中国 2 型糖尿病患者每两周一次作为二甲双胍附加疗法的辅非格列汀与每日服用利拉利汀的比较:随机、双盲、非劣效试验。

IF 5.4 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism Pub Date : 2024-09-23 DOI:10.1111/dom.15915
Qian Ren, Ling Li, Xiuhai Su, Xiaolin Hu, Guijun Qin, Jie Han, Yu Liu, Junmin Wang, Linong Ji
{"title":"中国 2 型糖尿病患者每两周一次作为二甲双胍附加疗法的辅非格列汀与每日服用利拉利汀的比较:随机、双盲、非劣效试验。","authors":"Qian Ren, Ling Li, Xiuhai Su, Xiaolin Hu, Guijun Qin, Jie Han, Yu Liu, Junmin Wang, Linong Ji","doi":"10.1111/dom.15915","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>We evaluated the efficacy and safety of cofrogliptin, a novel dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor taken once every 2 weeks (Q2W), compared with linagliptin (taken daily) in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on metformin in China.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this phase 3 randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, multicentre study, patients were randomly assigned 1:1:1 to receive cofrogliptin 10 mg Q2W, cofrogliptin 25 mg Q2W, or linagliptin 5 mg daily, all as an add-on treatment to metformin, for 24 weeks. Eligible patients could enter an open-label extension period and receive cofrogliptin 25 mg Q2W for an additional 28 weeks. The primary endpoint was change in glycated haemoglobin from baseline to 24 weeks, with a non-inferiority margin of 0.4% for cofrogliptin versus linagliptin treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 465 patients entered the 24-week treatment period (median age: 57.0 years). The least-squares mean (standard error) change in glycated haemoglobin from baseline to week 24 was -0.96 (0.063), -0.99 (0.064) and -1.07 (0.065) for the cofrogliptin 10 mg, cofrogliptin 25 mg and linagliptin 5 mg groups, respectively. The between-group difference met the predefined margin for non-inferiority of cofrogliptin (10 and 25 mg) versus linagliptin treatment. The incidence of common adverse events (≥5% patients) during the 24-week treatment period was similar between treatment groups. There were no serious hypoglycaemic events.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on metformin, the glucose-lowering effect of cofrogliptin (Q2W) was non-inferior to linagliptin (daily), with a similar safety profile maintained over 52 weeks of treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":158,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cofrogliptin once every 2 weeks as add-on therapy to metformin versus daily linagliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes in China: A randomized, double-blind, non-inferiority trial.\",\"authors\":\"Qian Ren, Ling Li, Xiuhai Su, Xiaolin Hu, Guijun Qin, Jie Han, Yu Liu, Junmin Wang, Linong Ji\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/dom.15915\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>We evaluated the efficacy and safety of cofrogliptin, a novel dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor taken once every 2 weeks (Q2W), compared with linagliptin (taken daily) in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on metformin in China.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this phase 3 randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, multicentre study, patients were randomly assigned 1:1:1 to receive cofrogliptin 10 mg Q2W, cofrogliptin 25 mg Q2W, or linagliptin 5 mg daily, all as an add-on treatment to metformin, for 24 weeks. Eligible patients could enter an open-label extension period and receive cofrogliptin 25 mg Q2W for an additional 28 weeks. The primary endpoint was change in glycated haemoglobin from baseline to 24 weeks, with a non-inferiority margin of 0.4% for cofrogliptin versus linagliptin treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 465 patients entered the 24-week treatment period (median age: 57.0 years). The least-squares mean (standard error) change in glycated haemoglobin from baseline to week 24 was -0.96 (0.063), -0.99 (0.064) and -1.07 (0.065) for the cofrogliptin 10 mg, cofrogliptin 25 mg and linagliptin 5 mg groups, respectively. The between-group difference met the predefined margin for non-inferiority of cofrogliptin (10 and 25 mg) versus linagliptin treatment. The incidence of common adverse events (≥5% patients) during the 24-week treatment period was similar between treatment groups. There were no serious hypoglycaemic events.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on metformin, the glucose-lowering effect of cofrogliptin (Q2W) was non-inferior to linagliptin (daily), with a similar safety profile maintained over 52 weeks of treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":158,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.15915\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.15915","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:我们评估了在中国二甲双胍治疗控制不佳的2型糖尿病患者中,每两周服用一次(Q2W)的新型二肽基肽酶-4抑制剂辅非格列汀与利拉利汀(每日服用)相比的疗效和安全性:在这项3期随机、双盲、主动对照、多中心研究中,患者按1:1:1的比例被随机分配到接受复格列汀10毫克每2周1次、复格列汀25毫克每2周1次或利拉利汀5毫克每天1次的治疗,所有治疗均作为二甲双胍的附加治疗,为期24周。符合条件的患者可进入开放标签延长期,接受25毫克每2周一次的复格列汀治疗,延长28周。主要终点是糖化血红蛋白从基线到24周的变化,与利拉利汀治疗相比,辅非格列汀的非劣效差为0.4%:共有 465 名患者进入 24 周治疗期(中位年龄:57.0 岁)。从基线到第24周,辅非格列汀10毫克组、辅非格列汀25毫克组和利拉利汀5毫克组糖化血红蛋白的最小二乘平均值(标准误差)变化分别为-0.96(0.063)、-0.99(0.064)和-1.07(0.065)。与利拉利汀治疗相比,辅格列汀(10 毫克和 25 毫克)的组间差异达到了非劣效性的预定差值。在24周的治疗期间,各治疗组的常见不良事件发生率(≥5%的患者)相似。没有发生严重的低血糖事件:结论:在二甲双胍治疗控制不佳的中国2型糖尿病患者中,复格列汀(Q2W)的降糖效果不劣于利拉利汀(每日),且在52周的治疗中保持了相似的安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Cofrogliptin once every 2 weeks as add-on therapy to metformin versus daily linagliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes in China: A randomized, double-blind, non-inferiority trial.

