并列护士和患者对护理服务缺失的看法:描述性混合方法设计。

IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Journal of Advanced Nursing Pub Date : 2024-09-20 DOI:10.1111/jan.16476
Mirit Cohen,Anat Drach-Zahavy,Einav Srulovici
{"title":"并列护士和患者对护理服务缺失的看法:描述性混合方法设计。","authors":"Mirit Cohen,Anat Drach-Zahavy,Einav Srulovici","doi":"10.1111/jan.16476","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AIMS\r\nTo compare nurses' and patients' reports of missed nursing care, explore patients' perspectives and utilise these insights to elucidate discrepancies or congruence between perceptions.\r\n\r\nDESIGN\r\nA descriptive mixed-methods design combining quantitative (questionnaires) and qualitative (semi-structured interviews) methods.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nIn the quantitative phase, 143 nurses and 643 patients completed the MISSCARE and MISSCARE-Patient surveys. Correlations between their total missed care scores were examined. In the qualitative phase, 68 patients participated in semi-structured interviews analysed using thematic analysis.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nThe correlation between nurses' and patients' perceptions of missed nursing care was nonsignificant. Qualitative findings revealed three themes: (1) patients' need to preserve individuality; (2) most patients attributed missed care to systemic factors, while some attributed it to nurses' attitudes and (3) emotional responses varied from empathetic understanding, inadvertently enabling more missed care, to frustration and assertiveness to ensure receiving necessary care.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nThis study reveals a significant discrepancy between nurses' and patients' perceptions of missed care. Patient perspectives offer insights into this misalignment, highlighting differences in care priorities and role understanding.\r\n\r\nIMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND/OR PATIENT CARE\r\nEnhancing nurse-patient communication and patient empowerment are crucial. Healthcare institutions should integrate patient feedback into quality initiatives, create supportive work environments and foster a patient-centred care culture. Effectively marketing nurses' expertise and implementing strategies to manage patient assertiveness are essential.\r\n\r\nIMPACT\r\nThis study addresses the discrepancy in perceptions of missed nursing care between nurses and patients. It reveals how patients' care priorities and attributions influence their experience of missed care. Findings will impact healthcare policymakers, nursing educators and hospital administrators, informing strategies to improve care quality, patient satisfaction and nurse work environments across healthcare settings.\r\n\r\nREPORTING METHOD\r\nThe study has adhered to STROBE guidelines for the quantitative component and SRQR guidelines for the qualitative component.\r\n\r\nPATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION\r\nNo patient or public contribution.","PeriodicalId":54897,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advanced Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Juxtaposing Nurses' and Patients' Perspectives of Missed Nursing Care: A Descriptive Mixed Method Design.\",\"authors\":\"Mirit Cohen,Anat Drach-Zahavy,Einav Srulovici\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jan.16476\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"AIMS\\r\\nTo compare nurses' and patients' reports of missed nursing care, explore patients' perspectives and utilise these insights to elucidate discrepancies or congruence between perceptions.\\r\\n\\r\\nDESIGN\\r\\nA descriptive mixed-methods design combining quantitative (questionnaires) and qualitative (semi-structured interviews) methods.\\r\\n\\r\\nMETHODS\\r\\nIn the quantitative phase, 143 nurses and 643 patients completed the MISSCARE and MISSCARE-Patient surveys. Correlations between their total missed care scores were examined. In the qualitative phase, 68 patients participated in semi-structured interviews analysed using thematic analysis.\\r\\n\\r\\nRESULTS\\r\\nThe correlation between nurses' and patients' perceptions of missed nursing care was nonsignificant. Qualitative findings revealed three themes: (1) patients' need to preserve individuality; (2) most patients attributed missed care to systemic factors, while some attributed it to nurses' attitudes and (3) emotional responses varied from empathetic understanding, inadvertently enabling more missed care, to frustration and assertiveness to ensure receiving necessary care.\\r\\n\\r\\nCONCLUSIONS\\r\\nThis study reveals a significant discrepancy between nurses' and patients' perceptions of missed care. Patient perspectives offer insights into this misalignment, highlighting differences in care priorities and role understanding.\\r\\n\\r\\nIMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND/OR PATIENT CARE\\r\\nEnhancing nurse-patient communication and patient empowerment are crucial. Healthcare institutions should integrate patient feedback into quality initiatives, create supportive work environments and foster a patient-centred care culture. Effectively marketing nurses' expertise and implementing strategies to manage patient assertiveness are essential.