Po-Hsueh Su, Ting-Hsing Chao, Mu-Shiang Huang, Wei-Chuan Tsai
{"title":"主动脉瓣置换术后假体与患者不匹配的决定因素--台湾单一中心的十年队列数据。","authors":"Po-Hsueh Su, Ting-Hsing Chao, Mu-Shiang Huang, Wei-Chuan Tsai","doi":"10.6515/ACS.202409_40(5).20240207B","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patient-prosthesis mismatch (PPM) after surgical aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis has a significant effect on survival. Few studies have identified the risk factors for PPM and related outcomes. This study investigated these risk factors and clarified the outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study enrolled consecutive patients who underwent aortic valve replacement surgery between January 2010 and June 2020 in our hospital. Data on clinical profiles, prosthesis types, echocardiographic parameters before and after surgery, and clinical outcomes including the composite of all-cause mortality and redo valve replacement were collected. We defined moderate and severe PPM as an effective orifice area index value of ≤ 0.85 and ≤ 0.65 cm<sup>2</sup>/m<sup>2</sup>, respectively, measured postoperatively through echocardiography. Potential risk factors for PPM and clinical outcomes were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 185 patients were enrolled. Body surface area (BSA; 1.68 ± 0.02 vs. 1.62 ± 0.01 m<sup>2</sup>, p = 0.036), renal insufficiency (32.50% vs. 11.70%, p = 0.026), and aortic annulus diameter (1.99 ± 0.05 vs. 2.17 ± 0.03 cm, p = 0.013) were statistically significant risk factors for severe PPM. The primary outcome was observed in 30.00% and 15.86% of the patients with and without severe PPM, respectively (log-rank p = 0.023). Multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis indicated that severe PPM was a risk factor for the primary outcome (hazard ratio: 2.688, 95% confidence interval: 1.094-6.622, p = 0.031).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study demonstrated that large BSA, renal insufficiency, and small annulus diameter were risk factors for severe PPM after aortic valve replacement surgery. Severe PPM was associated with worse clinical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":6957,"journal":{"name":"Acta Cardiologica Sinica","volume":"40 5","pages":"595-607"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11413942/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Determinants of Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch after Aortic Valve Replacement-Ten-Year Cohort Data in Single Center of Taiwan.\",\"authors\":\"Po-Hsueh Su, Ting-Hsing Chao, Mu-Shiang Huang, Wei-Chuan Tsai\",\"doi\":\"10.6515/ACS.202409_40(5).20240207B\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patient-prosthesis mismatch (PPM) after surgical aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis has a significant effect on survival. Few studies have identified the risk factors for PPM and related outcomes. This study investigated these risk factors and clarified the outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study enrolled consecutive patients who underwent aortic valve replacement surgery between January 2010 and June 2020 in our hospital. Data on clinical profiles, prosthesis types, echocardiographic parameters before and after surgery, and clinical outcomes including the composite of all-cause mortality and redo valve replacement were collected. We defined moderate and severe PPM as an effective orifice area index value of ≤ 0.85 and ≤ 0.65 cm<sup>2</sup>/m<sup>2</sup>, respectively, measured postoperatively through echocardiography. Potential risk factors for PPM and clinical outcomes were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 185 patients were enrolled. Body surface area (BSA; 1.68 ± 0.02 vs. 1.62 ± 0.01 m<sup>2</sup>, p = 0.036), renal insufficiency (32.50% vs. 11.70%, p = 0.026), and aortic annulus diameter (1.99 ± 0.05 vs. 2.17 ± 0.03 cm, p = 0.013) were statistically significant risk factors for severe PPM. The primary outcome was observed in 30.00% and 15.86% of the patients with and without severe PPM, respectively (log-rank p = 0.023). Multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis indicated that severe PPM was a risk factor for the primary outcome (hazard ratio: 2.688, 95% confidence interval: 1.094-6.622, p = 0.031).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study demonstrated that large BSA, renal insufficiency, and small annulus diameter were risk factors for severe PPM after aortic valve replacement surgery. Severe PPM was associated with worse clinical outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":6957,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Cardiologica Sinica\",\"volume\":\"40 5\",\"pages\":\"595-607\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11413942/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Cardiologica Sinica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.6515/ACS.202409_40(5).20240207B\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Cardiologica Sinica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6515/ACS.202409_40(5).20240207B","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Determinants of Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch after Aortic Valve Replacement-Ten-Year Cohort Data in Single Center of Taiwan.
Background: Patient-prosthesis mismatch (PPM) after surgical aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis has a significant effect on survival. Few studies have identified the risk factors for PPM and related outcomes. This study investigated these risk factors and clarified the outcomes.
Methods: This study enrolled consecutive patients who underwent aortic valve replacement surgery between January 2010 and June 2020 in our hospital. Data on clinical profiles, prosthesis types, echocardiographic parameters before and after surgery, and clinical outcomes including the composite of all-cause mortality and redo valve replacement were collected. We defined moderate and severe PPM as an effective orifice area index value of ≤ 0.85 and ≤ 0.65 cm2/m2, respectively, measured postoperatively through echocardiography. Potential risk factors for PPM and clinical outcomes were evaluated.
Results: A total of 185 patients were enrolled. Body surface area (BSA; 1.68 ± 0.02 vs. 1.62 ± 0.01 m2, p = 0.036), renal insufficiency (32.50% vs. 11.70%, p = 0.026), and aortic annulus diameter (1.99 ± 0.05 vs. 2.17 ± 0.03 cm, p = 0.013) were statistically significant risk factors for severe PPM. The primary outcome was observed in 30.00% and 15.86% of the patients with and without severe PPM, respectively (log-rank p = 0.023). Multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis indicated that severe PPM was a risk factor for the primary outcome (hazard ratio: 2.688, 95% confidence interval: 1.094-6.622, p = 0.031).
Conclusions: Our study demonstrated that large BSA, renal insufficiency, and small annulus diameter were risk factors for severe PPM after aortic valve replacement surgery. Severe PPM was associated with worse clinical outcomes.
期刊介绍:
Acta Cardiologica Sinica welcomes all the papers in the fields related to cardiovascular medicine including basic research, vascular biology, clinical pharmacology, clinical trial, critical care medicine, coronary artery disease, interventional cardiology, arrythmia and electrophysiology, atherosclerosis, hypertension, cardiomyopathy and heart failure, valvular and structure cardiac disease, pediatric cardiology, cardiovascular surgery, and so on. We received papers from more than 20 countries and areas of the world. Currently, 40% of the papers were submitted to Acta Cardiologica Sinica from Taiwan, 20% from China, and 20% from the other countries and areas in the world. The acceptance rate for publication was around 50% in general.