双侧乳房缩小术中真皮腺体基底层对乳头术后感觉的不同影响

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Pub Date : 2024-09-20 DOI:10.1007/s00266-024-04331-4
Oluwaseun D Adebagbo, Benjamin Rahmani, John B Park, Amy Chen, Shannon R Garvey, Daniela Lee, Bernard T Lee, Nimish Saxena, Macie Gettings, Ashley Boustany, Samuel J Lin, Ryan P Cauley
{"title":"双侧乳房缩小术中真皮腺体基底层对乳头术后感觉的不同影响","authors":"Oluwaseun D Adebagbo, Benjamin Rahmani, John B Park, Amy Chen, Shannon R Garvey, Daniela Lee, Bernard T Lee, Nimish Saxena, Macie Gettings, Ashley Boustany, Samuel J Lin, Ryan P Cauley","doi":"10.1007/s00266-024-04331-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Decreased nipple sensation following reduction mammoplasty can negatively affect a variety of patient-centered outcomes. This observational study examined the impact of dermoglandular pedicle type on subjective postoperative nipple sensation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 178 women who underwent a bilateral reduction mammoplasty at a single institution from 2017 to 2023 and completed an 11-item survey assessing subjective postoperative nipple sensitivity across various tactile modalities were included. Patient-reported nipple sensations were compared across pedicle type and subgrouped by resection volume.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the included survey respondents, 72% (128) underwent reduction with an inferior pedicle and 28% (50) with a superior or superomedial pedicle. Over 92% of patients reported the preservation of postoperative nipple sensation. Compared to the inferior pedicle, the superior pedicle cohort reported decreased nipple sensitivity to light touch (56% vs 30%, respectively) and temperature (30% vs 15%). In resection weights greater than 500 grams, the superior pedicle cohort was less satisfied with postoperative nipple sensation (84% vs. 58%), reported decreased sensation in light touch (58% vs 24%), pressure (50% vs 21%), and experienced more numbness and tingling (17% vs 1.4%) (all p-values ≤0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The majority of patients maintain some sensation after reduction mammoplasty; however, approximately 10% reported a relative decrease in subjective nipple sensation. Pedicle choice did not significantly affect sensory recovery in resection weights of less than 500 grams. When a greater resection weight is anticipated, the inferior pedicle may be associated with more favorable nipple sensation outcomes.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence iii: </strong>This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .</p>","PeriodicalId":7609,"journal":{"name":"Aesthetic Plastic Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Variability in Postoperative Nipple Sensation by Dermoglandular Pedicle in Bilateral Breast Reduction.\",\"authors\":\"Oluwaseun D Adebagbo, Benjamin Rahmani, John B Park, Amy Chen, Shannon R Garvey, Daniela Lee, Bernard T Lee, Nimish Saxena, Macie Gettings, Ashley Boustany, Samuel J Lin, Ryan P Cauley\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00266-024-04331-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Decreased nipple sensation following reduction mammoplasty can negatively affect a variety of patient-centered outcomes. This observational study examined the impact of dermoglandular pedicle type on subjective postoperative nipple sensation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 178 women who underwent a bilateral reduction mammoplasty at a single institution from 2017 to 2023 and completed an 11-item survey assessing subjective postoperative nipple sensitivity across various tactile modalities were included. Patient-reported nipple sensations were compared across pedicle type and subgrouped by resection volume.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the included survey respondents, 72% (128) underwent reduction with an inferior pedicle and 28% (50) with a superior or superomedial pedicle. Over 92% of patients reported the preservation of postoperative nipple sensation. Compared to the inferior pedicle, the superior pedicle cohort reported decreased nipple sensitivity to light touch (56% vs 30%, respectively) and temperature (30% vs 15%). In resection weights greater than 500 grams, the superior pedicle cohort was less satisfied with postoperative nipple sensation (84% vs. 58%), reported decreased sensation in light touch (58% vs 24%), pressure (50% vs 21%), and experienced more numbness and tingling (17% vs 1.4%) (all p-values ≤0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The majority of patients maintain some sensation after reduction mammoplasty; however, approximately 10% reported a relative decrease in subjective nipple sensation. Pedicle choice did not significantly affect sensory recovery in resection weights of less than 500 grams. When a greater resection weight is anticipated, the inferior pedicle may be associated with more favorable nipple sensation outcomes.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence iii: </strong>This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7609,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Aesthetic Plastic Surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Aesthetic Plastic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-024-04331-4\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aesthetic Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-024-04331-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:乳房缩小整形术后乳头感觉减退会对以患者为中心的各种结果产生负面影响。这项观察性研究探讨了真皮腺蒂类型对术后乳头主观感觉的影响:研究共纳入了 178 名女性,她们于 2017 年至 2023 年期间在一家机构接受了双侧乳房缩小整形术,并完成了一项由 11 个项目组成的调查,通过各种触觉方式评估术后乳头的主观敏感度。患者报告的乳头感觉在不同乳蒂类型中进行了比较,并按切除量进行了分组:在参与调查的受访者中,72%(128 人)接受了下蒂乳头缩小术,28%(50 人)接受了上蒂或上内侧蒂乳头缩小术。超过92%的患者表示术后保留了乳头感觉。与下蒂相比,上蒂患者的乳头对轻触(56% 对 30%)和温度(30% 对 15%)的敏感度降低。在切除重量大于 500 克的患者中,上蒂组对术后乳头感觉的满意度较低(84% 对 58%),轻触感下降(58% 对 24%),压力感下降(50% 对 21%),麻木和刺痛感增加(17% 对 1.4%)(所有 p 值均小于 0.05):结论:大多数患者在乳房缩小整形术后仍能保持一定的感觉,但约有10%的患者报告乳头的主观感觉相对减弱。对于切除重量小于 500 克的患者,选择椎弓根对感觉恢复的影响不大。当预计切除重量较大时,下蒂可能与更有利的乳头感觉结果相关:本期刊要求作者为每篇文章指定证据级别。有关这些循证医学评级的完整说明,请参阅目录或在线作者须知 www.springer.com/00266 。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Variability in Postoperative Nipple Sensation by Dermoglandular Pedicle in Bilateral Breast Reduction.

