用于评估老年癌症患者术后急性疼痛的日文版 Algoplus® 验证

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING Japan Journal of Nursing Science Pub Date : 2024-09-18 DOI:10.1111/jjns.12623
Masumi Mori, Eri Ikeda, Kimie Fujita
{"title":"用于评估老年癌症患者术后急性疼痛的日文版 Algoplus® 验证","authors":"Masumi Mori, Eri Ikeda, Kimie Fujita","doi":"10.1111/jjns.12623","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AimThis study aimed to validate a Japanese version of the Algoplus® tool by assessing postoperative pain in older Japanese patients with cancer and examining the scale's psychometric properties.MethodsAfter translating Algoplus® into Japanese, we conducted a cross‐sectional study of patients aged 65 years or older who underwent surgery to remove malignant tumors. Two registered nurse‐certified investigators used the Numerical Rating Scale, the Japanese version of Algoplus®, and the Japanese version of the Abbey Pain Scale before and after analgesic use on postoperative days 3 and 5 to evaluate response to pharmacologic therapy. Validity was tested by a correlation analysis between the Japanese version of Algoplus®, two pain scales, and nine hypotheses related to demographic variables and surgical invasions. The Kuder–Richardson‐20 test and Cohen's Kappa coefficient were used for internal consistency and inter‐rater reliability, respectively.ResultsThe total score of the Japanese version of Algoplus® showed strong to moderate correlations with the two pain scales. Demographic characteristics were not associated with the total score of the Japanese version, but significant correlations with operative time and postoperative analgesia administration existed. The scale demonstrated good internal consistency (Kuder–Richardson‐20 <jats:italic>α</jats:italic>: .70) and inter‐rater reliability (Kappa coefficient .72). The total score of the Japanese version decreased significantly after analgesic use in both postoperative assessments.ConclusionsThe Japanese version of Algoplus® is a reliable and valid instrument for nurses to easily assess acute postoperative pain in older Japanese patients with cancer and shows good responsiveness for detecting the change in pain status.","PeriodicalId":50265,"journal":{"name":"Japan Journal of Nursing Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of the Japanese version of Algoplus® for the assessment of acute postoperative pain in older patients with cancer\",\"authors\":\"Masumi Mori, Eri Ikeda, Kimie Fujita\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jjns.12623\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"AimThis study aimed to validate a Japanese version of the Algoplus® tool by assessing postoperative pain in older Japanese patients with cancer and examining the scale's psychometric properties.MethodsAfter translating Algoplus® into Japanese, we conducted a cross‐sectional study of patients aged 65 years or older who underwent surgery to remove malignant tumors. Two registered nurse‐certified investigators used the Numerical Rating Scale, the Japanese version of Algoplus®, and the Japanese version of the Abbey Pain Scale before and after analgesic use on postoperative days 3 and 5 to evaluate response to pharmacologic therapy. Validity was tested by a correlation analysis between the Japanese version of Algoplus®, two pain scales, and nine hypotheses related to demographic variables and surgical invasions. The Kuder–Richardson‐20 test and Cohen's Kappa coefficient were used for internal consistency and inter‐rater reliability, respectively.ResultsThe total score of the Japanese version of Algoplus® showed strong to moderate correlations with the two pain scales. Demographic characteristics were not associated with the total score of the Japanese version, but significant correlations with operative time and postoperative analgesia administration existed. The scale demonstrated good internal consistency (Kuder–Richardson‐20 <jats:italic>α</jats:italic>: .70) and inter‐rater reliability (Kappa coefficient .72). The total score of the Japanese version decreased significantly after analgesic use in both postoperative assessments.ConclusionsThe Japanese version of Algoplus® is a reliable and valid instrument for nurses to easily assess acute postoperative pain in older Japanese patients with cancer and shows good responsiveness for detecting the change in pain status.\",\"PeriodicalId\":50265,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Japan Journal of Nursing Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Japan Journal of Nursing Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jjns.12623\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japan Journal of Nursing Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jjns.12623","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

方法在将 Algoplus® 翻译成日语后,我们对 65 岁或以上接受恶性肿瘤切除手术的患者进行了横断面研究。两名注册护士认证调查员在术后第 3 天和第 5 天使用镇痛剂前后使用了数字评分量表、日文版 Algoplus® 和日文版阿贝疼痛量表,以评估对药物治疗的反应。通过对日文版 Algoplus®、两种疼痛量表以及与人口统计学变量和手术创口相关的九项假设进行相关性分析,对有效性进行了检验。Kuder-Richardson-20测试和Cohen's Kappa系数分别用于检测内部一致性和评分者之间的可靠性。人口统计学特征与日语版总分无关,但与手术时间和术后镇痛用药存在显著相关性。该量表具有良好的内部一致性(Kuder-Richardson-20 α:.70)和评分者之间的可靠性(Kappa系数.72)。结论日文版 Algoplus® 是一种可靠有效的工具,护士可以轻松评估日本老年癌症患者的急性术后疼痛,并能很好地检测疼痛状态的变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Validation of the Japanese version of Algoplus® for the assessment of acute postoperative pain in older patients with cancer
AimThis study aimed to validate a Japanese version of the Algoplus® tool by assessing postoperative pain in older Japanese patients with cancer and examining the scale's psychometric properties.MethodsAfter translating Algoplus® into Japanese, we conducted a cross‐sectional study of patients aged 65 years or older who underwent surgery to remove malignant tumors. Two registered nurse‐certified investigators used the Numerical Rating Scale, the Japanese version of Algoplus®, and the Japanese version of the Abbey Pain Scale before and after analgesic use on postoperative days 3 and 5 to evaluate response to pharmacologic therapy. Validity was tested by a correlation analysis between the Japanese version of Algoplus®, two pain scales, and nine hypotheses related to demographic variables and surgical invasions. The Kuder–Richardson‐20 test and Cohen's Kappa coefficient were used for internal consistency and inter‐rater reliability, respectively.ResultsThe total score of the Japanese version of Algoplus® showed strong to moderate correlations with the two pain scales. Demographic characteristics were not associated with the total score of the Japanese version, but significant correlations with operative time and postoperative analgesia administration existed. The scale demonstrated good internal consistency (Kuder–Richardson‐20 α: .70) and inter‐rater reliability (Kappa coefficient .72). The total score of the Japanese version decreased significantly after analgesic use in both postoperative assessments.ConclusionsThe Japanese version of Algoplus® is a reliable and valid instrument for nurses to easily assess acute postoperative pain in older Japanese patients with cancer and shows good responsiveness for detecting the change in pain status.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
55
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Japan Journal of Nursing Science is the official English language journal of the Japan Academy of Nursing Science. The purpose of the Journal is to provide a mechanism to share knowledge related to improving health care and promoting the development of nursing. The Journal seeks original manuscripts reporting scholarly work on the art and science of nursing. Original articles may be empirical and qualitative studies, review articles, methodological articles, brief reports, case studies and letters to the Editor. Please see Instructions for Authors for detailed authorship qualification requirement.
期刊最新文献
Effect of positive psychological capital on burnout in public hospital nurses: Mediating effect of compassion fatigue is greater than compassion satisfaction Validation of the Japanese version of Algoplus® for the assessment of acute postoperative pain in older patients with cancer Barriers and facilitators to bridging the healthcare digital divide for the older adults: A qualitative research from patients in China Organizational factors associated with less use of restraints in older adults with dementia in acute care hospitals: A scoping review Effects of hand-bathing on noise-induced vasoconstriction: A randomized controlled trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1