以实验和临床数据为验证证据,建立 TAVI 患者特定模拟的可信度

IF 7 2区 医学 Q1 BIOLOGY Computers in biology and medicine Pub Date : 2024-09-19 DOI:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2024.109159
{"title":"以实验和临床数据为验证证据,建立 TAVI 患者特定模拟的可信度","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.compbiomed.2024.109159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>The objective of this study is to validate a novel workflow for implementing patient-specific finite element (FE) simulations to virtually replicate the Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) procedure.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Seven patients undergoing TAVI were enrolled. Patient-specific anatomical models were reconstructed from pre-operative computed tomography (CT) scans and subsequentially discretized, considering the native aortic leaflets and calcifications. Moreover, high-fidelity models of CoreValve Evolut R and Acurate Neo2 valves were built. To determine the most suitable material properties for the two stents, an accurate calibration process was undertaken. This involved conducting crimping simulations and fine-tuning Nitinol parameters to fit experimental force-diameter curves. Subsequently, FE simulations of TAVI procedures were conducted. To validate the reliability of the implemented implantation simulations, qualitative and quantitative comparisons with post-operative clinical data, such as angiographies and CT scans, were performed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>For both devices, the simulation curves closely matched the experimental data, indicating successful validation of the valves mechanical behaviour. An accurate qualitative superimposition with both angiographies and CTs was evident, proving the reliability of the simulated implantation. Furthermore, a mean percentage difference of 1,79 ± 0,93 % and 3,67 ± 2,73 % between the simulated and segmented final configurations of the stents was calculated in terms of orifice area and eccentricity, respectively.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This study shows the successful validation of TAVI simulations in patient-specific anatomies, offering a valuable tool to optimize patients care through personalized pre-operative planning. A systematic approach for the validation is presented, laying the groundwork for enhanced predictive modeling in clinical practice.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10578,"journal":{"name":"Computers in biology and medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010482524012447/pdfft?md5=2b6ff3463cebfb54aaa5cf9fa9c6a955&pid=1-s2.0-S0010482524012447-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation evidence with experimental and clinical data to establish credibility of TAVI patient-specific simulations\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.compbiomed.2024.109159\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>The objective of this study is to validate a novel workflow for implementing patient-specific finite element (FE) simulations to virtually replicate the Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) procedure.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Seven patients undergoing TAVI were enrolled. Patient-specific anatomical models were reconstructed from pre-operative computed tomography (CT) scans and subsequentially discretized, considering the native aortic leaflets and calcifications. Moreover, high-fidelity models of CoreValve Evolut R and Acurate Neo2 valves were built. To determine the most suitable material properties for the two stents, an accurate calibration process was undertaken. This involved conducting crimping simulations and fine-tuning Nitinol parameters to fit experimental force-diameter curves. Subsequently, FE simulations of TAVI procedures were conducted. To validate the reliability of the implemented implantation simulations, qualitative and quantitative comparisons with post-operative clinical data, such as angiographies and CT scans, were performed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>For both devices, the simulation curves closely matched the experimental data, indicating successful validation of the valves mechanical behaviour. An accurate qualitative superimposition with both angiographies and CTs was evident, proving the reliability of the simulated implantation. Furthermore, a mean percentage difference of 1,79 ± 0,93 % and 3,67 ± 2,73 % between the simulated and segmented final configurations of the stents was calculated in terms of orifice area and eccentricity, respectively.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This study shows the successful validation of TAVI simulations in patient-specific anatomies, offering a valuable tool to optimize patients care through personalized pre-operative planning. A systematic approach for the validation is presented, laying the groundwork for enhanced predictive modeling in clinical practice.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10578,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computers in biology and medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010482524012447/pdfft?md5=2b6ff3463cebfb54aaa5cf9fa9c6a955&pid=1-s2.0-S0010482524012447-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computers in biology and medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010482524012447\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers in biology and medicine","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010482524012447","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的 本研究旨在验证一种新的工作流程,该流程用于实施患者特异性有限元(FE)模拟,以虚拟复制经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)过程。根据术前计算机断层扫描(CT)重建了患者特定的解剖模型,并在考虑原生主动脉瓣叶和钙化的基础上进行了离散化处理。此外,还建立了 CoreValve Evolut R 和 Acurate Neo2 瓣膜的高保真模型。为了确定两种支架最合适的材料特性,进行了精确的校准过程。这包括进行卷曲模拟和微调镍钛诺参数,以适应实验力-直径曲线。随后,进行了 TAVI 手术的 FE 模拟。为了验证所实施的植入模拟的可靠性,还与血管造影和 CT 扫描等术后临床数据进行了定性和定量比较。与血管造影和 CT 扫描的精确定性叠加非常明显,证明了模拟植入的可靠性。此外,模拟和分段支架最终配置在孔口面积和偏心率方面的平均百分比差异分别为 1,79 ± 0,93 % 和 3,67 ± 2,73 %。该研究提出了一种系统的验证方法,为在临床实践中加强预测建模奠定了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Validation evidence with experimental and clinical data to establish credibility of TAVI patient-specific simulations

Purpose

The objective of this study is to validate a novel workflow for implementing patient-specific finite element (FE) simulations to virtually replicate the Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) procedure.

Methods

Seven patients undergoing TAVI were enrolled. Patient-specific anatomical models were reconstructed from pre-operative computed tomography (CT) scans and subsequentially discretized, considering the native aortic leaflets and calcifications. Moreover, high-fidelity models of CoreValve Evolut R and Acurate Neo2 valves were built. To determine the most suitable material properties for the two stents, an accurate calibration process was undertaken. This involved conducting crimping simulations and fine-tuning Nitinol parameters to fit experimental force-diameter curves. Subsequently, FE simulations of TAVI procedures were conducted. To validate the reliability of the implemented implantation simulations, qualitative and quantitative comparisons with post-operative clinical data, such as angiographies and CT scans, were performed.

Results

For both devices, the simulation curves closely matched the experimental data, indicating successful validation of the valves mechanical behaviour. An accurate qualitative superimposition with both angiographies and CTs was evident, proving the reliability of the simulated implantation. Furthermore, a mean percentage difference of 1,79 ± 0,93 % and 3,67 ± 2,73 % between the simulated and segmented final configurations of the stents was calculated in terms of orifice area and eccentricity, respectively.

Conclusion

This study shows the successful validation of TAVI simulations in patient-specific anatomies, offering a valuable tool to optimize patients care through personalized pre-operative planning. A systematic approach for the validation is presented, laying the groundwork for enhanced predictive modeling in clinical practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Computers in biology and medicine
Computers in biology and medicine 工程技术-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
10.40%
发文量
1086
审稿时长
74 days
期刊介绍: Computers in Biology and Medicine is an international forum for sharing groundbreaking advancements in the use of computers in bioscience and medicine. This journal serves as a medium for communicating essential research, instruction, ideas, and information regarding the rapidly evolving field of computer applications in these domains. By encouraging the exchange of knowledge, we aim to facilitate progress and innovation in the utilization of computers in biology and medicine.
期刊最新文献
Lightweight medical image segmentation network with multi-scale feature-guided fusion. Shuffled ECA-Net for stress detection from multimodal wearable sensor data. Stacking based ensemble learning framework for identification of nitrotyrosine sites. Two-stage deep learning framework for occlusal crown depth image generation. A joint analysis proposal of nonlinear longitudinal and time-to-event right-, interval-censored data for modeling pregnancy miscarriage.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1