使用单克隆抗体对听力结果的影响:系统回顾

Priya Arya, Yansy Salmerón, Alexandra E. Quimby, Kevin Wong, Jason A. Brant, Tiffany P. Hwa
{"title":"使用单克隆抗体对听力结果的影响:系统回顾","authors":"Priya Arya, Yansy Salmerón, Alexandra E. Quimby, Kevin Wong, Jason A. Brant, Tiffany P. Hwa","doi":"10.1002/lary.31763","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ObjectiveTo ascertain trends in ototoxicity observed with monoclonal antibodies (mABs) and understand the impact they may have on hearing function.Data SourcesPubMed, Embase, Scopus.Review MethodsA systematic review was performed following PRISMA guidelines. Data were reviewed for demographics, utilized mABs with respective indication and dosing, audiometric outcomes, and treatment for otologic effects.ResultsOf 757 studies reviewed, a total of 44 were included, encompassing 18,046 patients treated with mABs. Mean age of the sample was 57.8 years old. The search yielded 18 agents of ototoxicity, with reported symptoms of ototoxicity such as hearing loss, tinnitus, and/or aural fullness occurring in 1079 of total patients. Main agents causing ototoxicity were teprotumumab (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 17/44 studies), nivolumab (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 10/44), ipilimumab (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 9/44), pembrolizumab (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 5/44), and rituximab (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 4/44). Thirty‐one of 44 studies encompassing eight agents reported audiometric data for ototoxic agents, showing sensorineural hearing loss primarily in the high‐frequency range. Only two articles performed ultrahigh‐frequency audiograms.ConclusionMonoclonal antibody usage is expanding, but the vast majority of studies lack substantial audiometric data. Where reported, study design and inclusion criteria vary greatly. Future studies would benefit from rigid inclusion of audiometric data, prospective study design, and consideration of formal ototoxicity screening. Otolaryngologists should be aware of the cochlear immune response and potential impact of this expanding medication class on hearing function. <jats:italic>Laryngoscope</jats:italic>, 2024","PeriodicalId":501696,"journal":{"name":"The Laryngoscope","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Impact of Monoclonal Antibody Usage on Hearing Outcomes: A Systematic Review\",\"authors\":\"Priya Arya, Yansy Salmerón, Alexandra E. Quimby, Kevin Wong, Jason A. Brant, Tiffany P. Hwa\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/lary.31763\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ObjectiveTo ascertain trends in ototoxicity observed with monoclonal antibodies (mABs) and understand the impact they may have on hearing function.Data SourcesPubMed, Embase, Scopus.Review MethodsA systematic review was performed following PRISMA guidelines. Data were reviewed for demographics, utilized mABs with respective indication and dosing, audiometric outcomes, and treatment for otologic effects.ResultsOf 757 studies reviewed, a total of 44 were included, encompassing 18,046 patients treated with mABs. Mean age of the sample was 57.8 years old. The search yielded 18 agents of ototoxicity, with reported symptoms of ototoxicity such as hearing loss, tinnitus, and/or aural fullness occurring in 1079 of total patients. Main agents causing ototoxicity were teprotumumab (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 17/44 studies), nivolumab (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 10/44), ipilimumab (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 9/44), pembrolizumab (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 5/44), and rituximab (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 4/44). Thirty‐one of 44 studies encompassing eight agents reported audiometric data for ototoxic agents, showing sensorineural hearing loss primarily in the high‐frequency range. Only two articles performed ultrahigh‐frequency audiograms.ConclusionMonoclonal antibody usage is expanding, but the vast majority of studies lack substantial audiometric data. Where reported, study design and inclusion criteria vary greatly. Future studies would benefit from rigid inclusion of audiometric data, prospective study design, and consideration of formal ototoxicity screening. Otolaryngologists should be aware of the cochlear immune response and potential impact of this expanding medication class on hearing function. <jats:italic>Laryngoscope</jats:italic>, 2024\",\"PeriodicalId\":501696,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Laryngoscope\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Laryngoscope\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.31763\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Laryngoscope","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.31763","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

数据来源PubMed、Embase、Scopus.综述方法按照PRISMA指南进行了系统综述。结果 在所回顾的 757 项研究中,共有 44 项被纳入,涉及接受 mABs 治疗的 18,046 名患者。样本的平均年龄为 57.8 岁。搜索结果显示,有18种药物引起了耳毒性,其中1079名患者出现了听力下降、耳鸣和/或耳部饱胀等耳毒性症状。引起耳毒性的主要药物为特普单抗(n = 17/44 项研究)、尼伏单抗(n = 10/44)、伊匹单抗(n = 9/44)、彭博单抗(n = 5/44)和利妥昔单抗(n = 4/44)。44 项研究中有 31 项报告了耳毒性药物的听力数据,其中包括 8 种药物,显示感音神经性听力损失主要出现在高频范围。结论单克隆抗体的使用范围正在扩大,但绝大多数研究缺乏大量听力数据。在已报道的研究中,研究设计和纳入标准差异很大。严格纳入听力数据、前瞻性研究设计和考虑正式的耳毒性筛查将有利于未来的研究。耳鼻喉科医生应了解耳蜗免疫反应以及这一不断扩大的药物类别对听力功能的潜在影响。喉镜,2024 年
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Impact of Monoclonal Antibody Usage on Hearing Outcomes: A Systematic Review
ObjectiveTo ascertain trends in ototoxicity observed with monoclonal antibodies (mABs) and understand the impact they may have on hearing function.Data SourcesPubMed, Embase, Scopus.Review MethodsA systematic review was performed following PRISMA guidelines. Data were reviewed for demographics, utilized mABs with respective indication and dosing, audiometric outcomes, and treatment for otologic effects.ResultsOf 757 studies reviewed, a total of 44 were included, encompassing 18,046 patients treated with mABs. Mean age of the sample was 57.8 years old. The search yielded 18 agents of ototoxicity, with reported symptoms of ototoxicity such as hearing loss, tinnitus, and/or aural fullness occurring in 1079 of total patients. Main agents causing ototoxicity were teprotumumab (n = 17/44 studies), nivolumab (n = 10/44), ipilimumab (n = 9/44), pembrolizumab (n = 5/44), and rituximab (n = 4/44). Thirty‐one of 44 studies encompassing eight agents reported audiometric data for ototoxic agents, showing sensorineural hearing loss primarily in the high‐frequency range. Only two articles performed ultrahigh‐frequency audiograms.ConclusionMonoclonal antibody usage is expanding, but the vast majority of studies lack substantial audiometric data. Where reported, study design and inclusion criteria vary greatly. Future studies would benefit from rigid inclusion of audiometric data, prospective study design, and consideration of formal ototoxicity screening. Otolaryngologists should be aware of the cochlear immune response and potential impact of this expanding medication class on hearing function. Laryngoscope, 2024
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Tonsillectomy Versus Tonsillotomy in Pediatric Sleep-Disordered Breathing: A Systematic Review and Multi-subgroup Meta-analysis. JAK-inhibitor Tofacitinib in Severe Laryngeal Sarcoidosis: A Case Report. The Use of Water Sac Dilation in Resecting Parapharyngeal Space Benign Tumor via Transoral Approach Impact of Biologics on Surgery in Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Polyps and Allergic Fungal Sinusitis High‐Riding Innominate Artery: Booby Trap for ICU Tracheotomy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1