开发机器学习模型,培训初级眼科医生诊断临床前角膜炎

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Frontiers in Medicine Pub Date : 2024-09-18 DOI:10.3389/fmed.2024.1458356
Yang Jiang, Hanyu Jiang, Jing Zhang, Tao Chen, Ying Li, Yuehua Zhou, Youxin Chen, Fusheng Li
{"title":"开发机器学习模型,培训初级眼科医生诊断临床前角膜炎","authors":"Yang Jiang, Hanyu Jiang, Jing Zhang, Tao Chen, Ying Li, Yuehua Zhou, Youxin Chen, Fusheng Li","doi":"10.3389/fmed.2024.1458356","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis study aims to evaluate the diagnostic performance of a machine learning model (ML model) to train junior ophthalmologists in detecting preclinical keratoconus (PKC).MethodsA total of 1,334 corneal topography images (The Pentacam HR system) from 413 keratoconus eyes, 32 PKC eyes and 222 normal eyes were collected. Five junior ophthalmologists were trained and annotated the images with or without the suggestions proposed by the ML model. The diagnostic performance of PKC was evaluated among three groups: junior ophthalmologist group (control group), ML model group and ML model-training junior ophthalmologist group (test group).ResultsThe accuracy of the ML model between the eyes of patients with KC and NEs in all three clinics (99% accuracy, area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve AUC of 1.00, 99% sensitivity, 99% specificity) was higher than that for Belin-Ambrósio enhanced ectasia display total deviation (BAD-D) (86% accuracy, AUC of 0.97, 97% sensitivity, 69% specificity). The accuracy of the ML model between eyes with PKC and NEs in all three clinics (98% accuracy, AUC of 0.96, 98% sensitivity, 98% specificity) was higher than that of BAD-D (69% accuracy, AUC of 0.73, 67% sensitivity, 69% specificity). The diagnostic accuracy of PKC was 47.5% (95%CI, 0.5–71.6%), 100% (95%CI, 100–100%) and 94.4% (95%CI, 14.7–94.7%) in the control group, ML model group and test group. With the assistance of the proposed ML model, the diagnostic accuracy of junior ophthalmologists improved with statistical significance (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> &amp;lt; 0.05). According to the questionnaire of all the junior ophthalmologists, the average score was 4 (total 5) regarding to the comprehensiveness that the AI model has been in their keratoconus diagnosis learning; the average score was 4.4 (total 5) regarding to the convenience that the AI model has been in their keratoconus diagnosis learning.ConclusionThe proposed ML model provided a novel approach for the detection of PKC with high diagnostic accuracy and assisted to improve the performance of junior ophthalmologists, resulting especially in reducing the risk of missed diagnoses.","PeriodicalId":12488,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The development of a machine learning model to train junior ophthalmologists in diagnosing the pre-clinical keratoconus\",\"authors\":\"Yang Jiang, Hanyu Jiang, Jing Zhang, Tao Chen, Ying Li, Yuehua Zhou, Youxin Chen, Fusheng Li\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fmed.2024.1458356\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PurposeThis study aims to evaluate the diagnostic performance of a machine learning model (ML model) to train junior ophthalmologists in detecting preclinical keratoconus (PKC).MethodsA total of 1,334 corneal topography images (The Pentacam HR system) from 413 keratoconus eyes, 32 PKC eyes and 222 normal eyes were collected. Five junior ophthalmologists were trained and annotated the images with or without the suggestions proposed by the ML model. The diagnostic performance of PKC was evaluated among three groups: junior ophthalmologist group (control group), ML model group and ML model-training junior ophthalmologist group (test group).ResultsThe accuracy of the ML model between the eyes of patients with KC and NEs in all three clinics (99% accuracy, area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve AUC of 1.00, 99% sensitivity, 99% specificity) was higher than that for Belin-Ambrósio enhanced ectasia display total deviation (BAD-D) (86% accuracy, AUC of 0.97, 97% sensitivity, 69% specificity). The accuracy of the ML model between eyes with PKC and NEs in all three clinics (98% accuracy, AUC of 0.96, 98% sensitivity, 98% specificity) was higher than that of BAD-D (69% accuracy, AUC of 0.73, 67% sensitivity, 69% specificity). The diagnostic accuracy of PKC was 47.5% (95%CI, 0.5–71.6%), 100% (95%CI, 100–100%) and 94.4% (95%CI, 14.7–94.7%) in the control group, ML model group and test group. With the assistance of the proposed ML model, the diagnostic accuracy of junior ophthalmologists improved with statistical significance (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> &amp;lt; 0.05). According to the questionnaire of all the junior ophthalmologists, the average score was 4 (total 5) regarding to the comprehensiveness that the AI model has been in their keratoconus diagnosis learning; the average score was 4.4 (total 5) regarding to the convenience that the AI model has been in their keratoconus diagnosis learning.ConclusionThe proposed ML model provided a novel approach for the detection of PKC with high diagnostic accuracy and assisted to improve the performance of junior ophthalmologists, resulting especially in reducing the risk of missed diagnoses.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12488,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2024.1458356\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2024.1458356","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的 本研究旨在评估机器学习模型(ML 模型)在培训初级眼科医生检测临床前角膜病(PKC)方面的诊断性能。