Justin Philip Tuazon, Gia Mizrane Abubo, Joemari Olea
{"title":"因子模型的可解释性指数和软约束","authors":"Justin Philip Tuazon, Gia Mizrane Abubo, Joemari Olea","doi":"arxiv-2409.11525","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Factor analysis is a way to characterize the relationships between many\n(observable) variables in terms of a smaller number of unobservable random\nvariables which are called factors. However, the application of factor models\nand its success can be subjective or difficult to gauge, since infinitely many\nfactor models that produce the same correlation matrix can be fit given sample\ndata. Thus, there is a need to operationalize a criterion that measures how\nmeaningful or \"interpretable\" a factor model is in order to select the best\namong many factor models. While there are already techniques that aim to measure and enhance\ninterpretability, new indices, as well as rotation methods via mathematical\noptimization based on them, are proposed to measure interpretability. The\nproposed methods directly incorporate semantics with the help of natural\nlanguage processing and are generalized to incorporate any \"prior information\".\nMoreover, the indices allow for complete or partial specification of\nrelationships at a pairwise level. Aside from these, two other main benefits of\nthe proposed methods are that they do not require the estimation of factor\nscores, which avoids the factor score indeterminacy problem, and that no\nadditional explanatory variables are necessary. The implementation of the proposed methods is written in Python 3 and is made\navailable together with several helper functions through the package\ninterpretablefa on the Python Package Index. The methods' application is\ndemonstrated here using data on the Experiences in Close Relationships Scale,\nobtained from the Open-Source Psychometrics Project.","PeriodicalId":501425,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - STAT - Methodology","volume":"104 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interpretability Indices and Soft Constraints for Factor Models\",\"authors\":\"Justin Philip Tuazon, Gia Mizrane Abubo, Joemari Olea\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2409.11525\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Factor analysis is a way to characterize the relationships between many\\n(observable) variables in terms of a smaller number of unobservable random\\nvariables which are called factors. However, the application of factor models\\nand its success can be subjective or difficult to gauge, since infinitely many\\nfactor models that produce the same correlation matrix can be fit given sample\\ndata. Thus, there is a need to operationalize a criterion that measures how\\nmeaningful or \\\"interpretable\\\" a factor model is in order to select the best\\namong many factor models. While there are already techniques that aim to measure and enhance\\ninterpretability, new indices, as well as rotation methods via mathematical\\noptimization based on them, are proposed to measure interpretability. The\\nproposed methods directly incorporate semantics with the help of natural\\nlanguage processing and are generalized to incorporate any \\\"prior information\\\".\\nMoreover, the indices allow for complete or partial specification of\\nrelationships at a pairwise level. Aside from these, two other main benefits of\\nthe proposed methods are that they do not require the estimation of factor\\nscores, which avoids the factor score indeterminacy problem, and that no\\nadditional explanatory variables are necessary. The implementation of the proposed methods is written in Python 3 and is made\\navailable together with several helper functions through the package\\ninterpretablefa on the Python Package Index. The methods' application is\\ndemonstrated here using data on the Experiences in Close Relationships Scale,\\nobtained from the Open-Source Psychometrics Project.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501425,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - STAT - Methodology\",\"volume\":\"104 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - STAT - Methodology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.11525\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - STAT - Methodology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.11525","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
因子分析是用较少数量的不可观测随机变量来描述许多(可观测)变量之间关系的一种方法,这些变量被称为因子。然而,因子模型的应用及其成功与否可能是主观的或难以衡量的,因为在给定的抽样数据中,可以拟合出产生相同相关矩阵的无限多个因子模型。因此,需要有一个可操作的标准来衡量因子模型的意义或 "可解释性",以便在众多因子模型中选出最佳模型。虽然目前已经有了一些旨在测量和增强可解释性的技术,但我们还是提出了一些新的指数以及基于这些指数的数学优化旋转方法来测量可解释性。所提出的方法借助自然语言处理技术直接将语义纳入其中,并将其推广到任何 "先验信息 "中。此外,这些指数允许在成对水平上对关系进行完整或部分说明。除此之外,所提方法还有两个主要优点,一是不需要估计因子分数,从而避免了因子分数不确定的问题,二是不需要额外的解释变量。所提方法的实现是用 Python 3 编写的,并通过 Python 软件包索引中的软件包interpretablefa 与几个辅助函数一起提供。本文使用从开源心理测量项目(Open-Source Psychometrics Project)获得的亲密关系体验量表(Experiences in Close Relationships Scale)数据来演示这些方法的应用。
Interpretability Indices and Soft Constraints for Factor Models
Factor analysis is a way to characterize the relationships between many
(observable) variables in terms of a smaller number of unobservable random
variables which are called factors. However, the application of factor models
and its success can be subjective or difficult to gauge, since infinitely many
factor models that produce the same correlation matrix can be fit given sample
data. Thus, there is a need to operationalize a criterion that measures how
meaningful or "interpretable" a factor model is in order to select the best
among many factor models. While there are already techniques that aim to measure and enhance
interpretability, new indices, as well as rotation methods via mathematical
optimization based on them, are proposed to measure interpretability. The
proposed methods directly incorporate semantics with the help of natural
language processing and are generalized to incorporate any "prior information".
Moreover, the indices allow for complete or partial specification of
relationships at a pairwise level. Aside from these, two other main benefits of
the proposed methods are that they do not require the estimation of factor
scores, which avoids the factor score indeterminacy problem, and that no
additional explanatory variables are necessary. The implementation of the proposed methods is written in Python 3 and is made
available together with several helper functions through the package
interpretablefa on the Python Package Index. The methods' application is
demonstrated here using data on the Experiences in Close Relationships Scale,
obtained from the Open-Source Psychometrics Project.