在低容量中心进行有效、安全的机械式经静脉导联取出术

IF 2.5 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Heart Rhythm O2 Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.hroo.2024.07.015
Lin Li MD , Anna Busija MD, PhD , Han Feng PhD , Amitabh C. Pandey MD , Thierry Le Jemtel MD , Bassam G. Wanna MD
{"title":"在低容量中心进行有效、安全的机械式经静脉导联取出术","authors":"Lin Li MD ,&nbsp;Anna Busija MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Han Feng PhD ,&nbsp;Amitabh C. Pandey MD ,&nbsp;Thierry Le Jemtel MD ,&nbsp;Bassam G. Wanna MD","doi":"10.1016/j.hroo.2024.07.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Transvenous lead extraction (TLE) of cardiac implantable electronic devices was once deemed highly risky by high-volume centers. However, advancements in technology have significantly reduced the risk, making TLE a safer procedure in electrophysiology.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The purpose of this study was to examine the efficacy and safety of mechanical TLEs in a low-volume center with a single operator.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This study retrospectively accessed electronic medical records from the Tulane University School of Medicine system in New Orleans, Louisiana, and included patients who received mechanical TLE from 2016 to 2023. We analyzed the indications for TLE, patient characteristics, lead characteristics, success rate, and complications.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We included 149 consecutive mechanical TLEs with an average implant duration of 105 months. A total of 53.7% (80) of TLEs were indicated for infectious reasons, and 37.6% (56) were high-voltage leads. Clinical success and complete procedural success rates were both 94.6% with no procedure-related mortality or major complications. The periprocedural mortality rate was 1.25% (1). Minor complications included a left chest pocket hematoma, a left groin hematoma, and urinary retention.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The efficacy and safety of mechanical TLEs performed in a low-volume center are comparable with those in high-volume centers.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":29772,"journal":{"name":"Heart Rhythm O2","volume":"5 9","pages":"Pages 639-643"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666501824002551/pdfft?md5=57482ff4bec85f7213cb9c46be6e46c1&pid=1-s2.0-S2666501824002551-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effective and safe mechanical transvenous lead extraction in a low-volume center\",\"authors\":\"Lin Li MD ,&nbsp;Anna Busija MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Han Feng PhD ,&nbsp;Amitabh C. Pandey MD ,&nbsp;Thierry Le Jemtel MD ,&nbsp;Bassam G. Wanna MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.hroo.2024.07.015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Transvenous lead extraction (TLE) of cardiac implantable electronic devices was once deemed highly risky by high-volume centers. However, advancements in technology have significantly reduced the risk, making TLE a safer procedure in electrophysiology.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The purpose of this study was to examine the efficacy and safety of mechanical TLEs in a low-volume center with a single operator.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This study retrospectively accessed electronic medical records from the Tulane University School of Medicine system in New Orleans, Louisiana, and included patients who received mechanical TLE from 2016 to 2023. We analyzed the indications for TLE, patient characteristics, lead characteristics, success rate, and complications.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We included 149 consecutive mechanical TLEs with an average implant duration of 105 months. A total of 53.7% (80) of TLEs were indicated for infectious reasons, and 37.6% (56) were high-voltage leads. Clinical success and complete procedural success rates were both 94.6% with no procedure-related mortality or major complications. The periprocedural mortality rate was 1.25% (1). Minor complications included a left chest pocket hematoma, a left groin hematoma, and urinary retention.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The efficacy and safety of mechanical TLEs performed in a low-volume center are comparable with those in high-volume centers.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":29772,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Heart Rhythm O2\",\"volume\":\"5 9\",\"pages\":\"Pages 639-643\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666501824002551/pdfft?md5=57482ff4bec85f7213cb9c46be6e46c1&pid=1-s2.0-S2666501824002551-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Heart Rhythm O2\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666501824002551\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart Rhythm O2","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666501824002551","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景心脏植入式电子设备的经静脉导联取出术(TLE)曾一度被高容量中心视为高风险手术。然而,技术的进步大大降低了风险,使 TLE 成为电生理学中更安全的手术。本研究的目的是在一个低容量中心,由一名操作者进行机械 TLE 的有效性和安全性。我们分析了TLE的适应症、患者特征、导联特征、成功率和并发症。结果我们纳入了149例连续的机械TLE,平均植入时间为105个月。53.7%(80 例)的 TLE 是由于感染原因,37.6%(56 例)是高压导联。临床成功率和完全手术成功率均为 94.6%,无手术相关死亡率或重大并发症。围手术期死亡率为 1.25% (1)。轻微并发症包括左胸袋血肿、左腹股沟血肿和尿潴留。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effective and safe mechanical transvenous lead extraction in a low-volume center

Background

Transvenous lead extraction (TLE) of cardiac implantable electronic devices was once deemed highly risky by high-volume centers. However, advancements in technology have significantly reduced the risk, making TLE a safer procedure in electrophysiology.

Objective

The purpose of this study was to examine the efficacy and safety of mechanical TLEs in a low-volume center with a single operator.

Methods

This study retrospectively accessed electronic medical records from the Tulane University School of Medicine system in New Orleans, Louisiana, and included patients who received mechanical TLE from 2016 to 2023. We analyzed the indications for TLE, patient characteristics, lead characteristics, success rate, and complications.

Results

We included 149 consecutive mechanical TLEs with an average implant duration of 105 months. A total of 53.7% (80) of TLEs were indicated for infectious reasons, and 37.6% (56) were high-voltage leads. Clinical success and complete procedural success rates were both 94.6% with no procedure-related mortality or major complications. The periprocedural mortality rate was 1.25% (1). Minor complications included a left chest pocket hematoma, a left groin hematoma, and urinary retention.

Conclusion

The efficacy and safety of mechanical TLEs performed in a low-volume center are comparable with those in high-volume centers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Heart Rhythm O2
Heart Rhythm O2 Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
52 days
期刊最新文献
Global voices on atrial fibrillation: South/Southeast Asia Global voices on atrial fibrillation management: Brazil Ethanol infusion into the vein of Marshall reduced atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence during catheter ablation: A systematic review and meta-analysis The global burden of atrial fibrillation: Voices from Asia and Brazil Ventricular stimulation in patients with myotonic dystrophy type 1 may not predict future ventricular arrhythmias
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1