院外心脏骤停患者进行体外心肺复苏 (ECPR) 的结果、是否符合纳入标准以及成本:回顾性队列研究

IF 2.1 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Resuscitation plus Pub Date : 2024-09-21 DOI:10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100771
Dennis De Blick , Bert Peeters , Philip Verdonck , Erwin Snijders , Karen Peeters , Inez Rodrigus , Jan Coveliers , Rudi De Paep , Philippe G. Jorens , Hein Heidbuchel , Gerdy Debeuckelaere , Koenraad G. Monsieurs
{"title":"院外心脏骤停患者进行体外心肺复苏 (ECPR) 的结果、是否符合纳入标准以及成本:回顾性队列研究","authors":"Dennis De Blick ,&nbsp;Bert Peeters ,&nbsp;Philip Verdonck ,&nbsp;Erwin Snijders ,&nbsp;Karen Peeters ,&nbsp;Inez Rodrigus ,&nbsp;Jan Coveliers ,&nbsp;Rudi De Paep ,&nbsp;Philippe G. Jorens ,&nbsp;Hein Heidbuchel ,&nbsp;Gerdy Debeuckelaere ,&nbsp;Koenraad G. Monsieurs","doi":"10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100771","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The primary aim was to describe the outcome, the compliance with inclusion criteria and the characteristics of patients who underwent extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). The secondary aim was to calculate the cost of ECPR for the patients and the public Belgian healthcare system.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Single-centre retrospective cohort study in Antwerp University Hospital. We included all patients who underwent ECPR for OHCA from 2018 to 2020. Medical records were assessed to determine the clinical outcome and invoices were assessed to calculate the charged fees. We collected all relevant cost components at the most detailed level (micro costing technique).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Sixty-five patients who received ECPR for OHCA were included. Thirty-eight patients (58%) died within one week after ECPR initiation. After one year, twelve patients (18.5%) were still alive of which ten (15.4%) had a good neurological outcome (Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) 1 or 2). Forty-nine patients (75.4%) met the ECPR inclusion criteria. A total of 2,552,498.34 euro was charged. The patients and the public Belgian healthcare system contributed to a 255,250 euro cost for each survivor after one year with good neurological outcome.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Our analysis highlights the complex interplay between clinical efficacy and financial implications in the utilization of ECPR. While ECPR demonstrates potential in improving survival rates and neurological outcomes among cardiac arrest patients, its adoption presents substantial economic challenges. Inappropriate patient selection may lead to significant increases in resource utilisation without improved outcome.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":94192,"journal":{"name":"Resuscitation plus","volume":"20 ","pages":"Article 100771"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666520424002224/pdfft?md5=adda16b0325b5a5fde86f13da70fcb39&pid=1-s2.0-S2666520424002224-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcome, compliance with inclusion criteria and cost of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A retrospective cohort study\",\"authors\":\"Dennis De Blick ,&nbsp;Bert Peeters ,&nbsp;Philip Verdonck ,&nbsp;Erwin Snijders ,&nbsp;Karen Peeters ,&nbsp;Inez Rodrigus ,&nbsp;Jan Coveliers ,&nbsp;Rudi De Paep ,&nbsp;Philippe G. Jorens ,&nbsp;Hein Heidbuchel ,&nbsp;Gerdy Debeuckelaere ,&nbsp;Koenraad G. Monsieurs\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100771\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The primary aim was to describe the outcome, the compliance with inclusion criteria and the characteristics of patients who underwent extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). The secondary aim was to calculate the cost of ECPR for the patients and the public Belgian healthcare system.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Single-centre retrospective cohort study in Antwerp University Hospital. We included all patients who underwent ECPR for OHCA from 2018 to 2020. Medical records were assessed to determine the clinical outcome and invoices were assessed to calculate the charged fees. We collected all relevant cost components at the most detailed level (micro costing technique).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Sixty-five patients who received ECPR for OHCA were included. Thirty-eight patients (58%) died within one week after ECPR initiation. After one year, twelve patients (18.5%) were still alive of which ten (15.4%) had a good neurological outcome (Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) 1 or 2). Forty-nine patients (75.4%) met the ECPR inclusion criteria. A total of 2,552,498.34 euro was charged. The patients and the public Belgian healthcare system contributed to a 255,250 euro cost for each survivor after one year with good neurological outcome.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Our analysis highlights the complex interplay between clinical efficacy and financial implications in the utilization of ECPR. While ECPR demonstrates potential in improving survival rates and neurological outcomes among cardiac arrest patients, its adoption presents substantial economic challenges. Inappropriate patient selection may lead to significant increases in resource utilisation without improved outcome.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94192,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Resuscitation plus\",\"volume\":\"20 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100771\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666520424002224/pdfft?md5=adda16b0325b5a5fde86f13da70fcb39&pid=1-s2.0-S2666520424002224-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Resuscitation plus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666520424002224\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resuscitation plus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666520424002224","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:研究的主要目的是描述因院外心脏骤停(OHCA)而接受体外心肺复苏(ECPR)的患者的治疗效果、是否符合纳入标准以及患者的特征。次要目的是计算 ECPR 对患者和比利时公共医疗系统的成本。我们纳入了 2018 年至 2020 年期间因 OHCA 而接受 ECPR 的所有患者。评估医疗记录以确定临床结果,评估发票以计算收费。我们在最详细的层面上收集了所有相关的成本构成(微观成本计算技术)。结果纳入了65名因OHCA接受ECPR的患者。38 名患者(58%)在 ECPR 启动后一周内死亡。一年后,12 名患者(18.5%)仍然存活,其中 10 名患者(15.4%)的神经功能状况良好(脑功能 1 级或 2 级)。49名患者(75.4%)符合ECPR纳入标准。共花费 2,552,498.34 欧元。患者和比利时公共医疗系统为每位一年后神经功能恢复良好的幸存者支付了 255,250 欧元的费用。虽然 ECPR 在改善心脏骤停患者的存活率和神经功能预后方面具有潜力,但其应用也带来了巨大的经济挑战。不恰当的患者选择可能会导致资源利用率显著增加,而治疗效果却得不到改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Outcome, compliance with inclusion criteria and cost of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A retrospective cohort study

