刺激间歇对持续注意力的影响

IF 1.3 4区 生物学 Q4 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Behavioural Processes Pub Date : 2024-09-19 DOI:10.1016/j.beproc.2024.105097
Bonnie Humphrey , Daniel B. Stouffer , Averill Moser-Rust , William S. Helton , Randolph C. Grace , Ximena J. Nelson
{"title":"刺激间歇对持续注意力的影响","authors":"Bonnie Humphrey ,&nbsp;Daniel B. Stouffer ,&nbsp;Averill Moser-Rust ,&nbsp;William S. Helton ,&nbsp;Randolph C. Grace ,&nbsp;Ximena J. Nelson","doi":"10.1016/j.beproc.2024.105097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The ability of nervous systems to filter out irrelevant and repetitive stimuli may prevent animals from becoming ‘saturated’ with excess information. However, animals must be particular about which stimuli to attend to and which to ignore, as mistakes may be costly. Using a comparative approach, we explored the effect of interstimulus interval (ISI) between repeated presentations of visual stimuli presented on a screen to test the decrease in responses (response decrement) of both <em>Trite planiceps</em> jumping spiders and untrained <em>Columba livia</em> pigeons, animals with comparable visual ability despite having structurally different visual systems and brain size. We used ISIs of 2.5 s, 5 s, 10 s, predicting that decreases in ISI would lead to progressively less responses to the stimuli. Following from previous work on <em>T. planiceps</em>, we also manipulated pigeon hunger level, finding that hungry birds were initially more responsive than sated pigeons, but the rate of decrease in responses to the stimulus did not differ between the two groups. While a clear response decrement was seen in both species across all conditions, shorter ISIs resulted in more dramatic response decrements, aligning with previous work and with the resource depletion theory posited in the human-based literature.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8746,"journal":{"name":"Behavioural Processes","volume":"222 ","pages":"Article 105097"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0376635724001128/pdfft?md5=f715f981d3283f73e5bcddb115ac110b&pid=1-s2.0-S0376635724001128-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect of interstimulus interval on sustained attention\",\"authors\":\"Bonnie Humphrey ,&nbsp;Daniel B. Stouffer ,&nbsp;Averill Moser-Rust ,&nbsp;William S. Helton ,&nbsp;Randolph C. Grace ,&nbsp;Ximena J. Nelson\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.beproc.2024.105097\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The ability of nervous systems to filter out irrelevant and repetitive stimuli may prevent animals from becoming ‘saturated’ with excess information. However, animals must be particular about which stimuli to attend to and which to ignore, as mistakes may be costly. Using a comparative approach, we explored the effect of interstimulus interval (ISI) between repeated presentations of visual stimuli presented on a screen to test the decrease in responses (response decrement) of both <em>Trite planiceps</em> jumping spiders and untrained <em>Columba livia</em> pigeons, animals with comparable visual ability despite having structurally different visual systems and brain size. We used ISIs of 2.5 s, 5 s, 10 s, predicting that decreases in ISI would lead to progressively less responses to the stimuli. Following from previous work on <em>T. planiceps</em>, we also manipulated pigeon hunger level, finding that hungry birds were initially more responsive than sated pigeons, but the rate of decrease in responses to the stimulus did not differ between the two groups. While a clear response decrement was seen in both species across all conditions, shorter ISIs resulted in more dramatic response decrements, aligning with previous work and with the resource depletion theory posited in the human-based literature.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8746,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Behavioural Processes\",\"volume\":\"222 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105097\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0376635724001128/pdfft?md5=f715f981d3283f73e5bcddb115ac110b&pid=1-s2.0-S0376635724001128-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Behavioural Processes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0376635724001128\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioural Processes","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0376635724001128","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

神经系统过滤无关和重复刺激的能力可以防止动物被过多的信息 "饱和"。然而,动物必须特别注意哪些刺激应该注意,哪些刺激应该忽略,因为错误的代价可能很高。我们采用比较的方法,探索了屏幕上重复出现的视觉刺激之间的刺激间隔(ISI)的影响,以测试Trite planiceps跳蛛和未经训练的Columba livia鸽子的反应下降(反应减弱)。我们使用的 ISI 为 2.5 秒、5 秒和 10 秒,预测 ISI 的减小将导致对刺激的反应逐渐减弱。根据之前对鸽子饥饿程度的研究,我们还操纵了鸽子的饥饿程度,发现饥饿的鸽子最初比饱食的鸽子反应更快,但两组鸽子对刺激的反应下降速度并无差异。虽然在所有条件下,两种鸽子的反应都明显下降,但较短的 ISI 会导致更显著的反应下降,这与之前的研究以及人类文献中提出的资源枯竭理论相一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The effect of interstimulus interval on sustained attention

The ability of nervous systems to filter out irrelevant and repetitive stimuli may prevent animals from becoming ‘saturated’ with excess information. However, animals must be particular about which stimuli to attend to and which to ignore, as mistakes may be costly. Using a comparative approach, we explored the effect of interstimulus interval (ISI) between repeated presentations of visual stimuli presented on a screen to test the decrease in responses (response decrement) of both Trite planiceps jumping spiders and untrained Columba livia pigeons, animals with comparable visual ability despite having structurally different visual systems and brain size. We used ISIs of 2.5 s, 5 s, 10 s, predicting that decreases in ISI would lead to progressively less responses to the stimuli. Following from previous work on T. planiceps, we also manipulated pigeon hunger level, finding that hungry birds were initially more responsive than sated pigeons, but the rate of decrease in responses to the stimulus did not differ between the two groups. While a clear response decrement was seen in both species across all conditions, shorter ISIs resulted in more dramatic response decrements, aligning with previous work and with the resource depletion theory posited in the human-based literature.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Behavioural Processes
Behavioural Processes 生物-动物学
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
144
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Behavioural Processes is dedicated to the publication of high-quality original research on animal behaviour from any theoretical perspective. It welcomes contributions that consider animal behaviour from behavioural analytic, cognitive, ethological, ecological and evolutionary points of view. This list is not intended to be exhaustive, and papers that integrate theory and methodology across disciplines are particularly welcome.
期刊最新文献
Behavioural response of female Lewis rats toward 31-kHz ultrasonic calls Sex-based differences, diurnal and seasonal trends in thermoregulatory behaviour of nesting Painted Stork (Mycteria leucocephala) Amphipods (Gammarus pseudolimnaeus) do not demonstrate a left-right preference in a 3-D printed aquatic T-maze Editorial Board Comparative analysis of tracking and behavioral patterns between wild-type and genetically modified fruit flies using computer vision and statistical methods
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1