Robert Stowell-Campos, Erin Lawrence, Elisabeth Breese Marsh, Dawn Merbach
{"title":"治疗中风后疼痛的 Scrambler疗法。","authors":"Robert Stowell-Campos, Erin Lawrence, Elisabeth Breese Marsh, Dawn Merbach","doi":"10.1002/acn3.52201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Strokes involving sensory pathways can result in contralesional pain syndromes often refractory to pharmacologic interventions. Scrambler therapy (ST) is a noninvasive electroanalgesia device used to treat pain caused by peripheral neuropathy; however, data are scarce regarding its use in conditions secondary to central nervous system pathology. We evaluate the efficacy of ST to treat poststroke pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty patients with a history of prior stroke resulting in contralesional pain were randomized to receive ST or Sham as an adjunct to their stable medication regimen. Participants underwent 5 consecutive daily 40-min sessions. The study was blinded to patient and assessor. Pain scores (0-10) were recorded at baseline, pre- and postsession, and 4 weeks after final treatment. Student's t-tests compared differences in the mean change in pain score between groups immediately post-treatment #5, and at 4-weeks. The chi-squared analysis compared the proportion of patients in each group with >50% pain reduction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants randomized to ST had a mean change in pain score of -3.73 (SD 2.85) postintervention and -2.57 (SD 2.07) at 4 weeks, while the Sham group had a mean change in score of -0.94 (SD 1.36) and -0.25 (SD 0.84) (p between groups = 0.012, 0.004, respectively). Significantly more participants treated with ST reported a >50% reduction in pain immediately postintervention compared to Sham (70% vs. 10%, p = 0.006), but not at follow-up (30% vs. 10%, p = ns).</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>ST may effectively decrease poststroke pain compared to Sham. Larger studies are needed to evaluate confounders such as stroke location, time from stroke, and concomitant treatment with medications.</p>","PeriodicalId":126,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology","volume":" ","pages":"2904-2911"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/acn3.52201","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Scrambler therapy for treatment of poststroke pain.\",\"authors\":\"Robert Stowell-Campos, Erin Lawrence, Elisabeth Breese Marsh, Dawn Merbach\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/acn3.52201\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Strokes involving sensory pathways can result in contralesional pain syndromes often refractory to pharmacologic interventions. Scrambler therapy (ST) is a noninvasive electroanalgesia device used to treat pain caused by peripheral neuropathy; however, data are scarce regarding its use in conditions secondary to central nervous system pathology. We evaluate the efficacy of ST to treat poststroke pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty patients with a history of prior stroke resulting in contralesional pain were randomized to receive ST or Sham as an adjunct to their stable medication regimen. Participants underwent 5 consecutive daily 40-min sessions. The study was blinded to patient and assessor. Pain scores (0-10) were recorded at baseline, pre- and postsession, and 4 weeks after final treatment. Student's t-tests compared differences in the mean change in pain score between groups immediately post-treatment #5, and at 4-weeks. The chi-squared analysis compared the proportion of patients in each group with >50% pain reduction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants randomized to ST had a mean change in pain score of -3.73 (SD 2.85) postintervention and -2.57 (SD 2.07) at 4 weeks, while the Sham group had a mean change in score of -0.94 (SD 1.36) and -0.25 (SD 0.84) (p between groups = 0.012, 0.004, respectively). Significantly more participants treated with ST reported a >50% reduction in pain immediately postintervention compared to Sham (70% vs. 10%, p = 0.006), but not at follow-up (30% vs. 10%, p = ns).</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>ST may effectively decrease poststroke pain compared to Sham. Larger studies are needed to evaluate confounders such as stroke location, time from stroke, and concomitant treatment with medications.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":126,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2904-2911\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/acn3.52201\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/acn3.52201\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/acn3.52201","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:涉及感觉通路的中风可导致对侧疼痛综合征,而药物治疗往往难以奏效。Scrambler 疗法(ST)是一种非侵入性电镇痛设备,用于治疗由周围神经病变引起的疼痛;然而,有关其在继发于中枢神经系统病变的病症中的应用的数据却很少。我们评估了 ST 治疗中风后疼痛的疗效:方法:20 名既往中风导致对侧疼痛的患者随机接受 ST 或 Sham 作为稳定药物治疗的辅助治疗。参与者每天连续接受 5 次治疗,每次 40 分钟。该研究对患者和评估者均不设盲区。疼痛评分(0-10 分)在基线、疗程前和疗程后以及最终治疗后 4 周进行记录。学生 t 检验比较了治疗后 5 周和 4 周时各组疼痛评分平均变化的差异。卡方分析比较了各组疼痛减轻>50%的患者比例:随机接受 ST 治疗的患者在干预后疼痛评分的平均变化为-3.73(标准差为 2.85),4 周后疼痛评分的平均变化为-2.57(标准差为 2.07),而接受 Sham 治疗的患者在干预后疼痛评分的平均变化为-0.94(标准差为 1.36),4 周后疼痛评分的平均变化为-0.25(标准差为 0.84)(组间 p 分别为 0.012、0.004)。与 Sham 相比,接受 ST 治疗的患者在干预后疼痛立即减轻 50% 以上的人数显著增加(70% vs. 10%,P = 0.006),但在随访时没有增加(30% vs. 10%,P = ns):与 Sham 相比,ST 可有效减轻中风后疼痛。需要进行更大规模的研究,以评估中风位置、中风时间和同时接受药物治疗等混杂因素。
Scrambler therapy for treatment of poststroke pain.
Objective: Strokes involving sensory pathways can result in contralesional pain syndromes often refractory to pharmacologic interventions. Scrambler therapy (ST) is a noninvasive electroanalgesia device used to treat pain caused by peripheral neuropathy; however, data are scarce regarding its use in conditions secondary to central nervous system pathology. We evaluate the efficacy of ST to treat poststroke pain.
Methods: Twenty patients with a history of prior stroke resulting in contralesional pain were randomized to receive ST or Sham as an adjunct to their stable medication regimen. Participants underwent 5 consecutive daily 40-min sessions. The study was blinded to patient and assessor. Pain scores (0-10) were recorded at baseline, pre- and postsession, and 4 weeks after final treatment. Student's t-tests compared differences in the mean change in pain score between groups immediately post-treatment #5, and at 4-weeks. The chi-squared analysis compared the proportion of patients in each group with >50% pain reduction.
Results: Participants randomized to ST had a mean change in pain score of -3.73 (SD 2.85) postintervention and -2.57 (SD 2.07) at 4 weeks, while the Sham group had a mean change in score of -0.94 (SD 1.36) and -0.25 (SD 0.84) (p between groups = 0.012, 0.004, respectively). Significantly more participants treated with ST reported a >50% reduction in pain immediately postintervention compared to Sham (70% vs. 10%, p = 0.006), but not at follow-up (30% vs. 10%, p = ns).
Interpretation: ST may effectively decrease poststroke pain compared to Sham. Larger studies are needed to evaluate confounders such as stroke location, time from stroke, and concomitant treatment with medications.
期刊介绍:
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology is a peer-reviewed journal for rapid dissemination of high-quality research related to all areas of neurology. The journal publishes original research and scholarly reviews focused on the mechanisms and treatments of diseases of the nervous system; high-impact topics in neurologic education; and other topics of interest to the clinical neuroscience community.