Background: Decreased nipple sensation following reduction mammoplasty can negatively affect a variety of patient-centered outcomes. This observational study examined the impact of dermoglandular pedicle type on subjective postoperative nipple sensation.

Methods: A total of 178 women who underwent a bilateral reduction mammoplasty at a single institution from 2017 to 2023 and completed an 11-item survey assessing subjective postoperative nipple sensitivity across various tactile modalities were included. Patient-reported nipple sensations were compared across pedicle type and subgrouped by resection volume.

Results: Of the included survey respondents, 72% (128) underwent reduction with an inferior pedicle and 28% (50) with a superior or superomedial pedicle. Over 92% of patients reported the preservation of postoperative nipple sensation. Compared to the inferior pedicle, the superior pedicle cohort reported decreased nipple sensitivity to light touch (56% vs 30%, respectively) and temperature (30% vs 15%). In resection weights greater than 500 grams, the superior pedicle cohort was less satisfied with postoperative nipple sensation (84% vs. 58%), reported decreased sensation in light touch (58% vs 24%), pressure (50% vs 21%), and experienced more numbness and tingling (17% vs 1.4%) (all p-values ≤0.05).

Conclusion: The majority of patients maintain some sensation after reduction mammoplasty; however, approximately 10% reported a relative decrease in subjective nipple sensation. Pedicle choice did not significantly affect sensory recovery in resection weights of less than 500 grams. When a greater resection weight is anticipated, the inferior pedicle may be associated with more favorable nipple sensation outcomes.

Level of evidence iii: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
25.00%
发文量
479
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery is a publication of the International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery and the official journal of the European Association of Societies of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery (EASAPS), Società Italiana di Chirurgia Plastica Ricostruttiva ed Estetica (SICPRE), Vereinigung der Deutschen Aesthetisch Plastischen Chirurgen (VDAPC), the Romanian Aesthetic Surgery Society (RASS), Asociación Española de Cirugía Estética Plástica (AECEP), La Sociedad Argentina de Cirugía Plástica, Estética y Reparadora (SACPER), the Rhinoplasty Society of Europe (RSE), the Iranian Society of Plastic and Aesthetic Surgeons (ISPAS), the Singapore Association of Plastic Surgeons (SAPS), the Australasian Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons (ASAPS), the Egyptian Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons (ESPRS), and the Sociedad Chilena de Cirugía Plástica, Reconstructiva y Estética (SCCP). Aesthetic Plastic Surgery provides a forum for original articles advancing the art of aesthetic plastic surgery. Many describe surgical craftsmanship; others deal with complications in surgical procedures and methods by which to treat or avoid them. Coverage includes "second thoughts" on established techniques, which might be abandoned, modified, or improved. Also included are case histories; improvements in surgical instruments, pharmaceuticals, and operating room equipment; and discussions of problems such as the role of psychosocial factors in the doctor-patient and the patient-public interrelationships. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery is covered in Current Contents/Clinical Medicine, SciSearch, Research Alert, Index Medicus-Medline, and Excerpta Medica/Embase.
期刊最新文献
Age Is Just a Number? The Impact of Age on Abdominoplasty Outcomes: A Single Surgeon Experience. Comparison of Aesthetic Results of Mercedes-Y Versus Inverted-V Incision for Umbilical Reconstruction: A Randomized Clinical Trial. In Their Own Words: Patient Narratives of Breast Cancer Surgery and Reconstruction. Interplay Between Health-Promoting Lifestyle, and Cognitive Emotion Regulation with Risk of Cosmetic Surgery Seeking in Young Women. Development of a Standardized Photo Guideline for Online Hair Transplantation Consultation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1