治疗斑块状银屑病的联合生物制剂与标准疗法的疗效比较:回顾性分析

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Frontiers in Medicine Pub Date : 2024-09-18 DOI:10.3389/fmed.2024.1451069
Bo Wu, Qian Chen, Rong Cao, Lei Zhu, Hongyan Zhu
{"title":"治疗斑块状银屑病的联合生物制剂与标准疗法的疗效比较:回顾性分析","authors":"Bo Wu, Qian Chen, Rong Cao, Lei Zhu, Hongyan Zhu","doi":"10.3389/fmed.2024.1451069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"IntroductionPlaque psoriasis is a persistent skin disorder that necessitates efficient management. This study investigates the therapeutic effectiveness and timeline for skin lesion resolution in plaque psoriasis patients treated with combined biologic agents compared to standard therapies.MethodsConducted retrospectively between March 2020 and March 2023, the study included 162 patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. Participants were divided into two groups: the Control Group, which received standard treatments, and the Combined Biologic Agent Group, which received additional biologic therapy with secukinumab. Participants in the Control Group received standard treatments, while those in the Combined Biologic Agent Group received standard treatments plus secukinumab.ResultsThe results showed that the Combined Biologic Agent Group experienced a significantly faster onset of therapeutic effects, with an average time of 3.04 ± 2.25 days compared to 6.12 ± 2.06 days in the Control Group. Additionally, skin lesion resolution occurred more rapidly in the biologic agent group (7.04 ± 2.13 days) than in the control group (14.56 ± 4.73 days). By week 24, the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) scores demonstrated a more substantial reduction in the biologic agent group, decreasing from 26.98 ± 11.28 to 2.48 ± 3.01, whereas the control group showed a reduction from 25.82 ± 10.47 to 10.40 ± 7.63. The overall effectiveness rate was higher in the biologic agent group, with no cases of ineffectiveness, compared to a 20.99% ineffectiveness rate in the control group. Furthermore, there was no recurrence of the disease in the biologic agent group, while the control group experienced an 11.11% recurrence rate. Both groups had a similar incidence of adverse reactions, indicating that the addition of biologic agents does not significantly increase the risk of adverse events.DiscussionThese findings suggest that combined biologic agent therapy offers a more effective and faster treatment option for plaque psoriasis without compromising safety. However, larger-scale clinical trials are necessary to validate these results and establish the long-term benefits and safety of this treatment approach in diverse patient populations.","PeriodicalId":12488,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative effectiveness of combined biologic agents versus standard therapies in the treatment of plaque psoriasis: a retrospective analysis\",\"authors\":\"Bo Wu, Qian Chen, Rong Cao, Lei Zhu, Hongyan Zhu\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fmed.2024.1451069\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"IntroductionPlaque psoriasis is a persistent skin disorder that necessitates efficient management. This study investigates the therapeutic effectiveness and timeline for skin lesion resolution in plaque psoriasis patients treated with combined biologic agents compared to standard therapies.MethodsConducted retrospectively between March 2020 and March 2023, the study included 162 patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. Participants were divided into two groups: the Control Group, which received standard treatments, and the Combined Biologic Agent Group, which received additional biologic therapy with secukinumab. Participants in the Control Group received standard treatments, while those in the Combined Biologic Agent Group received standard treatments plus secukinumab.ResultsThe results showed that the Combined Biologic Agent Group experienced a significantly faster onset of therapeutic effects, with an average time of 3.04 ± 2.25 days compared to 6.12 ± 2.06 days in the Control Group. Additionally, skin lesion resolution occurred more rapidly in the biologic agent group (7.04 ± 2.13 days) than in the control group (14.56 ± 4.73 days). By week 24, the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) scores demonstrated a more substantial reduction in the biologic agent group, decreasing from 26.98 ± 11.28 to 2.48 ± 3.01, whereas the control group showed a reduction from 25.82 ± 10.47 to 10.40 ± 7.63. The overall effectiveness rate was higher in the biologic agent group, with no cases of ineffectiveness, compared to a 20.99% ineffectiveness rate in the control group. Furthermore, there was no recurrence of the disease in the biologic agent group, while the control group experienced an 11.11% recurrence rate. Both groups had a similar incidence of adverse reactions, indicating that the addition of biologic agents does not significantly increase the risk of adverse events.DiscussionThese findings suggest that combined biologic agent therapy offers a more effective and faster treatment option for plaque psoriasis without compromising safety. However, larger-scale clinical trials are necessary to validate these results and establish the long-term benefits and safety of this treatment approach in diverse patient populations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12488,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2024.1451069\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2024.1451069","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言斑块型银屑病是一种顽固性皮肤疾病,需要有效的治疗。