结构性石油价格冲击对金融市场不确定性的时变效应

IF 13.6 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS Energy Economics Pub Date : 2024-09-19 DOI:10.1016/j.eneco.2024.107910
Junqi Yang, Jiang-Bo Geng, Ziwei Liang
{"title":"结构性石油价格冲击对金融市场不确定性的时变效应","authors":"Junqi Yang,&nbsp;Jiang-Bo Geng,&nbsp;Ziwei Liang","doi":"10.1016/j.eneco.2024.107910","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study employed the structural oil price decomposition method proposed by Ready (2018) to decompose oil price shocks into oil risk shocks, demand shocks, and supply shocks. By using the Diebold and Yilmaz (DY) spillover index and rolling window methods, the static and dynamic spillovers of structural oil price shocks on financial market uncertainty were examined. The findings suggest that oil risk shocks exhibited the strongest spillover effects on financial market uncertainty (except for South Africa), followed by oil demand shocks, while oil supply shocks had virtually no impact. Second, the effects of structural oil price shocks on financial market uncertainty were time-varying. Third, significant differences in the spillover effects of structural oil price shocks on financial market uncertainty were found across countries, and the spillover effect of oil risk shocks on the financial market uncertainty in the United States was the largest in all periods. Fourth, the spillover effects of oil demand shocks on financial market uncertainty were larger in the high than in the low oil price period (except for Japan). Finally, during the COVID-19 (coronavirus disease) pandemic compared with the pre-epidemic period, the spillover effects of oil risk shocks on the financial market uncertainty in China significantly decreased, while simultaneously, the spillover effects of oil supply shocks on the financial market uncertainty in Australia substantially increased.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11665,"journal":{"name":"Energy Economics","volume":"139 ","pages":"Article 107910"},"PeriodicalIF":13.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Time-varying effects of structural oil price shocks on financial market uncertainty\",\"authors\":\"Junqi Yang,&nbsp;Jiang-Bo Geng,&nbsp;Ziwei Liang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eneco.2024.107910\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This study employed the structural oil price decomposition method proposed by Ready (2018) to decompose oil price shocks into oil risk shocks, demand shocks, and supply shocks. By using the Diebold and Yilmaz (DY) spillover index and rolling window methods, the static and dynamic spillovers of structural oil price shocks on financial market uncertainty were examined. The findings suggest that oil risk shocks exhibited the strongest spillover effects on financial market uncertainty (except for South Africa), followed by oil demand shocks, while oil supply shocks had virtually no impact. Second, the effects of structural oil price shocks on financial market uncertainty were time-varying. Third, significant differences in the spillover effects of structural oil price shocks on financial market uncertainty were found across countries, and the spillover effect of oil risk shocks on the financial market uncertainty in the United States was the largest in all periods. Fourth, the spillover effects of oil demand shocks on financial market uncertainty were larger in the high than in the low oil price period (except for Japan). Finally, during the COVID-19 (coronavirus disease) pandemic compared with the pre-epidemic period, the spillover effects of oil risk shocks on the financial market uncertainty in China significantly decreased, while simultaneously, the spillover effects of oil supply shocks on the financial market uncertainty in Australia substantially increased.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11665,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Economics\",\"volume\":\"139 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107910\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":13.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988324006182\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988324006182","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究采用Ready(2018)提出的结构性油价分解方法,将油价冲击分解为石油风险冲击、需求冲击和供给冲击。通过使用 Diebold 和 Yilmaz(DY)溢出指数法和滚动窗口法,考察了结构性油价冲击对金融市场不确定性的静态和动态溢出效应。研究结果表明,石油风险冲击对金融市场不确定性的溢出效应最强(南非除外),其次是石油需求冲击,而石油供应冲击几乎没有影响。其次,结构性石油价格冲击对金融市场不确定性的影响是时变的。第三,结构性石油价格冲击对金融市场不确定性的溢出效应在不同国家之间存在显著差异,在所有时期,石油风险冲击对美国金融市场不确定性的溢出效应最大。第四,石油需求冲击对金融市场不确定性的溢出效应在高油价时期大于低油价时期(日本除外)。最后,在 COVID-19(冠状病毒病)大流行期间,与流行前相比,石油风险冲击对中国金融市场不确定性的溢出效应显著下降,而与此同时,石油供应冲击对澳大利亚金融市场不确定性的溢出效应大幅上升。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Time-varying effects of structural oil price shocks on financial market uncertainty

This study employed the structural oil price decomposition method proposed by Ready (2018) to decompose oil price shocks into oil risk shocks, demand shocks, and supply shocks. By using the Diebold and Yilmaz (DY) spillover index and rolling window methods, the static and dynamic spillovers of structural oil price shocks on financial market uncertainty were examined. The findings suggest that oil risk shocks exhibited the strongest spillover effects on financial market uncertainty (except for South Africa), followed by oil demand shocks, while oil supply shocks had virtually no impact. Second, the effects of structural oil price shocks on financial market uncertainty were time-varying. Third, significant differences in the spillover effects of structural oil price shocks on financial market uncertainty were found across countries, and the spillover effect of oil risk shocks on the financial market uncertainty in the United States was the largest in all periods. Fourth, the spillover effects of oil demand shocks on financial market uncertainty were larger in the high than in the low oil price period (except for Japan). Finally, during the COVID-19 (coronavirus disease) pandemic compared with the pre-epidemic period, the spillover effects of oil risk shocks on the financial market uncertainty in China significantly decreased, while simultaneously, the spillover effects of oil supply shocks on the financial market uncertainty in Australia substantially increased.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Economics
Energy Economics ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
18.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
524
期刊介绍: Energy Economics is a field journal that focuses on energy economics and energy finance. It covers various themes including the exploitation, conversion, and use of energy, markets for energy commodities and derivatives, regulation and taxation, forecasting, environment and climate, international trade, development, and monetary policy. The journal welcomes contributions that utilize diverse methods such as experiments, surveys, econometrics, decomposition, simulation models, equilibrium models, optimization models, and analytical models. It publishes a combination of papers employing different methods to explore a wide range of topics. The journal's replication policy encourages the submission of replication studies, wherein researchers reproduce and extend the key results of original studies while explaining any differences. Energy Economics is indexed and abstracted in several databases including Environmental Abstracts, Fuel and Energy Abstracts, Social Sciences Citation Index, GEOBASE, Social & Behavioral Sciences, Journal of Economic Literature, INSPEC, and more.
期刊最新文献
Zooming in or zooming out: Energy strategy, developmental parity and regional entrepreneurial dynamism How financial derivatives affect energy firms' ESG The performance of renewable-rich wholesale electricity markets with significant energy storage and flexibility Retraction notice to “Geopolitical oil price uncertainty transmission into core inflation: Evidence from two of the biggest global players” Energy Economics Volume 126, October 2023, 106,983. Novel and old news sentiment in commodity futures markets
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1