Changyin Yao, Bao Feng, Shurong Li, Fan Lin, Changyi Ma, Jin Cui, Yu Liu, Ximiao Wang, Enming Cui
{"title":"利用基于多相 CT 的深度学习模型预测透明细胞肾细胞癌的术后预后。","authors":"Changyin Yao, Bao Feng, Shurong Li, Fan Lin, Changyi Ma, Jin Cui, Yu Liu, Ximiao Wang, Enming Cui","doi":"10.1007/s00261-024-04593-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Some clinicopathological risk stratification systems (CRSSs) such as the leibovich score have been used to predict the postoperative prognosis of patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC), but there are no reliable noninvasive preoperative indicators for predicting postoperative prognosis in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the value of a deep learning (DL) model based on CT images in predicting the postoperative prognosis of patients with ccRCC.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 382 patients with ccRCC were retrospectively enrolled andallocated to training (n = 229) or testing (n = 153) cohorts at a 6:4 ratio. The features were extracted from precontrast-phase (PCP), corticomedullary-phase (CMP) and nephrographic-phase (NP) CT images with ResNet50, and then extreme learning machines (ELMs) were used to construct classification models. The DL model and Leibovich score were compared and combined. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) were used to evaluate model performance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with other single-phase DL models, the three-phase CT-based DL model achieved the best performance, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.839. Combining the three-phase DL model and the Leibovich score (AUC = 0.823) into a nomogram (AUC = 0.888) statistically improved performance (IDI<sub>Nomogram vs. Three-phase</sub> = 0.1358, IDI<sub>Nomogram vs. Leibovich</sub> = 0.1393, [Formula: see text]< 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The CT-based DL model could be valuable for preoperatively predicting the prognosis of patients with ccRCC, and combining it with the Leibovich score can further improve its predictive performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":7126,"journal":{"name":"Abdominal Radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predicting postoperative prognosis in clear cell renal cell carcinoma using a multiphase CT-based deep learning model.\",\"authors\":\"Changyin Yao, Bao Feng, Shurong Li, Fan Lin, Changyi Ma, Jin Cui, Yu Liu, Ximiao Wang, Enming Cui\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00261-024-04593-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Some clinicopathological risk stratification systems (CRSSs) such as the leibovich score have been used to predict the postoperative prognosis of patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC), but there are no reliable noninvasive preoperative indicators for predicting postoperative prognosis in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the value of a deep learning (DL) model based on CT images in predicting the postoperative prognosis of patients with ccRCC.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 382 patients with ccRCC were retrospectively enrolled andallocated to training (n = 229) or testing (n = 153) cohorts at a 6:4 ratio. The features were extracted from precontrast-phase (PCP), corticomedullary-phase (CMP) and nephrographic-phase (NP) CT images with ResNet50, and then extreme learning machines (ELMs) were used to construct classification models. The DL model and Leibovich score were compared and combined. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) were used to evaluate model performance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with other single-phase DL models, the three-phase CT-based DL model achieved the best performance, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.839. Combining the three-phase DL model and the Leibovich score (AUC = 0.823) into a nomogram (AUC = 0.888) statistically improved performance (IDI<sub>Nomogram vs. Three-phase</sub> = 0.1358, IDI<sub>Nomogram vs. Leibovich</sub> = 0.1393, [Formula: see text]< 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The CT-based DL model could be valuable for preoperatively predicting the prognosis of patients with ccRCC, and combining it with the Leibovich score can further improve its predictive performance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7126,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Abdominal Radiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Abdominal Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-024-04593-1\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Abdominal Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-024-04593-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Predicting postoperative prognosis in clear cell renal cell carcinoma using a multiphase CT-based deep learning model.
Background: Some clinicopathological risk stratification systems (CRSSs) such as the leibovich score have been used to predict the postoperative prognosis of patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC), but there are no reliable noninvasive preoperative indicators for predicting postoperative prognosis in clinical practice.
Purpose: To assess the value of a deep learning (DL) model based on CT images in predicting the postoperative prognosis of patients with ccRCC.
Materials and methods: A total of 382 patients with ccRCC were retrospectively enrolled andallocated to training (n = 229) or testing (n = 153) cohorts at a 6:4 ratio. The features were extracted from precontrast-phase (PCP), corticomedullary-phase (CMP) and nephrographic-phase (NP) CT images with ResNet50, and then extreme learning machines (ELMs) were used to construct classification models. The DL model and Leibovich score were compared and combined. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) were used to evaluate model performance.
Results: Compared with other single-phase DL models, the three-phase CT-based DL model achieved the best performance, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.839. Combining the three-phase DL model and the Leibovich score (AUC = 0.823) into a nomogram (AUC = 0.888) statistically improved performance (IDINomogram vs. Three-phase = 0.1358, IDINomogram vs. Leibovich = 0.1393, [Formula: see text]< 0.001).
Conclusion: The CT-based DL model could be valuable for preoperatively predicting the prognosis of patients with ccRCC, and combining it with the Leibovich score can further improve its predictive performance.
期刊介绍:
Abdominal Radiology seeks to meet the professional needs of the abdominal radiologist by publishing clinically pertinent original, review and practice related articles on the gastrointestinal and genitourinary tracts and abdominal interventional and radiologic procedures. Case reports are generally not accepted unless they are the first report of a new disease or condition, or part of a special solicited section.
Reasons to Publish Your Article in Abdominal Radiology:
· Official journal of the Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR)
· Published in Cooperation with:
European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR)
European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR)
Asian Society of Abdominal Radiology (ASAR)
· Efficient handling and Expeditious review
· Author feedback is provided in a mentoring style
· Global readership
· Readers can earn CME credits