利用随机森林、SVM 和 LSSVM 模型预测土壤导水性

IF 1.8 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Natural Resource Modeling Pub Date : 2024-09-17 DOI:10.1111/nrm.12407
Masumeh Farasati, Morteza Seyedian, Abolhasan Fathaabadi
{"title":"利用随机森林、SVM 和 LSSVM 模型预测土壤导水性","authors":"Masumeh Farasati, Morteza Seyedian, Abolhasan Fathaabadi","doi":"10.1111/nrm.12407","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Understanding the hydraulic properties of soil is essential to solve many management problems in agriculture and the environment. Water quality affects soil hydraulic conductivity. Soil hydraulic properties play an important role in nature's water cycle and are used as basic information in designing irrigation and drainage systems, hydrological issues, and soil quality assessment. In the current study, soil sampling is performed from different areas and its hydraulic conductivity was measured using the drop load method and then predicted using support vector machine (SVM) and least‐squares support vector machine (LSSVM) models. The model inputs were: soil texture (percentage of sand, silt, and clay particles), salinity (electrical conductivity), pH, sodium adsorption ratio, soil porosity, and bulk density and the output was soil hydraulic conductivity. Correlation coefficient, root mean square error (RMSE), mean bias error (MBE), and Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) were used to evaluate the models and compare them. Based on evaluation criteria the best performance was obtained for random forest (RF) (<jats:italic>R</jats:italic> = 0.89, RMSE = 0.53, mean absolute error (MAE) = 0.54, and NSE = 0.72). Following RF, the SVM with (<jats:italic>R</jats:italic> = 0.69, RMSE = 1.32, MAE = 0.69, and NSE = 0.48) performed better than LSSVM model.","PeriodicalId":49778,"journal":{"name":"Natural Resource Modeling","volume":"189 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predicting soil hydraulic conductivity using random forest, SVM, and LSSVM models\",\"authors\":\"Masumeh Farasati, Morteza Seyedian, Abolhasan Fathaabadi\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/nrm.12407\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Understanding the hydraulic properties of soil is essential to solve many management problems in agriculture and the environment. Water quality affects soil hydraulic conductivity. Soil hydraulic properties play an important role in nature's water cycle and are used as basic information in designing irrigation and drainage systems, hydrological issues, and soil quality assessment. In the current study, soil sampling is performed from different areas and its hydraulic conductivity was measured using the drop load method and then predicted using support vector machine (SVM) and least‐squares support vector machine (LSSVM) models. The model inputs were: soil texture (percentage of sand, silt, and clay particles), salinity (electrical conductivity), pH, sodium adsorption ratio, soil porosity, and bulk density and the output was soil hydraulic conductivity. Correlation coefficient, root mean square error (RMSE), mean bias error (MBE), and Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) were used to evaluate the models and compare them. Based on evaluation criteria the best performance was obtained for random forest (RF) (<jats:italic>R</jats:italic> = 0.89, RMSE = 0.53, mean absolute error (MAE) = 0.54, and NSE = 0.72). Following RF, the SVM with (<jats:italic>R</jats:italic> = 0.69, RMSE = 1.32, MAE = 0.69, and NSE = 0.48) performed better than LSSVM model.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49778,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Natural Resource Modeling\",\"volume\":\"189 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Natural Resource Modeling\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/nrm.12407\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Natural Resource Modeling","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nrm.12407","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

了解土壤的水力特性对于解决农业和环境中的许多管理问题至关重要。水质会影响土壤的导水性。土壤水力特性在自然界的水循环中发挥着重要作用,是设计灌溉和排水系统、水文问题和土壤质量评估的基本信息。在当前的研究中,对不同地区的土壤进行了取样,并使用落载法测量了土壤的水力传导性,然后使用支持向量机(SVM)和最小二乘支持向量机(LSSVM)模型进行了预测。模型输入为:土壤质地(砂、粉砂和粘土颗粒的百分比)、盐度(导电率)、pH 值、钠吸附率、土壤孔隙度和容重,输出为土壤导水性。相关系数、均方根误差(RMSE)、平均偏差误差(MBE)和纳什-苏特克利夫效率(NSE)被用来评估和比较这些模型。根据评估标准,随机森林(RF)的性能最佳(R = 0.89,RMSE = 0.53,平均绝对误差(MAE)= 0.54,NSE = 0.72)。继 RF 模型之后,SVM 模型(R = 0.69、RMSE = 1.32、MAE = 0.69 和 NSE = 0.48)的性能优于 LSSVM 模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Predicting soil hydraulic conductivity using random forest, SVM, and LSSVM models
Understanding the hydraulic properties of soil is essential to solve many management problems in agriculture and the environment. Water quality affects soil hydraulic conductivity. Soil hydraulic properties play an important role in nature's water cycle and are used as basic information in designing irrigation and drainage systems, hydrological issues, and soil quality assessment. In the current study, soil sampling is performed from different areas and its hydraulic conductivity was measured using the drop load method and then predicted using support vector machine (SVM) and least‐squares support vector machine (LSSVM) models. The model inputs were: soil texture (percentage of sand, silt, and clay particles), salinity (electrical conductivity), pH, sodium adsorption ratio, soil porosity, and bulk density and the output was soil hydraulic conductivity. Correlation coefficient, root mean square error (RMSE), mean bias error (MBE), and Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) were used to evaluate the models and compare them. Based on evaluation criteria the best performance was obtained for random forest (RF) (R = 0.89, RMSE = 0.53, mean absolute error (MAE) = 0.54, and NSE = 0.72). Following RF, the SVM with (R = 0.69, RMSE = 1.32, MAE = 0.69, and NSE = 0.48) performed better than LSSVM model.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Natural Resource Modeling
Natural Resource Modeling 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
6.20%
发文量
28
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: Natural Resource Modeling is an international journal devoted to mathematical modeling of natural resource systems. It reflects the conceptual and methodological core that is common to model building throughout disciplines including such fields as forestry, fisheries, economics and ecology. This core draws upon the analytical and methodological apparatus of mathematics, statistics, and scientific computing.
期刊最新文献
Predicting soil hydraulic conductivity using random forest, SVM, and LSSVM models The role of environmental tax in guiding global climate policies to mitigate climate changes in European region Predicting gully formation: An approach for assessing susceptibility and future risk Research on the impact of leadership on improving urban water efficiency and water conservation policies Assessing the load capacity curve hypothesis considering the green energy transition, banking sector expansion, and import price of crude oil in the United States
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1