisy Gonzalez, Cosette B. Taggart, James P. Muir, Eunsung Kan\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/agronomy14092100\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The increasing use of antibiotics in livestock poses environmental risks, leading to contamination of agricultural soils and propagation of microbial antibiotic-resistant genes (ARGs). This study examined the impacts of wood- and manure-derived biochar (BC) on antibiotic residues, ARGs, and microbial communities in sandy loam and clay loam soils amended with manure in Cynodon dactylon pastures. We hypothesized that BC amendments would influence the degradation of antibiotics and the structure of microbial communities based on their physicochemical properties and soil types. Our results demonstrated that wood BC reduced the concentrations of tetracycline and sulfonamides, particularly in sandy loam soil, due to its larger surface area and hydrophobic properties. In contrast, manure BC provided additional nutrients and supported atmospheric nitrogen-fixing microbial groups, especially in clay loam soil, while exhibiting variable efficiency in reducing antibiotic residues due to its lower surface area and higher ash content. These findings underscore the differential impacts of each BC type, emphasizing the need for tailored BC applications based on soil type to effectively mitigate antibiotic contamination and promote sustainable agricultural practices. In conclusion, wood BC was more effective in enhancing soil health by reducing antibiotic residues and improving microbial diversity, particularly in sandy loam soils, while manure BC was beneficial for nutrient cycling in clay loam soils.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7601,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agronomy\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agronomy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14092100\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agronomy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14092100","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

畜牧业中抗生素使用量的增加带来了环境风险,导致农业土壤污染和微生物抗生素耐药基因(ARGs)的传播。本研究考察了木材和粪便衍生的生物炭(BC)对沙壤土和粘壤土中抗生素残留、ARGs 和微生物群落的影响。我们假设,根据抗生素的理化性质和土壤类型,BC 添加剂会影响抗生素的降解和微生物群落的结构。我们的研究结果表明,木材萃取物因其较大的表面积和疏水特性,降低了四环素和磺胺类药物的浓度,尤其是在砂壤土中。相比之下,粪便萃取物提供了额外的养分并支持大气固氮微生物群,尤其是在粘壤土中,同时由于其表面积较小和灰分含量较高,在减少抗生素残留方面表现出不同的效率。这些发现强调了每种萃取物类型的不同影响,强调需要根据土壤类型量身定制萃取物的应用,以有效减轻抗生素污染并促进可持续农业实践。总之,木质萃取物在通过减少抗生素残留和改善微生物多样性来提高土壤健康方面更为有效,尤其是在砂壤土中,而粪便萃取物则有利于粘壤土中的养分循环。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Wood- and Manure-Derived Biochars Reduce Antibiotic Residues and Shift Antibiotic Resistance Genes and Microbial Communities in Manure Applied Forage–Soil Systems
The increasing use of antibiotics in livestock poses environmental risks, leading to contamination of agricultural soils and propagation of microbial antibiotic-resistant genes (ARGs). This study examined the impacts of wood- and manure-derived biochar (BC) on antibiotic residues, ARGs, and microbial communities in sandy loam and clay loam soils amended with manure in Cynodon dactylon pastures. We hypothesized that BC amendments would influence the degradation of antibiotics and the structure of microbial communities based on their physicochemical properties and soil types. Our results demonstrated that wood BC reduced the concentrations of tetracycline and sulfonamides, particularly in sandy loam soil, due to its larger surface area and hydrophobic properties. In contrast, manure BC provided additional nutrients and supported atmospheric nitrogen-fixing microbial groups, especially in clay loam soil, while exhibiting variable efficiency in reducing antibiotic residues due to its lower surface area and higher ash content. These findings underscore the differential impacts of each BC type, emphasizing the need for tailored BC applications based on soil type to effectively mitigate antibiotic contamination and promote sustainable agricultural practices. In conclusion, wood BC was more effective in enhancing soil health by reducing antibiotic residues and improving microbial diversity, particularly in sandy loam soils, while manure BC was beneficial for nutrient cycling in clay loam soils.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Influence of Sowing Date on the Primary Yield Components of Maize Algorithm for Locating Apical Meristematic Tissue of Weeds Based on YOLO Instance Segmentation Unlocking Cassava Brown Streak Disease Resistance in Cassava: Insights from Genetic Variability and Combining Ability Effects of Spray Adjuvants on Droplet Deposition Characteristics in Litchi Trees under UAV Spraying Operations Synthesis, Herbicidal Activity, and Molecular Mode of Action Evaluation of Novel Quinazolinone—Phenoxypropionate Hybrids Containing a Diester Moiety
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1