对长时间意识障碍患者的中文版痛觉昏迷量表(修订版)进行拉施分析

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION Clinical Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2024-09-14 DOI:10.1177/02692155241280524
Yuhang Zheng, Xinyou Lin, Yuehong Huang, Steven Laureys, Haibo Di
{"title":"对长时间意识障碍患者的中文版痛觉昏迷量表(修订版)进行拉施分析","authors":"Yuhang Zheng, Xinyou Lin, Yuehong Huang, Steven Laureys, Haibo Di","doi":"10.1177/02692155241280524","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to analyze the Chinese version of the Nociception Coma Scale–Revised in patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness within the framework of Rasch modeling, including investigating the invariance of total scores across different etiologies of disorders of consciousness.DesignProspective psychometric study.ParticipantsPatients with prolonged disorders of consciousness from the Rehabilitation and Neurology units in hospital.InterventionsNone.Main Outcome MeasureThe Nociception Coma Scale–Revised was undertaken by trained raters and the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised was used to assess patients’ consciousness. The psychometric properties within the Rasch model including item-person targeting, reliability and separation, item fit, unidimensionality, and differential item functioning were assessed.Results84 patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness (mean age 53 years; mean injury 5 months; 42 with Minimally Conscious State and 42 with Unresponsive Wakefulness Syndrome) of 252 observations were enrolled in the study. Through the procedure of repeated assessment and differential item function, a lower item bias Rasch set was purified. The Rasch model assumptions were examined and met, with item reliability and validity meeting the recommended threshold.ConclusionsThe Chinese version of the Nociception Coma Scale–Revised demonstrated unidimensionality, good reliability and separation, and good item fit, but dissatisfied person fit and item-person targeting. The verbal subscale showed a notable discrepancy between person responses and the difficulty of the items, suggesting limited clinical significance.","PeriodicalId":10441,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Rehabilitation","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rasch Analysis of the Chinese Version of the Nociception Coma Scale–Revised in Patients with Prolonged Disorders of Consciousness\",\"authors\":\"Yuhang Zheng, Xinyou Lin, Yuehong Huang, Steven Laureys, Haibo Di\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/02692155241280524\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to analyze the Chinese version of the Nociception Coma Scale–Revised in patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness within the framework of Rasch modeling, including investigating the invariance of total scores across different etiologies of disorders of consciousness.DesignProspective psychometric study.ParticipantsPatients with prolonged disorders of consciousness from the Rehabilitation and Neurology units in hospital.InterventionsNone.Main Outcome MeasureThe Nociception Coma Scale–Revised was undertaken by trained raters and the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised was used to assess patients’ consciousness. The psychometric properties within the Rasch model including item-person targeting, reliability and separation, item fit, unidimensionality, and differential item functioning were assessed.Results84 patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness (mean age 53 years; mean injury 5 months; 42 with Minimally Conscious State and 42 with Unresponsive Wakefulness Syndrome) of 252 observations were enrolled in the study. Through the procedure of repeated assessment and differential item function, a lower item bias Rasch set was purified. The Rasch model assumptions were examined and met, with item reliability and validity meeting the recommended threshold.ConclusionsThe Chinese version of the Nociception Coma Scale–Revised demonstrated unidimensionality, good reliability and separation, and good item fit, but dissatisfied person fit and item-person targeting. The verbal subscale showed a notable discrepancy between person responses and the difficulty of the items, suggesting limited clinical significance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10441,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/02692155241280524\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02692155241280524","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的在Rasch模型的框架内分析中文版《痛觉昏迷量表(修订版)》在长期意识障碍患者中的应用情况,包括研究总分在不同病因引起的意识障碍中的不变性。干预措施无。主要结果测量由训练有素的评分员对患者进行痛觉昏迷量表(Nociception Coma Scale-Revised)评分,并使用昏迷恢复量表(Coma Recovery Scale-Revised)对患者的意识进行评估。评估了 Rasch 模型中的心理计量特性,包括项目-人目标、可靠性和分离度、项目拟合、单维性和差异项目功能。通过重复评估和差异项目功能的程序,纯化了一个项目偏差较低的 Rasch 集。结论中文版痛觉昏迷量表(修订版)具有单维性、良好的信度和分离度、良好的项目拟合度,但人的拟合度和项目-人的目标性不理想。言语分量表显示出人的反应与项目难度之间存在明显差异,这表明其临床意义有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Rasch Analysis of the Chinese Version of the Nociception Coma Scale–Revised in Patients with Prolonged Disorders of Consciousness
ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to analyze the Chinese version of the Nociception Coma Scale–Revised in patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness within the framework of Rasch modeling, including investigating the invariance of total scores across different etiologies of disorders of consciousness.DesignProspective psychometric study.ParticipantsPatients with prolonged disorders of consciousness from the Rehabilitation and Neurology units in hospital.InterventionsNone.Main Outcome MeasureThe Nociception Coma Scale–Revised was undertaken by trained raters and the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised was used to assess patients’ consciousness. The psychometric properties within the Rasch model including item-person targeting, reliability and separation, item fit, unidimensionality, and differential item functioning were assessed.Results84 patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness (mean age 53 years; mean injury 5 months; 42 with Minimally Conscious State and 42 with Unresponsive Wakefulness Syndrome) of 252 observations were enrolled in the study. Through the procedure of repeated assessment and differential item function, a lower item bias Rasch set was purified. The Rasch model assumptions were examined and met, with item reliability and validity meeting the recommended threshold.ConclusionsThe Chinese version of the Nociception Coma Scale–Revised demonstrated unidimensionality, good reliability and separation, and good item fit, but dissatisfied person fit and item-person targeting. The verbal subscale showed a notable discrepancy between person responses and the difficulty of the items, suggesting limited clinical significance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Rehabilitation
Clinical Rehabilitation 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
117
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Rehabilitation covering the whole field of disability and rehabilitation, this peer-reviewed journal publishes research and discussion articles and acts as a forum for the international dissemination and exchange of information amongst the large number of professionals involved in rehabilitation. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)
期刊最新文献
Physiotherapy-led care versus physician-led care for persons with low back pain: A systematic review. Effects of osteopathic manipulative treatment associated with transcranial direct current stimulation in individuals with chronic low back pain: A double-blind, randomised placebo-controlled trial. Efficacy of pelvic floor muscle training with physical therapy for low back pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Prognostic factors of pain, disability, and poor outcomes in persons with neck pain - an umbrella review. Working towards consensus on the assessment of mood after severe acquired brain injury: Focus groups with UK-based professionals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1