Mathilda Whittle, Antoine MG Barreaux, Lee R Haines, Michael B Bonsall, Sinead English, Fleur Ponton
{"title":"宿主年龄和营养如何影响强制性细菌共生体与兼性细菌共生体的密度调节?采采蝇的启示","authors":"Mathilda Whittle, Antoine MG Barreaux, Lee R Haines, Michael B Bonsall, Sinead English, Fleur Ponton","doi":"10.1101/2024.09.13.612807","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The relationships between insect hosts and their symbionts can vary tremendously in the extent to which hosts depend on and control their symbionts. Obligate symbionts that provide micronutrients to their host are often compartmentalised to specialised host organs and depend on their hosts for survival, whereas facultative symbionts retain the ability to survive outside of their hosts. Few studies compare the extent to which a host controls and adjusts the density of obligate and facultative symbionts directly. Here, we used tsetse as a model for teasing apart the relationships between a host (Glossina morsitans morsitans) and obligate (Wigglesworthia glossinidia) and facultative (Sodalis glossinidius) symbionts. We hypothesised that tsetse actively regulate the density of Wigglesworthia according to the host's requirements, depending on their current nutritional state and developmental age. In contrast, we postulated that Sodalis retains some independence from host control, and that the growth of this symbiont is dependent on the conditions of the immediate environment, such as nutrient availability. Using qPCR, we examined how symbiont densities change across host age and the hunger cycle. Additionally, we investigated how host nutrition influences symbiont density, by comparing tsetse that were fed diluted blood (poor nutrition) or blood supplemented with yeast extract (vitamin enriched). We found that the density of Wigglesworthia did not reflect the nutritional status of the host, but was optimised to accommodate long-term host requirements (in terms of nutrient provisioning). In contrast, the density of facultative Sodalis was influenced by the ecological context (i.e. nutrient availability). This suggests that tsetse regulate the abundance of Wigglesworthia to a greater extent than Sodalis. We propose that tsetse exert only partial control over Sodalis growth due to the relatively recent transition of this symbiont to host-associated living.","PeriodicalId":501183,"journal":{"name":"bioRxiv - Evolutionary Biology","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How does host age and nutrition affect density regulation of obligate versus facultative bacterial symbionts? Insights from the tsetse fly\",\"authors\":\"Mathilda Whittle, Antoine MG Barreaux, Lee R Haines, Michael B Bonsall, Sinead English, Fleur Ponton\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2024.09.13.612807\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The relationships between insect hosts and their symbionts can vary tremendously in the extent to which hosts depend on and control their symbionts. Obligate symbionts that provide micronutrients to their host are often compartmentalised to specialised host organs and depend on their hosts for survival, whereas facultative symbionts retain the ability to survive outside of their hosts. Few studies compare the extent to which a host controls and adjusts the density of obligate and facultative symbionts directly. Here, we used tsetse as a model for teasing apart the relationships between a host (Glossina morsitans morsitans) and obligate (Wigglesworthia glossinidia) and facultative (Sodalis glossinidius) symbionts. We hypothesised that tsetse actively regulate the density of Wigglesworthia according to the host's requirements, depending on their current nutritional state and developmental age. In contrast, we postulated that Sodalis retains some independence from host control, and that the growth of this symbiont is dependent on the conditions of the immediate environment, such as nutrient availability. Using qPCR, we examined how symbiont densities change across host age and the hunger cycle. Additionally, we investigated how host nutrition influences symbiont density, by comparing tsetse that were fed diluted blood (poor nutrition) or blood supplemented with yeast extract (vitamin enriched). We found that the density of Wigglesworthia did not reflect the nutritional status of the host, but was optimised to accommodate long-term host requirements (in terms of nutrient provisioning). In contrast, the density of facultative Sodalis was influenced by the ecological context (i.e. nutrient availability). This suggests that tsetse regulate the abundance of Wigglesworthia to a greater extent than Sodalis. We propose that tsetse exert only partial control over Sodalis growth due to the relatively recent transition of this symbiont to host-associated living.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501183,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"bioRxiv - Evolutionary Biology\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"bioRxiv - Evolutionary Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.13.612807\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"bioRxiv - Evolutionary Biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.13.612807","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
昆虫宿主与其共生体之间的关系在宿主依赖和控制其共生体的程度上可能会有巨大的差异。为宿主提供微量营养元素的必须共生体通常被分隔到专门的宿主器官中,并依赖宿主生存,而兼性共生体则保留了在宿主之外生存的能力。很少有研究直接比较宿主控制和调整强制性共生体和兼性共生体密度的程度。在这里,我们以采采蝇为模型,分析宿主(Glossina morsitans morsitans)与必须共生体(Wigglesworthia glossinidia)和兼性共生体(Sodalis glossinidius)之间的关系。我们假设,采采蝇会根据宿主的需求,根据宿主当前的营养状况和发育年龄,积极调节 Wigglesworthia 的密度。与此相反,我们假设 Sodalis 不受宿主控制,这种共生体的生长取决于直接环境条件,如营养供应。通过 qPCR,我们研究了共生体密度在宿主年龄和饥饿周期中的变化。此外,我们还通过比较喂食稀释血液(营养不良)或补充了酵母提取物的血液(富含维生素)的采采蝇,研究了宿主营养如何影响共生体密度。我们发现,维格斯沃斯菌的密度并不反映宿主的营养状况,而是根据宿主的长期需求(营养供给方面)进行优化。与此相反,兼性索氏菌的密度受到生态环境(即营养供应)的影响。这表明,采采蝇对维格尔斯沃思藻数量的调节作用比索达里斯藻更大。我们认为,采采蝇只能部分控制Sodalis的生长,这是因为这种共生体最近才过渡到与宿主相关的生活方式。
How does host age and nutrition affect density regulation of obligate versus facultative bacterial symbionts? Insights from the tsetse fly
The relationships between insect hosts and their symbionts can vary tremendously in the extent to which hosts depend on and control their symbionts. Obligate symbionts that provide micronutrients to their host are often compartmentalised to specialised host organs and depend on their hosts for survival, whereas facultative symbionts retain the ability to survive outside of their hosts. Few studies compare the extent to which a host controls and adjusts the density of obligate and facultative symbionts directly. Here, we used tsetse as a model for teasing apart the relationships between a host (Glossina morsitans morsitans) and obligate (Wigglesworthia glossinidia) and facultative (Sodalis glossinidius) symbionts. We hypothesised that tsetse actively regulate the density of Wigglesworthia according to the host's requirements, depending on their current nutritional state and developmental age. In contrast, we postulated that Sodalis retains some independence from host control, and that the growth of this symbiont is dependent on the conditions of the immediate environment, such as nutrient availability. Using qPCR, we examined how symbiont densities change across host age and the hunger cycle. Additionally, we investigated how host nutrition influences symbiont density, by comparing tsetse that were fed diluted blood (poor nutrition) or blood supplemented with yeast extract (vitamin enriched). We found that the density of Wigglesworthia did not reflect the nutritional status of the host, but was optimised to accommodate long-term host requirements (in terms of nutrient provisioning). In contrast, the density of facultative Sodalis was influenced by the ecological context (i.e. nutrient availability). This suggests that tsetse regulate the abundance of Wigglesworthia to a greater extent than Sodalis. We propose that tsetse exert only partial control over Sodalis growth due to the relatively recent transition of this symbiont to host-associated living.