Introduction

The primary aim was to describe the outcome, the compliance with inclusion criteria and the characteristics of patients who underwent extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). The secondary aim was to calculate the cost of ECPR for the patients and the public Belgian healthcare system.

Methods

Single-centre retrospective cohort study in Antwerp University Hospital. We included all patients who underwent ECPR for OHCA from 2018 to 2020. Medical records were assessed to determine the clinical outcome and invoices were assessed to calculate the charged fees. We collected all relevant cost components at the most detailed level (micro costing technique).

Results

Sixty-five patients who received ECPR for OHCA were included. Thirty-eight patients (58%) died within one week after ECPR initiation. After one year, twelve patients (18.5%) were still alive of which ten (15.4%) had a good neurological outcome (Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) 1 or 2). Forty-nine patients (75.4%) met the ECPR inclusion criteria. A total of 2,552,498.34 euro was charged. The patients and the public Belgian healthcare system contributed to a 255,250 euro cost for each survivor after one year with good neurological outcome.

Conclusion

Our analysis highlights the complex interplay between clinical efficacy and financial implications in the utilization of ECPR. While ECPR demonstrates potential in improving survival rates and neurological outcomes among cardiac arrest patients, its adoption presents substantial economic challenges. Inappropriate patient selection may lead to significant increases in resource utilisation without improved outcome.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Resuscitation plus
Resuscitation plus Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
52 days
期刊最新文献
Prehospital ventilation strategies in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A protocol for a randomized controlled trial (PIVOT trial) Effect of introduction of a rapid response system and increasing Medical Emergency Team (MET) activity on mortality over a 20-year period in a paediatric specialist hospital Cardiopulmonary resuscitation in obese patients: A scoping review Effect of chest compressions in addition to extracorporeal life support on carotid flow in an experimental model of refractory cardiac arrest in pigs Ventilation practices and preparedness of healthcare providers in term newborn resuscitation: A comprehensive survey study in Austrian hospitals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1