根据细胞学内在性慢性鼻窦炎伴鼻息肉的临床特征。

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY Acta Oto-Laryngologica Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-21 DOI:10.1080/00016489.2024.2396487
Ruru Tian, Jianhua Jiang, Xiangyan Wu, Jie Ling Zhao, Xin Ru Zhou, Jinv Ding
{"title":"根据细胞学内在性慢性鼻窦炎伴鼻息肉的临床特征。","authors":"Ruru Tian, Jianhua Jiang, Xiangyan Wu, Jie Ling Zhao, Xin Ru Zhou, Jinv Ding","doi":"10.1080/00016489.2024.2396487","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The clinical phenotypes of CRS, such as the presence or absence of polyps, cannot well reflect the pathophysiological mechanisms and characteristics of patients. Only by distinguishing the different internal types of CRS can we individualize patients more accurately.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the clinical characteristics of chronic rhinosinusitis with different cell types (CRSwNP), and to provide a reference for the diagnosis and treatment of CRSwNP.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The cytological endotypes of CRSwNP were divided into five groups by cluster analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a significant difference in the proportion of CRSwNP with different endotypes. There were significant differences in peripheral blood eosinophils, cerebrovascular disease, and unilateral and bilateral nasal polyps among CRSWNP patients with different cytological types.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Mixed CRSwNP and eosinophilic CRSwNP are the most common, while neutrophilic CRSWNP is the least common. Eosinophilic CRSwNP is more common in bilateral nasal polyps, with a high recurrence rate and a high probability of olfactory dysfunction. Neutrophilic CRSwNP is more common in elderly patients with cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases. Compared with total serum IgE, the percentage of eosinophils in peripheral blood is more helpful for the diagnosis of eosinophilic CRSwNP.</p>","PeriodicalId":6880,"journal":{"name":"Acta Oto-Laryngologica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Based on the clinical features of cytologically intrinsic chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps.\",\"authors\":\"Ruru Tian, Jianhua Jiang, Xiangyan Wu, Jie Ling Zhao, Xin Ru Zhou, Jinv Ding\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00016489.2024.2396487\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The clinical phenotypes of CRS, such as the presence or absence of polyps, cannot well reflect the pathophysiological mechanisms and characteristics of patients. Only by distinguishing the different internal types of CRS can we individualize patients more accurately.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the clinical characteristics of chronic rhinosinusitis with different cell types (CRSwNP), and to provide a reference for the diagnosis and treatment of CRSwNP.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The cytological endotypes of CRSwNP were divided into five groups by cluster analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a significant difference in the proportion of CRSwNP with different endotypes. There were significant differences in peripheral blood eosinophils, cerebrovascular disease, and unilateral and bilateral nasal polyps among CRSWNP patients with different cytological types.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Mixed CRSwNP and eosinophilic CRSwNP are the most common, while neutrophilic CRSWNP is the least common. Eosinophilic CRSwNP is more common in bilateral nasal polyps, with a high recurrence rate and a high probability of olfactory dysfunction. Neutrophilic CRSwNP is more common in elderly patients with cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases. Compared with total serum IgE, the percentage of eosinophils in peripheral blood is more helpful for the diagnosis of eosinophilic CRSwNP.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":6880,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Oto-Laryngologica\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Oto-Laryngologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00016489.2024.2396487\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Oto-Laryngologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00016489.2024.2396487","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:CRS的临床表型,如有无息肉,不能很好地反映患者的病理生理机制和特征。只有区分 CRS 的不同内部类型,才能更准确地对患者进行个体化治疗:研究不同细胞类型慢性鼻窦炎(CRSwNP)的临床特征,为CRSwNP的诊断和治疗提供参考:通过聚类分析将CRSwNP的细胞学内型分为五组:结果:不同内型的CRSwNP比例存在明显差异。不同细胞学类型的 CRSwNP 患者在外周血嗜酸性粒细胞、脑血管疾病、单侧和双侧鼻息肉方面存在明显差异:结论:混合型 CRSwNP 和嗜酸性 CRSwNP 最常见,而嗜中性 CRSWNP 最不常见。嗜酸性 CRSwNP 更常见于双侧鼻息肉,复发率高,出现嗅觉功能障碍的概率也很高。嗜中性粒细胞 CRSwNP 更常见于患有心脑血管疾病的老年患者。与血清总 IgE 相比,外周血中嗜酸性粒细胞的百分比更有助于诊断嗜酸性粒细胞性 CRSwNP。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Based on the clinical features of cytologically intrinsic chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps.

Background: The clinical phenotypes of CRS, such as the presence or absence of polyps, cannot well reflect the pathophysiological mechanisms and characteristics of patients. Only by distinguishing the different internal types of CRS can we individualize patients more accurately.

Objective: To investigate the clinical characteristics of chronic rhinosinusitis with different cell types (CRSwNP), and to provide a reference for the diagnosis and treatment of CRSwNP.

Materials and methods: The cytological endotypes of CRSwNP were divided into five groups by cluster analysis.

Results: There was a significant difference in the proportion of CRSwNP with different endotypes. There were significant differences in peripheral blood eosinophils, cerebrovascular disease, and unilateral and bilateral nasal polyps among CRSWNP patients with different cytological types.

Conclusions: Mixed CRSwNP and eosinophilic CRSwNP are the most common, while neutrophilic CRSWNP is the least common. Eosinophilic CRSwNP is more common in bilateral nasal polyps, with a high recurrence rate and a high probability of olfactory dysfunction. Neutrophilic CRSwNP is more common in elderly patients with cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases. Compared with total serum IgE, the percentage of eosinophils in peripheral blood is more helpful for the diagnosis of eosinophilic CRSwNP.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Oto-Laryngologica
Acta Oto-Laryngologica 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
99
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Oto-Laryngologica is a truly international journal for translational otolaryngology and head- and neck surgery. The journal presents cutting-edge papers on clinical practice, clinical research and basic sciences. Acta also bridges the gap between clinical and basic research.
期刊最新文献
Impact of fast-track on recurrence and malignant transformation of patients with inverted papilloma. Analysis of influencing factors of residual dizziness after repositioning of horizontal semicircular canal benign paroxysmal positional vertigo. Long-term outcomes of extracapsular tonsillectomy in the treatment of obstructive sleep apnoea in adults. Ototoxicity associated with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; what are the risk factors? Plasma knife sphenopalatine artery cauterization via lateral nasal wall incision for posterior epistaxis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1