Aim: We evaluated the efficacy and safety of cofrogliptin, a novel dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor taken once every 2 weeks (Q2W), compared with linagliptin (taken daily) in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on metformin in China.

Materials and methods: In this phase 3 randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, multicentre study, patients were randomly assigned 1:1:1 to receive cofrogliptin 10 mg Q2W, cofrogliptin 25 mg Q2W, or linagliptin 5 mg daily, all as an add-on treatment to metformin, for 24 weeks. Eligible patients could enter an open-label extension period and receive cofrogliptin 25 mg Q2W for an additional 28 weeks. The primary endpoint was change in glycated haemoglobin from baseline to 24 weeks, with a non-inferiority margin of 0.4% for cofrogliptin versus linagliptin treatment.

Results: Overall, 465 patients entered the 24-week treatment period (median age: 57.0 years). The least-squares mean (standard error) change in glycated haemoglobin from baseline to week 24 was -0.96 (0.063), -0.99 (0.064) and -1.07 (0.065) for the cofrogliptin 10 mg, cofrogliptin 25 mg and linagliptin 5 mg groups, respectively. The between-group difference met the predefined margin for non-inferiority of cofrogliptin (10 and 25 mg) versus linagliptin treatment. The incidence of common adverse events (≥5% patients) during the 24-week treatment period was similar between treatment groups. There were no serious hypoglycaemic events.

Conclusion: In Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on metformin, the glucose-lowering effect of cofrogliptin (Q2W) was non-inferior to linagliptin (daily), with a similar safety profile maintained over 52 weeks of treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism
Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
6.90%
发文量
319
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism is primarily a journal of clinical and experimental pharmacology and therapeutics covering the interrelated areas of diabetes, obesity and metabolism. The journal prioritises high-quality original research that reports on the effects of new or existing therapies, including dietary, exercise and lifestyle (non-pharmacological) interventions, in any aspect of metabolic and endocrine disease, either in humans or animal and cellular systems. ‘Metabolism’ may relate to lipids, bone and drug metabolism, or broader aspects of endocrine dysfunction. Preclinical pharmacology, pharmacokinetic studies, meta-analyses and those addressing drug safety and tolerability are also highly suitable for publication in this journal. Original research may be published as a main paper or as a research letter.
期刊最新文献
Continuous ketone monitoring: Exciting implications for clinical practice. Cofrogliptin once every 2 weeks as add-on therapy to metformin versus daily linagliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes in China: A randomized, double-blind, non-inferiority trial. Changes in insulin utilization in China from 2020 to 2022. Visceral and subcutaneous adiposity and cardiovascular disease: Unravelling associations and prognostic value. A novel, centrally acting mammalian aminosterol, ENT-03, induces weight loss in obese and lean rodents.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1