加利福尼亚湾两种同域海豚的哨音结构变异

IF 2.2 3区 生物学 Q1 MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY Hydrobiologia Pub Date : 2024-09-16 DOI:10.1007/s10750-024-05675-3
Simone Antichi, Manali Rege‑Colt, Maia Austin, Laura J. May‑Collado, Óscar Carlón-Beltrán, Jorge Urbán R., Sergio Martínez-Aguilar, Lorena Viloria-Gómora
{"title":"加利福尼亚湾两种同域海豚的哨音结构变异","authors":"Simone Antichi, Manali Rege‑Colt, Maia Austin, Laura J. May‑Collado, Óscar Carlón-Beltrán, Jorge Urbán R., Sergio Martínez-Aguilar, Lorena Viloria-Gómora","doi":"10.1007/s10750-024-05675-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Dolphins produce narrowband and frequency modulated sounds called whistles during a variety of behavioral contexts. Dolphin species vary in their whistle contour composition, frequency range, modulation, and duration, and these differences can be useful in their identification. Here, we compare the whistle contours of two sympatric dolphin species at La Paz Bay, Gulf of California, the Eastern Tropical Pacific bottlenose dolphin, and the long-beaked common dolphin. Dolphins were recorded (7 h and 1 min recording effort) from the research vessel with the engine off using an over-the-side hydrophone and a broadband recording system. A total of 666 high quality whistles (bottlenose dolphin, <i>n</i> = 415; long-beaked common dolphin, <i>n</i> = 251) were analyzed. A Random Forest Analysis identified duration, ending frequency, and maximum frequency as the most important variables that distinguish the two dolphin species. The most common whistle contour types of bottlenose dolphins were sine and convex, while the long-beaked common dolphins produced mainly upsweep and concave whistles. The results showed that bottlenose dolphins and long-beaked common dolphins differ in their whistle variables and contours facilitating their identification in future passive acoustic studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":13147,"journal":{"name":"Hydrobiologia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Whistle structure variation between two sympatric dolphin species in the Gulf of California\",\"authors\":\"Simone Antichi, Manali Rege‑Colt, Maia Austin, Laura J. May‑Collado, Óscar Carlón-Beltrán, Jorge Urbán R., Sergio Martínez-Aguilar, Lorena Viloria-Gómora\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10750-024-05675-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Dolphins produce narrowband and frequency modulated sounds called whistles during a variety of behavioral contexts. Dolphin species vary in their whistle contour composition, frequency range, modulation, and duration, and these differences can be useful in their identification. Here, we compare the whistle contours of two sympatric dolphin species at La Paz Bay, Gulf of California, the Eastern Tropical Pacific bottlenose dolphin, and the long-beaked common dolphin. Dolphins were recorded (7 h and 1 min recording effort) from the research vessel with the engine off using an over-the-side hydrophone and a broadband recording system. A total of 666 high quality whistles (bottlenose dolphin, <i>n</i> = 415; long-beaked common dolphin, <i>n</i> = 251) were analyzed. A Random Forest Analysis identified duration, ending frequency, and maximum frequency as the most important variables that distinguish the two dolphin species. The most common whistle contour types of bottlenose dolphins were sine and convex, while the long-beaked common dolphins produced mainly upsweep and concave whistles. The results showed that bottlenose dolphins and long-beaked common dolphins differ in their whistle variables and contours facilitating their identification in future passive acoustic studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13147,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hydrobiologia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hydrobiologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-024-05675-3\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hydrobiologia","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-024-05675-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

海豚在各种行为背景下都会发出窄带和频率调制的声音,即哨声。海豚的种类在哨声轮廓组成、频率范围、调制和持续时间上各不相同,这些差异有助于识别海豚。在此,我们比较了加利福尼亚湾拉巴斯湾的两种同域海豚--东热带太平洋瓶鼻海豚和长喙普通海豚--的哨音轮廓。在研究船上,使用侧向水听器和宽带记录系统,在关闭发动机的情况下对海豚进行了记录(7 小时 1 分钟的记录工作)。共分析了 666 次高质量的口哨声(瓶鼻海豚,n = 415;长喙普通海豚,n = 251)。随机森林分析确定了持续时间、终止频率和最高频率是区分两种海豚的最重要变量。瓶鼻海豚最常见的哨音轮廓类型是正弦和凸形,而长喙普通海豚则主要发出上扫和凹形哨音。研究结果表明,瓶鼻海豚和长喙普通海豚在哨音变量和轮廓上存在差异,这有助于在未来的被动声学研究中识别它们。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Whistle structure variation between two sympatric dolphin species in the Gulf of California

Dolphins produce narrowband and frequency modulated sounds called whistles during a variety of behavioral contexts. Dolphin species vary in their whistle contour composition, frequency range, modulation, and duration, and these differences can be useful in their identification. Here, we compare the whistle contours of two sympatric dolphin species at La Paz Bay, Gulf of California, the Eastern Tropical Pacific bottlenose dolphin, and the long-beaked common dolphin. Dolphins were recorded (7 h and 1 min recording effort) from the research vessel with the engine off using an over-the-side hydrophone and a broadband recording system. A total of 666 high quality whistles (bottlenose dolphin, n = 415; long-beaked common dolphin, n = 251) were analyzed. A Random Forest Analysis identified duration, ending frequency, and maximum frequency as the most important variables that distinguish the two dolphin species. The most common whistle contour types of bottlenose dolphins were sine and convex, while the long-beaked common dolphins produced mainly upsweep and concave whistles. The results showed that bottlenose dolphins and long-beaked common dolphins differ in their whistle variables and contours facilitating their identification in future passive acoustic studies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Hydrobiologia
Hydrobiologia 生物-海洋与淡水生物学
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
11.50%
发文量
288
审稿时长
4.9 months
期刊介绍: Hydrobiologia publishes original research, reviews and opinions regarding the biology of all aquatic environments, including the impact of human activities. We welcome molecular-, organism-, community- and ecosystem-level studies in contributions dealing with limnology and oceanography, including systematics and aquatic ecology. Hypothesis-driven experimental research is preferred, but also theoretical papers or articles with large descriptive content will be considered, provided they are made relevant to a broad hydrobiological audience. Applied aspects will be considered if firmly embedded in an ecological context.
期刊最新文献
Parasitology of one of the world’s foremost fisheries target species lacks a One Health approach Whistle structure variation between two sympatric dolphin species in the Gulf of California In situ estimation of phytoplankton community growth rate inside dialysis membrane bags: a bioassay experiment at a fish farm in the eastern Aegean Sea Increasing agricultural land use in riparian networks negatively affects stream fish communities in a tropical savanna Publisher Correction: Comparing long-term changes in cladoceran and diatom assemblages from a lake impacted by road salt seepage to a nearby reference lake near Toronto (Ontario, Canada)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1