本研究调查了与标准疗法相比,联合生物制剂治疗斑块状银屑病患者的疗效和皮损消退时间表。研究方法在 2020 年 3 月至 2023 年 3 月期间进行回顾性研究,共纳入 162 例中度至重度斑块状银屑病患者。参与者被分为两组:对照组(接受标准疗法)和联合生物制剂组(接受secukinumab的额外生物制剂疗法)。结果显示,联合生物制剂组的疗效起效明显更快,平均为 3.04 ± 2.25 天,而对照组为 6.12 ± 2.06 天。此外,生物制剂组的皮损消退时间(7.04±2.13 天)比对照组(14.56±4.73 天)更快。到第 24 周时,生物制剂组的银屑病面积和严重程度指数(PASI)得分有了更大幅度的下降,从 26.98 ± 11.28 降至 2.48 ± 3.01,而对照组则从 25.82 ± 10.47 降至 10.40 ± 7.63。生物制剂组的总体有效率更高,没有无效病例,而对照组的无效率为 20.99%。此外,生物制剂组没有复发病例,而对照组的复发率为 11.11%。两组的不良反应发生率相似,表明添加生物制剂并不会显著增加不良反应的风险。 讨论这些研究结果表明,联合生物制剂疗法为斑块状银屑病提供了更有效、更快速的治疗方案,同时又不影响安全性。然而,有必要进行更大规模的临床试验来验证这些结果,并确定这种治疗方法在不同患者群体中的长期疗效和安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparative effectiveness of combined biologic agents versus standard therapies in the treatment of plaque psoriasis: a retrospective analysis
IntroductionPlaque psoriasis is a persistent skin disorder that necessitates efficient management. This study investigates the therapeutic effectiveness and timeline for skin lesion resolution in plaque psoriasis patients treated with combined biologic agents compared to standard therapies.MethodsConducted retrospectively between March 2020 and March 2023, the study included 162 patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. Participants were divided into two groups: the Control Group, which received standard treatments, and the Combined Biologic Agent Group, which received additional biologic therapy with secukinumab. Participants in the Control Group received standard treatments, while those in the Combined Biologic Agent Group received standard treatments plus secukinumab.ResultsThe results showed that the Combined Biologic Agent Group experienced a significantly faster onset of therapeutic effects, with an average time of 3.04 ± 2.25 days compared to 6.12 ± 2.06 days in the Control Group. Additionally, skin lesion resolution occurred more rapidly in the biologic agent group (7.04 ± 2.13 days) than in the control group (14.56 ± 4.73 days). By week 24, the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) scores demonstrated a more substantial reduction in the biologic agent group, decreasing from 26.98 ± 11.28 to 2.48 ± 3.01, whereas the control group showed a reduction from 25.82 ± 10.47 to 10.40 ± 7.63. The overall effectiveness rate was higher in the biologic agent group, with no cases of ineffectiveness, compared to a 20.99% ineffectiveness rate in the control group. Furthermore, there was no recurrence of the disease in the biologic agent group, while the control group experienced an 11.11% recurrence rate. Both groups had a similar incidence of adverse reactions, indicating that the addition of biologic agents does not significantly increase the risk of adverse events.DiscussionThese findings suggest that combined biologic agent therapy offers a more effective and faster treatment option for plaque psoriasis without compromising safety. However, larger-scale clinical trials are necessary to validate these results and establish the long-term benefits and safety of this treatment approach in diverse patient populations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Medicine
Frontiers in Medicine Medicine-General Medicine
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
5.10%
发文量
3710
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Medicine publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research linking basic research to clinical practice and patient care, as well as translating scientific advances into new therapies and diagnostic tools. Led by an outstanding Editorial Board of international experts, this multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide. In addition to papers that provide a link between basic research and clinical practice, a particular emphasis is given to studies that are directly relevant to patient care. In this spirit, the journal publishes the latest research results and medical knowledge that facilitate the translation of scientific advances into new therapies or diagnostic tools. The full listing of the Specialty Sections represented by Frontiers in Medicine is as listed below. As well as the established medical disciplines, Frontiers in Medicine is launching new sections that together will facilitate - the use of patient-reported outcomes under real world conditions - the exploitation of big data and the use of novel information and communication tools in the assessment of new medicines - the scientific bases for guidelines and decisions from regulatory authorities - access to medicinal products and medical devices worldwide - addressing the grand health challenges around the world
期刊最新文献
Adult diffuse hepatic hemangiomatosis lesion occupying the entire abdominal and pelvic cavities: a case report. Applications of optical coherence tomography angiography in glaucoma: current status and future directions. Case report: A suspected case of chronic pulmonary sparganosis characterized by migrating cavities and tunnel sign. Comparing the effectiveness and safety of videolaryngoscopy and direct laryngoscopy for endotracheal intubation in the paediatric emergency department: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Comparison of ustekinumab, infliximab and combination therapy in moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis - a study protocol of a randomized, multicenter, head-to-head COMBO-UC trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1