交换中值的复杂性和算法以及与其他共识问题的关系

Luís Cunha, Thiago Lopes, Arnaud Mary
{"title":"交换中值的复杂性和算法以及与其他共识问题的关系","authors":"Luís Cunha, Thiago Lopes, Arnaud Mary","doi":"arxiv-2409.09734","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Genome rearrangements are events in which large blocks of DNA exchange pieces\nduring evolution. The analysis of such events is a tool for understanding\nevolutionary genomics, based on finding the minimum number of rearrangements to\ntransform one genome into another. In a general scenario, more than two genomes\nare considered and we have new challenges. The {\\sc Median} problem consists in\nfinding, given three permutations and a distance metric, a permutation $s$ that\nminimizes the sum of the distances between $s$ and each input. We study the\n{\\sc median} problem over \\emph{swap} distances in permutations, for which the\ncomputational complexity has been open for almost 20 years (Eriksen,\n\\emph{Theor. Compt. Sci.}, 2007). We consider this problem through some\nbranches. We associate median solutions and interval convex sets, where the\nconcept of graph convexity inspires the following investigation: Does a median\npermutation belong to every shortest path between one of the pairs of input\npermutations? We are able to partially answer this question, and as a\nby-product we solve a long open problem by proving that the {\\sc Swap Median}\nproblem is NP-hard. Furthermore, using a similar approach, we show that the\n{\\sc Closest} problem, which seeks to minimize the maximum distance between the\nsolution and the input permutations, is NP-hard even considering three input\npermutations. This gives a sharp dichotomy into the P vs. NP-hard approaches,\nsince considering two input permutations the problem is easily solvable and\nconsidering any number of input permutations it is known to be NP-hard since\n2007 (Popov, \\emph{Theor. Compt. Sci.}, 2007). In addition, we show that {\\sc\nSwap Median} and {\\sc Swap Closest} are APX-hard problems.","PeriodicalId":501024,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - CS - Computational Complexity","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Complexity and algorithms for Swap median and relation to other consensus problems\",\"authors\":\"Luís Cunha, Thiago Lopes, Arnaud Mary\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2409.09734\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Genome rearrangements are events in which large blocks of DNA exchange pieces\\nduring evolution. The analysis of such events is a tool for understanding\\nevolutionary genomics, based on finding the minimum number of rearrangements to\\ntransform one genome into another. In a general scenario, more than two genomes\\nare considered and we have new challenges. The {\\\\sc Median} problem consists in\\nfinding, given three permutations and a distance metric, a permutation $s$ that\\nminimizes the sum of the distances between $s$ and each input. We study the\\n{\\\\sc median} problem over \\\\emph{swap} distances in permutations, for which the\\ncomputational complexity has been open for almost 20 years (Eriksen,\\n\\\\emph{Theor. Compt. Sci.}, 2007). We consider this problem through some\\nbranches. We associate median solutions and interval convex sets, where the\\nconcept of graph convexity inspires the following investigation: Does a median\\npermutation belong to every shortest path between one of the pairs of input\\npermutations? We are able to partially answer this question, and as a\\nby-product we solve a long open problem by proving that the {\\\\sc Swap Median}\\nproblem is NP-hard. Furthermore, using a similar approach, we show that the\\n{\\\\sc Closest} problem, which seeks to minimize the maximum distance between the\\nsolution and the input permutations, is NP-hard even considering three input\\npermutations. This gives a sharp dichotomy into the P vs. NP-hard approaches,\\nsince considering two input permutations the problem is easily solvable and\\nconsidering any number of input permutations it is known to be NP-hard since\\n2007 (Popov, \\\\emph{Theor. Compt. Sci.}, 2007). In addition, we show that {\\\\sc\\nSwap Median} and {\\\\sc Swap Closest} are APX-hard problems.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501024,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - CS - Computational Complexity\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - CS - Computational Complexity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.09734\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - CS - Computational Complexity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.09734","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

基因组重排是大块 DNA 在进化过程中交换片段的事件。对这类事件的分析是理解基因组进化的一种工具,其基础是找到将一个基因组转变为另一个基因组的最少重排次数。在一般情况下,我们需要考虑两个以上的基因组,这就给我们带来了新的挑战。{/sc中值}问题包括:在给定三个排列和一个距离度量的情况下,找到一个排列$s$,使$s$和每个输入之间的距离之和最小。我们研究的是排列组合中{emph{swap}距离的{sc中值}问题,这个问题的计算复杂度问题已经有近20年的历史了(Eriksen, \emph{Theor. Compt. Sci.},2007)。我们通过一些分支来考虑这个问题。我们把中值解和区间凸集联系起来,其中图凸性的概念启发了下面的研究:中值突变是否属于输入突变对之间的每一条最短路径?我们能够部分地回答这个问题,作为副产品,我们通过证明{交换中值}问题是 NP-hard的,解决了一个长期悬而未决的问题。此外,我们还用类似的方法证明了{\sc Closest}问题(该问题旨在最小化解与输入排列组合之间的最大距离)即使考虑三个输入排列组合也是 NP 难的。这给出了P与NP-hard方法的截然对立,因为考虑两个输入排列组合,这个问题很容易求解,而考虑任意数量的输入排列组合,这个问题自2007年以来就被认为是NP-hard的(Popov, \emph{Theor. Compt.)此外,我们还证明了 {\scSwap Median} 和 {\scSwap Closest} 是 APX 难问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Complexity and algorithms for Swap median and relation to other consensus problems
Genome rearrangements are events in which large blocks of DNA exchange pieces during evolution. The analysis of such events is a tool for understanding evolutionary genomics, based on finding the minimum number of rearrangements to transform one genome into another. In a general scenario, more than two genomes are considered and we have new challenges. The {\sc Median} problem consists in finding, given three permutations and a distance metric, a permutation $s$ that minimizes the sum of the distances between $s$ and each input. We study the {\sc median} problem over \emph{swap} distances in permutations, for which the computational complexity has been open for almost 20 years (Eriksen, \emph{Theor. Compt. Sci.}, 2007). We consider this problem through some branches. We associate median solutions and interval convex sets, where the concept of graph convexity inspires the following investigation: Does a median permutation belong to every shortest path between one of the pairs of input permutations? We are able to partially answer this question, and as a by-product we solve a long open problem by proving that the {\sc Swap Median} problem is NP-hard. Furthermore, using a similar approach, we show that the {\sc Closest} problem, which seeks to minimize the maximum distance between the solution and the input permutations, is NP-hard even considering three input permutations. This gives a sharp dichotomy into the P vs. NP-hard approaches, since considering two input permutations the problem is easily solvable and considering any number of input permutations it is known to be NP-hard since 2007 (Popov, \emph{Theor. Compt. Sci.}, 2007). In addition, we show that {\sc Swap Median} and {\sc Swap Closest} are APX-hard problems.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
New Direct Sum Tests Complexity and algorithms for Swap median and relation to other consensus problems Journalists, Emotions, and the Introduction of Generative AI Chatbots: A Large-Scale Analysis of Tweets Before and After the Launch of ChatGPT Almost-catalytic Computation Fast Simulation of Cellular Automata by Self-Composition
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1