主动脉瓣置换术后假体与患者不匹配的决定因素--台湾单一中心的十年队列数据。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Acta Cardiologica Sinica Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI:10.6515/ACS.202409_40(5).20240207B
Po-Hsueh Su, Ting-Hsing Chao, Mu-Shiang Huang, Wei-Chuan Tsai
{"title":"主动脉瓣置换术后假体与患者不匹配的决定因素--台湾单一中心的十年队列数据。","authors":"Po-Hsueh Su, Ting-Hsing Chao, Mu-Shiang Huang, Wei-Chuan Tsai","doi":"10.6515/ACS.202409_40(5).20240207B","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patient-prosthesis mismatch (PPM) after surgical aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis has a significant effect on survival. Few studies have identified the risk factors for PPM and related outcomes. This study investigated these risk factors and clarified the outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study enrolled consecutive patients who underwent aortic valve replacement surgery between January 2010 and June 2020 in our hospital. Data on clinical profiles, prosthesis types, echocardiographic parameters before and after surgery, and clinical outcomes including the composite of all-cause mortality and redo valve replacement were collected. We defined moderate and severe PPM as an effective orifice area index value of ≤ 0.85 and ≤ 0.65 cm<sup>2</sup>/m<sup>2</sup>, respectively, measured postoperatively through echocardiography. Potential risk factors for PPM and clinical outcomes were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 185 patients were enrolled. Body surface area (BSA; 1.68 ± 0.02 vs. 1.62 ± 0.01 m<sup>2</sup>, p = 0.036), renal insufficiency (32.50% vs. 11.70%, p = 0.026), and aortic annulus diameter (1.99 ± 0.05 vs. 2.17 ± 0.03 cm, p = 0.013) were statistically significant risk factors for severe PPM. The primary outcome was observed in 30.00% and 15.86% of the patients with and without severe PPM, respectively (log-rank p = 0.023). Multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis indicated that severe PPM was a risk factor for the primary outcome (hazard ratio: 2.688, 95% confidence interval: 1.094-6.622, p = 0.031).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study demonstrated that large BSA, renal insufficiency, and small annulus diameter were risk factors for severe PPM after aortic valve replacement surgery. Severe PPM was associated with worse clinical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":6957,"journal":{"name":"Acta Cardiologica Sinica","volume":"40 5","pages":"595-607"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11413942/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Determinants of Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch after Aortic Valve Replacement-Ten-Year Cohort Data in Single Center of Taiwan.\",\"authors\":\"Po-Hsueh Su, Ting-Hsing Chao, Mu-Shiang Huang, Wei-Chuan Tsai\",\"doi\":\"10.6515/ACS.202409_40(5).20240207B\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patient-prosthesis mismatch (PPM) after surgical aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis has a significant effect on survival. Few studies have identified the risk factors for PPM and related outcomes. This study investigated these risk factors and clarified the outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study enrolled consecutive patients who underwent aortic valve replacement surgery between January 2010 and June 2020 in our hospital. Data on clinical profiles, prosthesis types, echocardiographic parameters before and after surgery, and clinical outcomes including the composite of all-cause mortality and redo valve replacement were collected. We defined moderate and severe PPM as an effective orifice area index value of ≤ 0.85 and ≤ 0.65 cm<sup>2</sup>/m<sup>2</sup>, respectively, measured postoperatively through echocardiography. Potential risk factors for PPM and clinical outcomes were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 185 patients were enrolled. Body surface area (BSA; 1.68 ± 0.02 vs. 1.62 ± 0.01 m<sup>2</sup>, p = 0.036), renal insufficiency (32.50% vs. 11.70%, p = 0.026), and aortic annulus diameter (1.99 ± 0.05 vs. 2.17 ± 0.03 cm, p = 0.013) were statistically significant risk factors for severe PPM. The primary outcome was observed in 30.00% and 15.86% of the patients with and without severe PPM, respectively (log-rank p = 0.023). Multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis indicated that severe PPM was a risk factor for the primary outcome (hazard ratio: 2.688, 95% confidence interval: 1.094-6.622, p = 0.031).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study demonstrated that large BSA, renal insufficiency, and small annulus diameter were risk factors for severe PPM after aortic valve replacement surgery. Severe PPM was associated with worse clinical outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":6957,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Cardiologica Sinica\",\"volume\":\"40 5\",\"pages\":\"595-607\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11413942/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Cardiologica Sinica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.6515/ACS.202409_40(5).20240207B\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Cardiologica Sinica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6515/ACS.202409_40(5).20240207B","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:重度主动脉瓣狭窄手术主动脉瓣置换术后患者与假体不匹配(PPM)对患者的存活率有很大影响。很少有研究确定了 PPM 的风险因素和相关结果。本研究调查了这些风险因素,并明确了相关结果:本研究招募了 2010 年 1 月至 2020 年 6 月期间在我院接受主动脉瓣置换手术的连续患者。收集了临床概况、假体类型、手术前后超声心动图参数以及临床结果(包括全因死亡率和重做瓣膜置换术的综合结果)的数据。我们将中度和重度PPM定义为术后通过超声心动图测量的有效孔面积指数值分别≤ 0.85和≤ 0.65 cm2/m2。对PPM的潜在风险因素和临床结果进行了评估:结果:共有 185 名患者入选。体表面积(BSA;1.68 ± 0.02 vs. 1.62 ± 0.01 m2,p = 0.036)、肾功能不全(32.50% vs. 11.70%,p = 0.026)和主动脉瓣环直径(1.99 ± 0.05 vs. 2.17 ± 0.03 cm,p = 0.013)是严重 PPM 的显著危险因素。在有和没有严重 PPM 的患者中,分别有 30.00% 和 15.86% 的患者观察到了主要结果(log-rank p = 0.023)。多变量 Cox 比例危险分析表明,严重 PPM 是主要结果的一个危险因素(危险比:2.688,95% 置信区间:1.094-6.622,P = 0.031):我们的研究表明,BSA 大、肾功能不全和瓣环直径小是主动脉瓣置换术后出现严重 PPM 的风险因素。严重的 PPM 与较差的临床预后有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Determinants of Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch after Aortic Valve Replacement-Ten-Year Cohort Data in Single Center of Taiwan.

