在新出现的大流行病或流行病期间为决策者提供开源建模和模拟工具--对实用性和可用性进行系统评估:范围审查更新

Rebecca Sophia Lais , Julia Fitzner , Yeon-Kyeng Lee , Verena Struckmann
{"title":"在新出现的大流行病或流行病期间为决策者提供开源建模和模拟工具--对实用性和可用性进行系统评估:范围审查更新","authors":"Rebecca Sophia Lais ,&nbsp;Julia Fitzner ,&nbsp;Yeon-Kyeng Lee ,&nbsp;Verena Struckmann","doi":"10.1016/j.dialog.2024.100189","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The COVID-19 pandemic had devastating effects on health systems globally. Emerging infectious diseases and pandemics will persist as a global health threat and preparedness for an evidence based response becomes challenging for decision makers. Epidemiological modeling can and has supported decision-making throughout pandemics. This study provides an update of the review “Publicly available software tools for decision-makers during an emergent epidemic—Systematic evaluation of utility and usability”<sup>1.</sup></p></div><div><h3>Research question</h3><p>What epidemiological modeling tools for decision-makers are open-sourced available for the usage in emerging epidemics or pandemics and how useful and user-friendly are these tools?</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A scoping review was conducted. We identified relevant studies through a search of peer-reviewed (Medline Ovid, Embase Ovid, PubMed, Cochrane) and gray literature databases, search engines such as Google, searches through stakeholder websites as well as expert consultations.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of the 66 identified epidemiological modeling tools, 29 were included and qualitatively assessed using five-point-rating scales. The tools showed a good baseline of user-friendliness with variations in assessed components, features and utility. Room for improvement was found, specifically the capability to incorporate external data sources, detailed population descriptions, and geographic resolution.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>Development efforts should prioritize clear communication of uncertainties and expert review processes. Trainings for specific tools should be considered.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Tool usage can enhance decision-making when adapted to the user's needs and purpose. They should be consulted critically rather than followed blindly.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72803,"journal":{"name":"Dialogues in health","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 100189"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S277265332400025X/pdfft?md5=90fc57683593d597334ea8e8daddfe2e&pid=1-s2.0-S277265332400025X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Open-sourced modeling and simulating tools for decision-makers during an emerging pandemic or epidemic – Systematic evaluation of utility and usability: A scoping review update\",\"authors\":\"Rebecca Sophia Lais ,&nbsp;Julia Fitzner ,&nbsp;Yeon-Kyeng Lee ,&nbsp;Verena Struckmann\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.dialog.2024.100189\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The COVID-19 pandemic had devastating effects on health systems globally. Emerging infectious diseases and pandemics will persist as a global health threat and preparedness for an evidence based response becomes challenging for decision makers. Epidemiological modeling can and has supported decision-making throughout pandemics. This study provides an update of the review “Publicly available software tools for decision-makers during an emergent epidemic—Systematic evaluation of utility and usability”<sup>1.</sup></p></div><div><h3>Research question</h3><p>What epidemiological modeling tools for decision-makers are open-sourced available for the usage in emerging epidemics or pandemics and how useful and user-friendly are these tools?</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A scoping review was conducted. We identified relevant studies through a search of peer-reviewed (Medline Ovid, Embase Ovid, PubMed, Cochrane) and gray literature databases, search engines such as Google, searches through stakeholder websites as well as expert consultations.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of the 66 identified epidemiological modeling tools, 29 were included and qualitatively assessed using five-point-rating scales. The tools showed a good baseline of user-friendliness with variations in assessed components, features and utility. Room for improvement was found, specifically the capability to incorporate external data sources, detailed population descriptions, and geographic resolution.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>Development efforts should prioritize clear communication of uncertainties and expert review processes. Trainings for specific tools should be considered.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Tool usage can enhance decision-making when adapted to the user's needs and purpose. They should be consulted critically rather than followed blindly.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72803,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dialogues in health\",\"volume\":\"5 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100189\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S277265332400025X/pdfft?md5=90fc57683593d597334ea8e8daddfe2e&pid=1-s2.0-S277265332400025X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dialogues in health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S277265332400025X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dialogues in health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S277265332400025X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言 COVID-19 大流行对全球卫生系统造成了破坏性影响。新出现的传染病和大流行病将持续威胁全球健康,如何做好准备,采取循证应对措施,对决策者来说具有挑战性。流行病学建模可以而且已经在整个大流行病期间为决策提供了支持。本研究对综述 "突发流行病期间供决策者使用的公开软件工具--实用性和可用性的系统评估 "1 进行了更新。研究问题哪些供决策者使用的流行病学建模工具是开源的,可用于突发流行病或大流行病,这些工具的实用性和用户友好性如何?我们通过搜索同行评审(Medline Ovid、Embase Ovid、PubMed、Cochrane)和灰色文献数据库、谷歌等搜索引擎、通过利益相关者网站搜索以及专家咨询等方式确定了相关研究。这些工具显示出良好的用户友好性基础,但在评估内容、特点和实用性方面存在差异。讨论开发工作应优先考虑明确沟通不确定性和专家审查过程。结论工具的使用如果能适应用户的需求和目的,就能提高决策水平。在使用工具时,应根据用户的需求和目的进行调整,以提高决策效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Open-sourced modeling and simulating tools for decision-makers during an emerging pandemic or epidemic – Systematic evaluation of utility and usability: A scoping review update

Introduction

The COVID-19 pandemic had devastating effects on health systems globally. Emerging infectious diseases and pandemics will persist as a global health threat and preparedness for an evidence based response becomes challenging for decision makers. Epidemiological modeling can and has supported decision-making throughout pandemics. This study provides an update of the review “Publicly available software tools for decision-makers during an emergent epidemic—Systematic evaluation of utility and usability”1.

Research question

What epidemiological modeling tools for decision-makers are open-sourced available for the usage in emerging epidemics or pandemics and how useful and user-friendly are these tools?

Methods

A scoping review was conducted. We identified relevant studies through a search of peer-reviewed (Medline Ovid, Embase Ovid, PubMed, Cochrane) and gray literature databases, search engines such as Google, searches through stakeholder websites as well as expert consultations.

Results

Of the 66 identified epidemiological modeling tools, 29 were included and qualitatively assessed using five-point-rating scales. The tools showed a good baseline of user-friendliness with variations in assessed components, features and utility. Room for improvement was found, specifically the capability to incorporate external data sources, detailed population descriptions, and geographic resolution.

Discussion

Development efforts should prioritize clear communication of uncertainties and expert review processes. Trainings for specific tools should be considered.

Conclusion

Tool usage can enhance decision-making when adapted to the user's needs and purpose. They should be consulted critically rather than followed blindly.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Dialogues in health
Dialogues in health Public Health and Health Policy
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
134 days
期刊最新文献
Correlation between fall experience and life functions among community-dwelling older adults in Japan Breaking barriers: A gender-based quota system in nursing school admission in Bangladesh Success rates and adherence to antiretroviral therapy among treatment-naïve patients in Davao City, Philippines: A ten-year retrospective cohort study An overlooked risk for skin health: Less availability and higher cost of sunscreen for people with melanated skin Genomic analysis of the SARS-CoV-2 variants circulated in the Philippines, 2020–2024
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1