方法 收集了来自 413 只角膜病眼、32 只 PKC 眼和 222 只正常眼的共计 1,334 张角膜地形图图像(Pentacam HR 系统)。五名初级眼科医生接受了培训,并根据或不根据 ML 模型提出的建议对图像进行了注释。评估了三组初级眼科医生组(对照组)、ML 模型组和接受过 ML 模型培训的初级眼科医生组(测试组)的 PKC 诊断性能。结果 在所有三个诊所中,KC 和 NE 患者眼球之间的 ML 模型准确率(准确率 99%,接收器操作特征曲线下面积 AUC 为 1.00,灵敏度 99%,特异性 99%)高于 Belin-Ambrósio 增强外伤显示总偏差(BAD-D)(准确率 86%,接收器操作特征曲线下面积 AUC 为 0.97,灵敏度 97%,特异性 69%)。在所有三家诊所中,ML 模型在 PKC 和 NEs 眼之间的准确率(准确率 98%,AUC 为 0.96,敏感性 98%,特异性 98%)高于 BAD-D(准确率 69%,AUC 为 0.73,敏感性 67%,特异性 69%)。在对照组、ML 模型组和测试组中,PKC 的诊断准确率分别为 47.5%(95%CI,0.5-71.6%)、100%(95%CI,100-100%)和 94.4%(95%CI,14.7-94.7%)。在所提出的 ML 模型的帮助下,初级眼科医生的诊断准确率有所提高,且有统计学意义(p &;lt;0.05)。根据对所有初级眼科医生的问卷调查,对于人工智能模型在其角膜病诊断学习中的全面性,平均得分为 4 分(总分 5 分);对于人工智能模型在其角膜病诊断学习中的便利性,平均得分为 4.4 分(总分 5 分)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The development of a machine learning model to train junior ophthalmologists in diagnosing the pre-clinical keratoconus
PurposeThis study aims to evaluate the diagnostic performance of a machine learning model (ML model) to train junior ophthalmologists in detecting preclinical keratoconus (PKC).MethodsA total of 1,334 corneal topography images (The Pentacam HR system) from 413 keratoconus eyes, 32 PKC eyes and 222 normal eyes were collected. Five junior ophthalmologists were trained and annotated the images with or without the suggestions proposed by the ML model. The diagnostic performance of PKC was evaluated among three groups: junior ophthalmologist group (control group), ML model group and ML model-training junior ophthalmologist group (test group).ResultsThe accuracy of the ML model between the eyes of patients with KC and NEs in all three clinics (99% accuracy, area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve AUC of 1.00, 99% sensitivity, 99% specificity) was higher than that for Belin-Ambrósio enhanced ectasia display total deviation (BAD-D) (86% accuracy, AUC of 0.97, 97% sensitivity, 69% specificity). The accuracy of the ML model between eyes with PKC and NEs in all three clinics (98% accuracy, AUC of 0.96, 98% sensitivity, 98% specificity) was higher than that of BAD-D (69% accuracy, AUC of 0.73, 67% sensitivity, 69% specificity). The diagnostic accuracy of PKC was 47.5% (95%CI, 0.5–71.6%), 100% (95%CI, 100–100%) and 94.4% (95%CI, 14.7–94.7%) in the control group, ML model group and test group. With the assistance of the proposed ML model, the diagnostic accuracy of junior ophthalmologists improved with statistical significance (p &lt; 0.05). According to the questionnaire of all the junior ophthalmologists, the average score was 4 (total 5) regarding to the comprehensiveness that the AI model has been in their keratoconus diagnosis learning; the average score was 4.4 (total 5) regarding to the convenience that the AI model has been in their keratoconus diagnosis learning.ConclusionThe proposed ML model provided a novel approach for the detection of PKC with high diagnostic accuracy and assisted to improve the performance of junior ophthalmologists, resulting especially in reducing the risk of missed diagnoses.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Medicine
Frontiers in Medicine Medicine-General Medicine
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
5.10%
发文量
3710
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Medicine publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research linking basic research to clinical practice and patient care, as well as translating scientific advances into new therapies and diagnostic tools. Led by an outstanding Editorial Board of international experts, this multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide. In addition to papers that provide a link between basic research and clinical practice, a particular emphasis is given to studies that are directly relevant to patient care. In this spirit, the journal publishes the latest research results and medical knowledge that facilitate the translation of scientific advances into new therapies or diagnostic tools. The full listing of the Specialty Sections represented by Frontiers in Medicine is as listed below. As well as the established medical disciplines, Frontiers in Medicine is launching new sections that together will facilitate - the use of patient-reported outcomes under real world conditions - the exploitation of big data and the use of novel information and communication tools in the assessment of new medicines - the scientific bases for guidelines and decisions from regulatory authorities - access to medicinal products and medical devices worldwide - addressing the grand health challenges around the world
期刊最新文献
Adult diffuse hepatic hemangiomatosis lesion occupying the entire abdominal and pelvic cavities: a case report. Applications of optical coherence tomography angiography in glaucoma: current status and future directions. Case report: A suspected case of chronic pulmonary sparganosis characterized by migrating cavities and tunnel sign. Comparing the effectiveness and safety of videolaryngoscopy and direct laryngoscopy for endotracheal intubation in the paediatric emergency department: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Comparison of ustekinumab, infliximab and combination therapy in moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis - a study protocol of a randomized, multicenter, head-to-head COMBO-UC trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1