Abdelhak Ouldyerou , Egon Mamboleo , Lauren Gilchrist , Khaled Alsharif , Peter Ngan , Ali Merdji , Osama Mukdadi
{"title":"针对不同骨骼成熟阶段患者的正畸微型螺钉辅助快速腭部扩张器的硅内评估。","authors":"Abdelhak Ouldyerou , Egon Mamboleo , Lauren Gilchrist , Khaled Alsharif , Peter Ngan , Ali Merdji , Osama Mukdadi","doi":"10.1016/j.ajodo.2024.07.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>This study aimed to use a finite element method to assess the stress on the miniscrews, skeletal and dental changes resulting from maxillary expansion using either a tooth-bone-borne (TBB) or a bone-borne (BB) device on patients with various skeletal maturation.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Two types of expanders were modeled using SolidWorks. The design of the 2 expanders was similar, with the exception that the BB appliance lacked support for teeth (rods and bands). Both were placed on the palatal bones with the help of 4 miniscrews as bony anchorage. Five skeletal maturation stages were examined using suture maturation classification by Angelieri. A lateral displacement of 0.2 mm was applied to simulate 1 turn of jackscrew per day. The dental and skeletal changes from the treatment were quantified.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Stage A sutural maturation exhibited the greatest skeletal movement (0.13 mm/d) with a V-shaped displacement pattern. Stages B and C exhibited a more parallel expansion pattern. Stages D and E exhibited the least amount of skeletal movement with either device. Compared with the BB device, TBB demonstrated greater dental displacement. On average, the BB device exhibited a skeletal-to-dental expansion ratio of 70% from stage A to C compared with 49% with the TBB device.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>BB device showed more skeletal displacement than TBB, and the latter showed more dental side effects, particularly during stages B and C. The miniscrew-assisted rapid palatal expansion appliance was effective with sutural maturation stages A to C using the classification by Angelieri with a more parallel separation of the midpalatal sutures in stages B and C.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50806,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics","volume":"166 6","pages":"Pages 561-571"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In-silico evaluation of orthodontic miniscrew-assisted rapid palatal expanders for patients with various stages of skeletal maturation\",\"authors\":\"Abdelhak Ouldyerou , Egon Mamboleo , Lauren Gilchrist , Khaled Alsharif , Peter Ngan , Ali Merdji , Osama Mukdadi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ajodo.2024.07.018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>This study aimed to use a finite element method to assess the stress on the miniscrews, skeletal and dental changes resulting from maxillary expansion using either a tooth-bone-borne (TBB) or a bone-borne (BB) device on patients with various skeletal maturation.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Two types of expanders were modeled using SolidWorks. The design of the 2 expanders was similar, with the exception that the BB appliance lacked support for teeth (rods and bands). Both were placed on the palatal bones with the help of 4 miniscrews as bony anchorage. Five skeletal maturation stages were examined using suture maturation classification by Angelieri. A lateral displacement of 0.2 mm was applied to simulate 1 turn of jackscrew per day. The dental and skeletal changes from the treatment were quantified.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Stage A sutural maturation exhibited the greatest skeletal movement (0.13 mm/d) with a V-shaped displacement pattern. Stages B and C exhibited a more parallel expansion pattern. Stages D and E exhibited the least amount of skeletal movement with either device. Compared with the BB device, TBB demonstrated greater dental displacement. On average, the BB device exhibited a skeletal-to-dental expansion ratio of 70% from stage A to C compared with 49% with the TBB device.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>BB device showed more skeletal displacement than TBB, and the latter showed more dental side effects, particularly during stages B and C. The miniscrew-assisted rapid palatal expansion appliance was effective with sutural maturation stages A to C using the classification by Angelieri with a more parallel separation of the midpalatal sutures in stages B and C.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50806,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics\",\"volume\":\"166 6\",\"pages\":\"Pages 561-571\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0889540624003172\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0889540624003172","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
引言本研究旨在使用有限元方法评估在不同骨骼成熟度的患者身上使用牙-骨(TBB)或骨-骨(BB)装置进行上颌扩弓时微型螺钉所受的应力、骨骼和牙齿的变化。两种扩弓器的设计相似,但 BB 扩弓器缺少对牙齿的支撑(杆和带)。两种扩张器都借助 4 个微型螺钉作为骨性锚定装置放置在腭骨上。根据 Angelieri 的缝合成熟度分类法,对五个骨骼成熟阶段进行了检查。侧向位移为 0.2 毫米,模拟每天转动千斤顶螺钉一圈。结果A阶段的缝合成熟表现出最大的骨骼移动(0.13 毫米/天),呈 V 形位移模式。B 和 C 阶段表现出更平行的扩张模式。D 和 E 阶段使用任何一种装置,其骨骼移动量都最小。与 BB 装置相比,TBB 表现出更大的牙齿移位。根据 Angelieri 的分类,微型螺钉辅助快速腭侧扩张矫治器对 A 到 C 阶段的缝合成熟有效,B 和 C 阶段的腭中缝分离更加平行。
In-silico evaluation of orthodontic miniscrew-assisted rapid palatal expanders for patients with various stages of skeletal maturation
Introduction
This study aimed to use a finite element method to assess the stress on the miniscrews, skeletal and dental changes resulting from maxillary expansion using either a tooth-bone-borne (TBB) or a bone-borne (BB) device on patients with various skeletal maturation.
Methods
Two types of expanders were modeled using SolidWorks. The design of the 2 expanders was similar, with the exception that the BB appliance lacked support for teeth (rods and bands). Both were placed on the palatal bones with the help of 4 miniscrews as bony anchorage. Five skeletal maturation stages were examined using suture maturation classification by Angelieri. A lateral displacement of 0.2 mm was applied to simulate 1 turn of jackscrew per day. The dental and skeletal changes from the treatment were quantified.
Results
Stage A sutural maturation exhibited the greatest skeletal movement (0.13 mm/d) with a V-shaped displacement pattern. Stages B and C exhibited a more parallel expansion pattern. Stages D and E exhibited the least amount of skeletal movement with either device. Compared with the BB device, TBB demonstrated greater dental displacement. On average, the BB device exhibited a skeletal-to-dental expansion ratio of 70% from stage A to C compared with 49% with the TBB device.
Conclusions
BB device showed more skeletal displacement than TBB, and the latter showed more dental side effects, particularly during stages B and C. The miniscrew-assisted rapid palatal expansion appliance was effective with sutural maturation stages A to C using the classification by Angelieri with a more parallel separation of the midpalatal sutures in stages B and C.
期刊介绍:
Published for more than 100 years, the American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics remains the leading orthodontic resource. It is the official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, the American Board of Orthodontics, and the College of Diplomates of the American Board of Orthodontics. Each month its readers have access to original peer-reviewed articles that examine all phases of orthodontic treatment. Illustrated throughout, the publication includes tables, color photographs, and statistical data. Coverage includes successful diagnostic procedures, imaging techniques, bracket and archwire materials, extraction and impaction concerns, orthognathic surgery, TMJ disorders, removable appliances, and adult therapy.