{"title":"新的直接总和测试","authors":"Alek Westover, Edward Yu, Kai Zheng","doi":"arxiv-2409.10464","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A function $f:[n]^{d} \\to \\mathbb{F}_2$ is a \\defn{direct sum} if there are\nfunctions $L_i:[n]\\to \\mathbb{F}_2$ such that ${f(x) = \\sum_{i}L_i(x_i)}$. In\nthis work we give multiple results related to the property testing of direct\nsums. Our first result concerns a test proposed by Dinur and Golubev in 2019. We\ncall their test the Diamond test and show that it is indeed a direct sum\ntester. More specifically, we show that if a function $f$ is $\\epsilon$-far\nfrom being a direct sum function, then the Diamond test rejects $f$ with\nprobability at least $\\Omega_{n,\\epsilon}(1)$. Even in the case of $n = 2$, the\nDiamond test is, to the best of our knowledge, novel and yields a new tester\nfor the classic property of affinity. Apart from the Diamond test, we also analyze a broad family of direct sum\ntests, which at a high level, run an arbitrary affinity test on the restriction\nof $f$ to a random hypercube inside of $[n]^d$. This family of tests includes\nthe direct sum test analyzed in \\cite{di19}, but does not include the Diamond\ntest. As an application of our result, we obtain a direct sum test which works\nin the online adversary model of \\cite{KRV}. Finally, we also discuss a Fourier analytic interpretation of the diamond\ntester in the $n=2$ case, as well as prove local correction results for direct\nsum as conjectured by Dinur and Golubev.","PeriodicalId":501024,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - CS - Computational Complexity","volume":"64 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"New Direct Sum Tests\",\"authors\":\"Alek Westover, Edward Yu, Kai Zheng\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2409.10464\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A function $f:[n]^{d} \\\\to \\\\mathbb{F}_2$ is a \\\\defn{direct sum} if there are\\nfunctions $L_i:[n]\\\\to \\\\mathbb{F}_2$ such that ${f(x) = \\\\sum_{i}L_i(x_i)}$. In\\nthis work we give multiple results related to the property testing of direct\\nsums. Our first result concerns a test proposed by Dinur and Golubev in 2019. We\\ncall their test the Diamond test and show that it is indeed a direct sum\\ntester. More specifically, we show that if a function $f$ is $\\\\epsilon$-far\\nfrom being a direct sum function, then the Diamond test rejects $f$ with\\nprobability at least $\\\\Omega_{n,\\\\epsilon}(1)$. Even in the case of $n = 2$, the\\nDiamond test is, to the best of our knowledge, novel and yields a new tester\\nfor the classic property of affinity. Apart from the Diamond test, we also analyze a broad family of direct sum\\ntests, which at a high level, run an arbitrary affinity test on the restriction\\nof $f$ to a random hypercube inside of $[n]^d$. This family of tests includes\\nthe direct sum test analyzed in \\\\cite{di19}, but does not include the Diamond\\ntest. As an application of our result, we obtain a direct sum test which works\\nin the online adversary model of \\\\cite{KRV}. Finally, we also discuss a Fourier analytic interpretation of the diamond\\ntester in the $n=2$ case, as well as prove local correction results for direct\\nsum as conjectured by Dinur and Golubev.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501024,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - CS - Computational Complexity\",\"volume\":\"64 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - CS - Computational Complexity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.10464\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - CS - Computational Complexity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.10464","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
A function $f:[n]^{d} \to \mathbb{F}_2$ is a \defn{direct sum} if there are
functions $L_i:[n]\to \mathbb{F}_2$ such that ${f(x) = \sum_{i}L_i(x_i)}$. In
this work we give multiple results related to the property testing of direct
sums. Our first result concerns a test proposed by Dinur and Golubev in 2019. We
call their test the Diamond test and show that it is indeed a direct sum
tester. More specifically, we show that if a function $f$ is $\epsilon$-far
from being a direct sum function, then the Diamond test rejects $f$ with
probability at least $\Omega_{n,\epsilon}(1)$. Even in the case of $n = 2$, the
Diamond test is, to the best of our knowledge, novel and yields a new tester
for the classic property of affinity. Apart from the Diamond test, we also analyze a broad family of direct sum
tests, which at a high level, run an arbitrary affinity test on the restriction
of $f$ to a random hypercube inside of $[n]^d$. This family of tests includes
the direct sum test analyzed in \cite{di19}, but does not include the Diamond
test. As an application of our result, we obtain a direct sum test which works
in the online adversary model of \cite{KRV}. Finally, we also discuss a Fourier analytic interpretation of the diamond
tester in the $n=2$ case, as well as prove local correction results for direct
sum as conjectured by Dinur and Golubev.