{"title":"中国不同阶段内镜护理护士能力评价指标体系的开发与验证：改良德尔菲研究","authors":"Liangyu Fang , Bingbing Wu , Peipei Wang , Laijuan Chen , Yinchuan Xu","doi":"10.1016/j.nedt.2024.106411","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The advancement of endoscopic techniques has resulted in an increasing need for comprehensive competency in endoscopy nursing. However, there is currently no unified competency evaluation index system for nurse endoscopists in China.</p></div><div><h3>Aims</h3><p>To develop and validate of a competency evaluation index system for nurse endoscopists with different stages performing endoscopy nursing in China.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>A modified Delphi study.</p></div><div><h3>Settings</h3><p>Data were collected in a medical university affiliated hospital.</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>A total of 569 participants in different fields were included at various phases of this research.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The preliminary indicators were designed after conducting a literature review, semi-structured interviews and questionnaires. Two rounds of correspondence with 30 experts using the Delphi method were conducted to evaluate the content of the index followed by reliability and validity tests. The competency evaluation index system for nurse endoscopists at different stages was developed through expert meetings based on the Delphi consultation results according to the novice-to-expert model.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>After two rounds of Delphi method consultation, we have established 4 first-level indicators (‘Cognitive skill’, ‘Practice professional skills’, ‘Professional development skills’ and ‘Personal characteristics and inner qualities’) and 21 s-level indicators, which are the detailed description of first-level indicators. According to the index weight analysis, the four first-level indicators are ranked from the largest to the smallest as practical professional skills, cognitive skills, professional development skills, personal characteristics and intrinsic qualities. Three different stages of nurse endoscopists competency evaluation forms and criteria were developed: primary stage (New skilled), intermediate stage (Capable) and advanced stage (Expert).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The establishment of a competency evaluation index system based on the novice-to-expert model can accurately assess competency levels and help to effectively train the nurse endoscopists at different stages. Future research should focus on imbedding these competencies in nurse education.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54704,"journal":{"name":"Nurse Education Today","volume":"144 ","pages":"Article 106411"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and validation of a competency evaluation index system for nurse endoscopists with different stages performing endoscopy nursing in China: A modified Delphi study\",\"authors\":\"Liangyu Fang , Bingbing Wu , Peipei Wang , Laijuan Chen , Yinchuan Xu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.nedt.2024.106411\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The advancement of endoscopic techniques has resulted in an increasing need for comprehensive competency in endoscopy nursing. However, there is currently no unified competency evaluation index system for nurse endoscopists in China.</p></div><div><h3>Aims</h3><p>To develop and validate of a competency evaluation index system for nurse endoscopists with different stages performing endoscopy nursing in China.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>A modified Delphi study.</p></div><div><h3>Settings</h3><p>Data were collected in a medical university affiliated hospital.</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>A total of 569 participants in different fields were included at various phases of this research.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The preliminary indicators were designed after conducting a literature review, semi-structured interviews and questionnaires. Two rounds of correspondence with 30 experts using the Delphi method were conducted to evaluate the content of the index followed by reliability and validity tests. The competency evaluation index system for nurse endoscopists at different stages was developed through expert meetings based on the Delphi consultation results according to the novice-to-expert model.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>After two rounds of Delphi method consultation, we have established 4 first-level indicators (‘Cognitive skill’, ‘Practice professional skills’, ‘Professional development skills’ and ‘Personal characteristics and inner qualities’) and 21 s-level indicators, which are the detailed description of first-level indicators. According to the index weight analysis, the four first-level indicators are ranked from the largest to the smallest as practical professional skills, cognitive skills, professional development skills, personal characteristics and intrinsic qualities. Three different stages of nurse endoscopists competency evaluation forms and criteria were developed: primary stage (New skilled), intermediate stage (Capable) and advanced stage (Expert).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The establishment of a competency evaluation index system based on the novice-to-expert model can accurately assess competency levels and help to effectively train the nurse endoscopists at different stages. Future research should focus on imbedding these competencies in nurse education.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54704,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nurse Education Today\",\"volume\":\"144 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106411\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nurse Education Today\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0260691724003216\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nurse Education Today","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0260691724003216","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Development and validation of a competency evaluation index system for nurse endoscopists with different stages performing endoscopy nursing in China: A modified Delphi study
Background
The advancement of endoscopic techniques has resulted in an increasing need for comprehensive competency in endoscopy nursing. However, there is currently no unified competency evaluation index system for nurse endoscopists in China.
Aims
To develop and validate of a competency evaluation index system for nurse endoscopists with different stages performing endoscopy nursing in China.
Design
A modified Delphi study.
Settings
Data were collected in a medical university affiliated hospital.
Participants
A total of 569 participants in different fields were included at various phases of this research.
Methods
The preliminary indicators were designed after conducting a literature review, semi-structured interviews and questionnaires. Two rounds of correspondence with 30 experts using the Delphi method were conducted to evaluate the content of the index followed by reliability and validity tests. The competency evaluation index system for nurse endoscopists at different stages was developed through expert meetings based on the Delphi consultation results according to the novice-to-expert model.
Results
After two rounds of Delphi method consultation, we have established 4 first-level indicators (‘Cognitive skill’, ‘Practice professional skills’, ‘Professional development skills’ and ‘Personal characteristics and inner qualities’) and 21 s-level indicators, which are the detailed description of first-level indicators. According to the index weight analysis, the four first-level indicators are ranked from the largest to the smallest as practical professional skills, cognitive skills, professional development skills, personal characteristics and intrinsic qualities. Three different stages of nurse endoscopists competency evaluation forms and criteria were developed: primary stage (New skilled), intermediate stage (Capable) and advanced stage (Expert).
Conclusions
The establishment of a competency evaluation index system based on the novice-to-expert model can accurately assess competency levels and help to effectively train the nurse endoscopists at different stages. Future research should focus on imbedding these competencies in nurse education.
期刊介绍：
Nurse Education Today is the leading international journal providing a forum for the publication of high quality original research, review and debate in the discussion of nursing, midwifery and interprofessional health care education, publishing papers which contribute to the advancement of educational theory and pedagogy that support the evidence-based practice for educationalists worldwide. The journal stimulates and values critical scholarly debate on issues that have strategic relevance for leaders of health care education.
The journal publishes the highest quality scholarly contributions reflecting the diversity of people, health and education systems worldwide, by publishing research that employs rigorous methodology as well as by publishing papers that highlight the theoretical underpinnings of education and systems globally. The journal will publish papers that show depth, rigour, originality and high standards of presentation, in particular, work that is original, analytical and constructively critical of both previous work and current initiatives.
Authors are invited to submit original research, systematic and scholarly reviews, and critical papers which will stimulate debate on research, policy, theory or philosophy of nursing and related health care education, and which will meet and develop the journal''s high academic and ethical standards.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
