因子模型的可解释性指数和软约束

Justin Philip Tuazon, Gia Mizrane Abubo, Joemari Olea
{"title":"因子模型的可解释性指数和软约束","authors":"Justin Philip Tuazon, Gia Mizrane Abubo, Joemari Olea","doi":"arxiv-2409.11525","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Factor analysis is a way to characterize the relationships between many\n(observable) variables in terms of a smaller number of unobservable random\nvariables which are called factors. However, the application of factor models\nand its success can be subjective or difficult to gauge, since infinitely many\nfactor models that produce the same correlation matrix can be fit given sample\ndata. Thus, there is a need to operationalize a criterion that measures how\nmeaningful or \"interpretable\" a factor model is in order to select the best\namong many factor models. While there are already techniques that aim to measure and enhance\ninterpretability, new indices, as well as rotation methods via mathematical\noptimization based on them, are proposed to measure interpretability. The\nproposed methods directly incorporate semantics with the help of natural\nlanguage processing and are generalized to incorporate any \"prior information\".\nMoreover, the indices allow for complete or partial specification of\nrelationships at a pairwise level. Aside from these, two other main benefits of\nthe proposed methods are that they do not require the estimation of factor\nscores, which avoids the factor score indeterminacy problem, and that no\nadditional explanatory variables are necessary. The implementation of the proposed methods is written in Python 3 and is made\navailable together with several helper functions through the package\ninterpretablefa on the Python Package Index. The methods' application is\ndemonstrated here using data on the Experiences in Close Relationships Scale,\nobtained from the Open-Source Psychometrics Project.","PeriodicalId":501425,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - STAT - Methodology","volume":"104 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interpretability Indices and Soft Constraints for Factor Models\",\"authors\":\"Justin Philip Tuazon, Gia Mizrane Abubo, Joemari Olea\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2409.11525\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Factor analysis is a way to characterize the relationships between many\\n(observable) variables in terms of a smaller number of unobservable random\\nvariables which are called factors. However, the application of factor models\\nand its success can be subjective or difficult to gauge, since infinitely many\\nfactor models that produce the same correlation matrix can be fit given sample\\ndata. Thus, there is a need to operationalize a criterion that measures how\\nmeaningful or \\\"interpretable\\\" a factor model is in order to select the best\\namong many factor models. While there are already techniques that aim to measure and enhance\\ninterpretability, new indices, as well as rotation methods via mathematical\\noptimization based on them, are proposed to measure interpretability. The\\nproposed methods directly incorporate semantics with the help of natural\\nlanguage processing and are generalized to incorporate any \\\"prior information\\\".\\nMoreover, the indices allow for complete or partial specification of\\nrelationships at a pairwise level. Aside from these, two other main benefits of\\nthe proposed methods are that they do not require the estimation of factor\\nscores, which avoids the factor score indeterminacy problem, and that no\\nadditional explanatory variables are necessary. The implementation of the proposed methods is written in Python 3 and is made\\navailable together with several helper functions through the package\\ninterpretablefa on the Python Package Index. The methods' application is\\ndemonstrated here using data on the Experiences in Close Relationships Scale,\\nobtained from the Open-Source Psychometrics Project.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501425,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - STAT - Methodology\",\"volume\":\"104 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - STAT - Methodology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.11525\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - STAT - Methodology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.11525","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

因子分析是用较少数量的不可观测随机变量来描述许多(可观测)变量之间关系的一种方法,这些变量被称为因子。然而,因子模型的应用及其成功与否可能是主观的或难以衡量的,因为在给定的抽样数据中,可以拟合出产生相同相关矩阵的无限多个因子模型。因此,需要有一个可操作的标准来衡量因子模型的意义或 "可解释性",以便在众多因子模型中选出最佳模型。虽然目前已经有了一些旨在测量和增强可解释性的技术,但我们还是提出了一些新的指数以及基于这些指数的数学优化旋转方法来测量可解释性。所提出的方法借助自然语言处理技术直接将语义纳入其中,并将其推广到任何 "先验信息 "中。此外,这些指数允许在成对水平上对关系进行完整或部分说明。除此之外,所提方法还有两个主要优点,一是不需要估计因子分数,从而避免了因子分数不确定的问题,二是不需要额外的解释变量。所提方法的实现是用 Python 3 编写的,并通过 Python 软件包索引中的软件包interpretablefa 与几个辅助函数一起提供。本文使用从开源心理测量项目(Open-Source Psychometrics Project)获得的亲密关系体验量表(Experiences in Close Relationships Scale)数据来演示这些方法的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Interpretability Indices and Soft Constraints for Factor Models
Factor analysis is a way to characterize the relationships between many (observable) variables in terms of a smaller number of unobservable random variables which are called factors. However, the application of factor models and its success can be subjective or difficult to gauge, since infinitely many factor models that produce the same correlation matrix can be fit given sample data. Thus, there is a need to operationalize a criterion that measures how meaningful or "interpretable" a factor model is in order to select the best among many factor models. While there are already techniques that aim to measure and enhance interpretability, new indices, as well as rotation methods via mathematical optimization based on them, are proposed to measure interpretability. The proposed methods directly incorporate semantics with the help of natural language processing and are generalized to incorporate any "prior information". Moreover, the indices allow for complete or partial specification of relationships at a pairwise level. Aside from these, two other main benefits of the proposed methods are that they do not require the estimation of factor scores, which avoids the factor score indeterminacy problem, and that no additional explanatory variables are necessary. The implementation of the proposed methods is written in Python 3 and is made available together with several helper functions through the package interpretablefa on the Python Package Index. The methods' application is demonstrated here using data on the Experiences in Close Relationships Scale, obtained from the Open-Source Psychometrics Project.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Poisson approximate likelihood compared to the particle filter Optimising the Trade-Off Between Type I and Type II Errors: A Review and Extensions Bias Reduction in Matched Observational Studies with Continuous Treatments: Calipered Non-Bipartite Matching and Bias-Corrected Estimation and Inference Forecasting age distribution of life-table death counts via α-transformation Probability-scale residuals for event-time data
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1