在无人机获取的甚高分辨率可见光图像中识别城市化区域

IF 4.2 2区 地球科学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Remote Sensing Pub Date : 2024-09-17 DOI:10.3390/rs16183444
Edyta Puniach, Wojciech Gruszczyński, Paweł Ćwiąkała, Katarzyna Strząbała, Elżbieta Pastucha
{"title":"在无人机获取的甚高分辨率可见光图像中识别城市化区域","authors":"Edyta Puniach, Wojciech Gruszczyński, Paweł Ćwiąkała, Katarzyna Strząbała, Elżbieta Pastucha","doi":"10.3390/rs16183444","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study compared classifiers that differentiate between urbanized and non-urbanized areas based on unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV)-acquired RGB imagery. The tested solutions included numerous vegetation indices (VIs) thresholding and neural networks (NNs). The analysis was conducted for two study areas for which surveys were carried out using different UAVs and cameras. The ground sampling distances for the study areas were 10 mm and 15 mm, respectively. Reference classification was performed manually, obtaining approximately 24 million classified pixels for the first area and approximately 3.8 million for the second. This research study included an analysis of the impact of the season on the threshold values for the tested VIs and the impact of image patch size provided as inputs for the NNs on classification accuracy. The results of the conducted research study indicate a higher classification accuracy using NNs (about 96%) compared with the best of the tested VIs, i.e., Excess Blue (about 87%). Due to the highly imbalanced nature of the used datasets (non-urbanized areas constitute approximately 87% of the total datasets), the Matthews correlation coefficient was also used to assess the correctness of the classification. The analysis based on statistical measures was supplemented with a qualitative assessment of the classification results, which allowed the identification of the most important sources of differences in classification between VIs thresholding and NNs.","PeriodicalId":48993,"journal":{"name":"Remote Sensing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Recognition of Urbanized Areas in UAV-Derived Very-High-Resolution Visible-Light Imagery\",\"authors\":\"Edyta Puniach, Wojciech Gruszczyński, Paweł Ćwiąkała, Katarzyna Strząbała, Elżbieta Pastucha\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/rs16183444\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study compared classifiers that differentiate between urbanized and non-urbanized areas based on unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV)-acquired RGB imagery. The tested solutions included numerous vegetation indices (VIs) thresholding and neural networks (NNs). The analysis was conducted for two study areas for which surveys were carried out using different UAVs and cameras. The ground sampling distances for the study areas were 10 mm and 15 mm, respectively. Reference classification was performed manually, obtaining approximately 24 million classified pixels for the first area and approximately 3.8 million for the second. This research study included an analysis of the impact of the season on the threshold values for the tested VIs and the impact of image patch size provided as inputs for the NNs on classification accuracy. The results of the conducted research study indicate a higher classification accuracy using NNs (about 96%) compared with the best of the tested VIs, i.e., Excess Blue (about 87%). Due to the highly imbalanced nature of the used datasets (non-urbanized areas constitute approximately 87% of the total datasets), the Matthews correlation coefficient was also used to assess the correctness of the classification. The analysis based on statistical measures was supplemented with a qualitative assessment of the classification results, which allowed the identification of the most important sources of differences in classification between VIs thresholding and NNs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48993,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Remote Sensing\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Remote Sensing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16183444\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Remote Sensing","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16183444","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究比较了基于无人机获取的 RGB 图像区分城市化地区和非城市化地区的分类器。测试的解决方案包括多种植被指数(VI)阈值法和神经网络(NN)。分析针对两个研究区域进行,使用了不同的无人机和相机进行勘测。研究区域的地面取样距离分别为 10 毫米和 15 毫米。参考分类以人工方式进行,第一个区域获得约 2 400 万个分类像素,第二个区域获得约 380 万个分类像素。这项研究包括分析季节对测试 VI 的阈值的影响,以及作为 NN 输入的图像片段大小对分类准确性的影响。研究结果表明,与测试的最佳 VI(即 "过度蓝")(约 87%)相比,使用 NN 的分类准确率更高(约 96%)。由于所使用数据集的高度不平衡(非城市化地区约占数据集总数的 87%),马修斯相关系数也被用来评估分类的正确性。对分类结果的定性评估对基于统计测量的分析进行了补充,从而确定了阈值分类法和导航网分类法之间分类差异的最重要来源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Recognition of Urbanized Areas in UAV-Derived Very-High-Resolution Visible-Light Imagery
This study compared classifiers that differentiate between urbanized and non-urbanized areas based on unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV)-acquired RGB imagery. The tested solutions included numerous vegetation indices (VIs) thresholding and neural networks (NNs). The analysis was conducted for two study areas for which surveys were carried out using different UAVs and cameras. The ground sampling distances for the study areas were 10 mm and 15 mm, respectively. Reference classification was performed manually, obtaining approximately 24 million classified pixels for the first area and approximately 3.8 million for the second. This research study included an analysis of the impact of the season on the threshold values for the tested VIs and the impact of image patch size provided as inputs for the NNs on classification accuracy. The results of the conducted research study indicate a higher classification accuracy using NNs (about 96%) compared with the best of the tested VIs, i.e., Excess Blue (about 87%). Due to the highly imbalanced nature of the used datasets (non-urbanized areas constitute approximately 87% of the total datasets), the Matthews correlation coefficient was also used to assess the correctness of the classification. The analysis based on statistical measures was supplemented with a qualitative assessment of the classification results, which allowed the identification of the most important sources of differences in classification between VIs thresholding and NNs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Remote Sensing
Remote Sensing REMOTE SENSING-
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
24.00%
发文量
5435
审稿时长
20.66 days
期刊介绍: Remote Sensing (ISSN 2072-4292) publishes regular research papers, reviews, letters and communications covering all aspects of the remote sensing process, from instrument design and signal processing to the retrieval of geophysical parameters and their application in geosciences. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish experimental, theoretical and computational results in as much detail as possible so that results can be easily reproduced. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced.
期刊最新文献
Mapping Field-Level Maize Yields in Ethiopian Smallholder Systems Using Sentinel-2 Imagery Development of a Background Filtering Algorithm to Improve the Accuracy of Determining Underground Cavities Using Multi-Channel Ground-Penetrating Radar and Deep Learning Enhancing Digital Twins with Human Movement Data: A Comparative Study of Lidar-Based Tracking Methods Development of a UAS-Based Multi-Sensor Deep Learning Model for Predicting Napa Cabbage Fresh Weight and Determining Optimal Harvest Time Mini-Satellite Fucheng 1 SAR: Interferometry to Monitor Mining-Induced Subsidence and Comparative Analysis with Sentinel-1
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1