Background: Patient-prosthesis mismatch (PPM) after surgical aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis has a significant effect on survival. Few studies have identified the risk factors for PPM and related outcomes. This study investigated these risk factors and clarified the outcomes.

Methods: This study enrolled consecutive patients who underwent aortic valve replacement surgery between January 2010 and June 2020 in our hospital. Data on clinical profiles, prosthesis types, echocardiographic parameters before and after surgery, and clinical outcomes including the composite of all-cause mortality and redo valve replacement were collected. We defined moderate and severe PPM as an effective orifice area index value of ≤ 0.85 and ≤ 0.65 cm2/m2, respectively, measured postoperatively through echocardiography. Potential risk factors for PPM and clinical outcomes were evaluated.

Results: A total of 185 patients were enrolled. Body surface area (BSA; 1.68 ± 0.02 vs. 1.62 ± 0.01 m2, p = 0.036), renal insufficiency (32.50% vs. 11.70%, p = 0.026), and aortic annulus diameter (1.99 ± 0.05 vs. 2.17 ± 0.03 cm, p = 0.013) were statistically significant risk factors for severe PPM. The primary outcome was observed in 30.00% and 15.86% of the patients with and without severe PPM, respectively (log-rank p = 0.023). Multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis indicated that severe PPM was a risk factor for the primary outcome (hazard ratio: 2.688, 95% confidence interval: 1.094-6.622, p = 0.031).

Conclusions: Our study demonstrated that large BSA, renal insufficiency, and small annulus diameter were risk factors for severe PPM after aortic valve replacement surgery. Severe PPM was associated with worse clinical outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Cardiologica Sinica
Acta Cardiologica Sinica 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
15.80%
发文量
144
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Cardiologica Sinica welcomes all the papers in the fields related to cardiovascular medicine including basic research, vascular biology, clinical pharmacology, clinical trial, critical care medicine, coronary artery disease, interventional cardiology, arrythmia and electrophysiology, atherosclerosis, hypertension, cardiomyopathy and heart failure, valvular and structure cardiac disease, pediatric cardiology, cardiovascular surgery, and so on. We received papers from more than 20 countries and areas of the world. Currently, 40% of the papers were submitted to Acta Cardiologica Sinica from Taiwan, 20% from China, and 20% from the other countries and areas in the world. The acceptance rate for publication was around 50% in general.
期刊最新文献
18F-Florbetaben PET/CT for the Diagnosis and Subtyping of Cardiac Amyloidosis: A Case Series and Review of the Literature. 2024 Guidelines of the Taiwan Society of Cardiology on the Primary Prevention of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease --- Part I. 2024 Update of the TSOC Expert Consensus of Fabry Disease. A Look is Worth a Thousand Words!! - Case Series of Forearm Compartment Syndrome after Transradial Coronary Intervention. A Strongly Suspected Case of Concomitant Myocarditis in Naegleria fowleri Induced Primary Amoebic Meningoencephalitis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1