\\r\\n\\r\\nIMPACT\\r\\nThis study addresses the discrepancy in perceptions of missed nursing care between nurses and patients. It reveals how patients' care priorities and attributions influence their experience of missed care. Findings will impact healthcare policymakers, nursing educators and hospital administrators, informing strategies to improve care quality, patient satisfaction and nurse work environments across healthcare settings.\\r\\n\\r\\nREPORTING METHOD\\r\\nThe study has adhered to STROBE guidelines for the quantitative component and SRQR guidelines for the qualitative component.\\r\\n\\r\\nPATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION\\r\\nNo patient or public contribution.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54897,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Advanced Nursing\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Advanced Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.16476\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advanced Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.16476","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

方法在定量阶段,143 名护士和 643 名患者完成了 MISSCARE 和 MISSCARE-Patient 调查。研究了他们的护理总失分之间的相关性。在定性阶段,68 名患者参加了半结构式访谈,访谈采用主题分析法进行分析。结果护士和患者对护理遗漏的看法之间的相关性不显著。定性研究结果揭示了三个主题:(1)患者需要保持个性;(2)大多数患者将护理遗漏归因于系统性因素,而一些患者则将其归因于护士的态度;(3)患者的情绪反应各不相同,有的表示同情理解,无意中造成更多护理遗漏,有的则表示沮丧和坚持己见,以确保获得必要的护理。加强护患沟通和患者赋权至关重要。医疗机构应将患者的反馈意见纳入质量计划,创造支持性的工作环境,培养以患者为中心的护理文化。有效营销护士的专业知识和实施管理患者自信心的策略至关重要。影响本研究探讨了护士和患者对护理失误的认知差异。它揭示了患者的护理优先级和归因如何影响他们对护理缺失的体验。研究结果将对医疗保健政策制定者、护理教育者和医院管理者产生影响,为改善医疗保健机构的护理质量、患者满意度和护士工作环境的策略提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Juxtaposing Nurses' and Patients' Perspectives of Missed Nursing Care: A Descriptive Mixed Method Design.
AIMS To compare nurses' and patients' reports of missed nursing care, explore patients' perspectives and utilise these insights to elucidate discrepancies or congruence between perceptions. DESIGN A descriptive mixed-methods design combining quantitative (questionnaires) and qualitative (semi-structured interviews) methods. METHODS In the quantitative phase, 143 nurses and 643 patients completed the MISSCARE and MISSCARE-Patient surveys. Correlations between their total missed care scores were examined. In the qualitative phase, 68 patients participated in semi-structured interviews analysed using thematic analysis. RESULTS The correlation between nurses' and patients' perceptions of missed nursing care was nonsignificant. Qualitative findings revealed three themes: (1) patients' need to preserve individuality; (2) most patients attributed missed care to systemic factors, while some attributed it to nurses' attitudes and (3) emotional responses varied from empathetic understanding, inadvertently enabling more missed care, to frustration and assertiveness to ensure receiving necessary care. CONCLUSIONS This study reveals a significant discrepancy between nurses' and patients' perceptions of missed care. Patient perspectives offer insights into this misalignment, highlighting differences in care priorities and role understanding. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND/OR PATIENT CARE Enhancing nurse-patient communication and patient empowerment are crucial. Healthcare institutions should integrate patient feedback into quality initiatives, create supportive work environments and foster a patient-centred care culture. Effectively marketing nurses' expertise and implementing strategies to manage patient assertiveness are essential. IMPACT This study addresses the discrepancy in perceptions of missed nursing care between nurses and patients. It reveals how patients' care priorities and attributions influence their experience of missed care. Findings will impact healthcare policymakers, nursing educators and hospital administrators, informing strategies to improve care quality, patient satisfaction and nurse work environments across healthcare settings. REPORTING METHOD The study has adhered to STROBE guidelines for the quantitative component and SRQR guidelines for the qualitative component. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION No patient or public contribution.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
7.90%
发文量
369
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Advanced Nursing (JAN) contributes to the advancement of evidence-based nursing, midwifery and healthcare by disseminating high quality research and scholarship of contemporary relevance and with potential to advance knowledge for practice, education, management or policy. All JAN papers are required to have a sound scientific, evidential, theoretical or philosophical base and to be critical, questioning and scholarly in approach. As an international journal, JAN promotes diversity of research and scholarship in terms of culture, paradigm and healthcare context. For JAN’s worldwide readership, authors are expected to make clear the wider international relevance of their work and to demonstrate sensitivity to cultural considerations and differences.
期刊最新文献
Preparing Graduate Nursing Students to Lead Nursing Green Teams: Approach and Identified Greening Opportunities and Solutions. A Comprehensive Assessment of the Environmental Impact of Different Infant Feeding Types: The Observational Study GREEN MOTHER. Exploring Emotional Well-Being and Support of Midwives Who Provide Termination of Pregnancy Care: An International Survey. Unconscious bias and (nursing) care. "I Am Forever Changed": A Phenomenological Study of the Existential Experiences of Parents of Children and Young People With Complex Care Needs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1