用于检测粪便钙粘蛋白的颗粒增强比浊免疫分析法(PETIA)的临床性能。

Tieshan Wang,Wei Wang,Siying Zhu,Minsi Zhou,Peng Li,Jing Wu,Shutian Zhang,Haiyun Shi
{"title":"用于检测粪便钙粘蛋白的颗粒增强比浊免疫分析法(PETIA)的临床性能。","authors":"Tieshan Wang,Wei Wang,Siying Zhu,Minsi Zhou,Peng Li,Jing Wu,Shutian Zhang,Haiyun Shi","doi":"10.1080/00365513.2024.2403006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Particle-enhanced turbidimetric immunoassay (PETIA) is a new measurement procedure for detecting fecal calprotectin (FC). We aimed to investigate the accuracy and clinical performance of PETIA for FC. We assessed the accuracy of PETIA for FC measurements through concordance analysis, Passing-Bablok regression and Bland-Altman analysis, using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) as the reference. To evaluate the clinical performance of PETIA, the FC levels of individuals with significant and non-significant bowel diseases were compared. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to determine the appropriate cut-off value of FC detected by PETIA for discriminating subjects with significant and non-significant colorectal lesions. Of the 413 cases analyzed, 340 (82.3%) were concordant between PETIA and ELISA. No significant discordance was observed. There was a good agreement (y = -7.710+0.957x) between PETIA and ELISA for detecting FC. The FC level detected by PETIA in patients with significant bowel diseases (159.1 [31.3, 821.0] µg/g) was significantly higher than that of subjects with non-significant bowel diseases (10.3 [4.2, 38.5] µg/g) (p < 0.001). The AUC of FC for identifying significant bowel diseases detected by PETIA was 0.82 (p < 0.001). With a cut-off value of 77.6µg/g, the specificity and positive predictive value were 92.2% and 97.1%, respectively. The PETIA for FC measurement showed good clinical performance for detecting bowel diseases.","PeriodicalId":501634,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation","volume":"7 1","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical performance of a particle enhanced turbidimetric immunoassay (PETIA) for detecting fecal calprotectin.\",\"authors\":\"Tieshan Wang,Wei Wang,Siying Zhu,Minsi Zhou,Peng Li,Jing Wu,Shutian Zhang,Haiyun Shi\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00365513.2024.2403006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Particle-enhanced turbidimetric immunoassay (PETIA) is a new measurement procedure for detecting fecal calprotectin (FC). We aimed to investigate the accuracy and clinical performance of PETIA for FC. We assessed the accuracy of PETIA for FC measurements through concordance analysis, Passing-Bablok regression and Bland-Altman analysis, using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) as the reference. To evaluate the clinical performance of PETIA, the FC levels of individuals with significant and non-significant bowel diseases were compared. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to determine the appropriate cut-off value of FC detected by PETIA for discriminating subjects with significant and non-significant colorectal lesions. Of the 413 cases analyzed, 340 (82.3%) were concordant between PETIA and ELISA. No significant discordance was observed. There was a good agreement (y = -7.710+0.957x) between PETIA and ELISA for detecting FC. The FC level detected by PETIA in patients with significant bowel diseases (159.1 [31.3, 821.0] µg/g) was significantly higher than that of subjects with non-significant bowel diseases (10.3 [4.2, 38.5] µg/g) (p < 0.001). The AUC of FC for identifying significant bowel diseases detected by PETIA was 0.82 (p < 0.001). With a cut-off value of 77.6µg/g, the specificity and positive predictive value were 92.2% and 97.1%, respectively. The PETIA for FC measurement showed good clinical performance for detecting bowel diseases.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501634,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"1-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00365513.2024.2403006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00365513.2024.2403006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

微粒增强比浊免疫分析法(PETIA)是一种检测粪便钙粘蛋白(FC)的新方法。我们旨在研究 PETIA 检测 FC 的准确性和临床表现。我们以酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)为参照,通过一致性分析、Passing-Bablok回归和Bland-Altman分析评估了PETIA检测FC的准确性。为了评估 PETIA 的临床表现,比较了有明显和无明显肠道疾病患者的 FC 水平。通过接收器操作特征(ROC)分析,确定了 PETIA 检测到的 FC 的适当临界值,以区分有明显和无明显结直肠病变的受试者。在分析的 413 个病例中,340 个(82.3%)病例的 PETIA 和 ELISA 检测结果一致。没有观察到明显的不一致。PETIA 和 ELISA 检测 FC 的一致性很好(y = -7.710+0.957x)。有明显肠道疾病的患者通过 PETIA 检测到的 FC 水平(159.1 [31.3, 821.0] µg/g)明显高于无明显肠道疾病的受试者(10.3 [4.2, 38.5] µg/g)(p < 0.001)。通过 PETIA 检测出明显肠道疾病的 FC AUC 为 0.82(p < 0.001)。以 77.6µg/g 为临界值,特异性和阳性预测值分别为 92.2% 和 97.1%。用于 FC 测量的 PETIA 在检测肠道疾病方面表现出良好的临床性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Clinical performance of a particle enhanced turbidimetric immunoassay (PETIA) for detecting fecal calprotectin.
Particle-enhanced turbidimetric immunoassay (PETIA) is a new measurement procedure for detecting fecal calprotectin (FC). We aimed to investigate the accuracy and clinical performance of PETIA for FC. We assessed the accuracy of PETIA for FC measurements through concordance analysis, Passing-Bablok regression and Bland-Altman analysis, using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) as the reference. To evaluate the clinical performance of PETIA, the FC levels of individuals with significant and non-significant bowel diseases were compared. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to determine the appropriate cut-off value of FC detected by PETIA for discriminating subjects with significant and non-significant colorectal lesions. Of the 413 cases analyzed, 340 (82.3%) were concordant between PETIA and ELISA. No significant discordance was observed. There was a good agreement (y = -7.710+0.957x) between PETIA and ELISA for detecting FC. The FC level detected by PETIA in patients with significant bowel diseases (159.1 [31.3, 821.0] µg/g) was significantly higher than that of subjects with non-significant bowel diseases (10.3 [4.2, 38.5] µg/g) (p < 0.001). The AUC of FC for identifying significant bowel diseases detected by PETIA was 0.82 (p < 0.001). With a cut-off value of 77.6µg/g, the specificity and positive predictive value were 92.2% and 97.1%, respectively. The PETIA for FC measurement showed good clinical performance for detecting bowel diseases.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Clinical performance of a particle enhanced turbidimetric immunoassay (PETIA) for detecting fecal calprotectin. Salivary cortisol and cortisone are stable after long-term storage. Human papilloma virus vaccine induced thrombocytopenia accompanied by a wide spectrum of reversible inflammatory responses - a case report. Stability of serum placental growth factor (PlGF) and soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase 1 (sFlt-1) Linkage of cell division cycle 42 with clinical features, treatment response and survival in adult Philadelphia chromosome negative acute lymphoblastic leukemia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1