全身麻醉药物对 GFAP/Iba-1 表达的影响:一项荟萃分析。

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2024-08-15 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.62347/DUFQ3980
Dianjun Liu, Xiangwen Yao, Hao Zhang
{"title":"全身麻醉药物对 GFAP/Iba-1 表达的影响:一项荟萃分析。","authors":"Dianjun Liu, Xiangwen Yao, Hao Zhang","doi":"10.62347/DUFQ3980","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) is a marker associated with astrocyte activation and plays a role in various pathologic processes, including traumatic brain injury, stroke, and neurodegenerative diseases. Interacting boson approximation (Iba-1) is a marker protein for microglia, which are important in neuroinflammatory responses. This meta-analysis aimed to investigate the impact of general anesthetics on the expression of GFAP and Iba-1 in animal models. A meta-analysis was conducted using databases such as PubMed, EMBASE, Springer, and Web of Science. The quality of the selected publications was estimated using the SYRCLE guidelines to ensure credibility and consistency of the research. Continuous variables were measured using mean difference or standardized mean difference (SMD), with a 95% confidence interval (CI) calculated. Ten randomized controlled animal experiments were included in this analysis, utilizing different general anesthetics such as sevoflurane and propofol compared to untreated control groups. The results consistently demonstrated a significant increase in GFAP (SMD = 0.41, 95% CI: 0.09, 0.72, P = 0.01) and Iba-1 (SMD = 0.43, 95% CI: 0.04, 0.83, P = 0.03) expression in the general anesthetic-treated groups, suggesting a neuroinflammatory response induced by these agents. Assessment of publication bias revealed no significant bias in the included studies. This meta-analysis highlights the impact of general anesthetics on GFAP expression in animal models, emphasizing the importance of understanding the neuroinflammatory response associated with anesthesia administration. Further research is warranted to elucidate the underlying molecular pathways and explore possible therapeutic interventions to mitigate adverse effects associated with anesthesia administration.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11384394/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of general anesthesia drugs on GFAP/Iba-1 expression: a meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Dianjun Liu, Xiangwen Yao, Hao Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.62347/DUFQ3980\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) is a marker associated with astrocyte activation and plays a role in various pathologic processes, including traumatic brain injury, stroke, and neurodegenerative diseases. Interacting boson approximation (Iba-1) is a marker protein for microglia, which are important in neuroinflammatory responses. This meta-analysis aimed to investigate the impact of general anesthetics on the expression of GFAP and Iba-1 in animal models. A meta-analysis was conducted using databases such as PubMed, EMBASE, Springer, and Web of Science. The quality of the selected publications was estimated using the SYRCLE guidelines to ensure credibility and consistency of the research. Continuous variables were measured using mean difference or standardized mean difference (SMD), with a 95% confidence interval (CI) calculated. Ten randomized controlled animal experiments were included in this analysis, utilizing different general anesthetics such as sevoflurane and propofol compared to untreated control groups. The results consistently demonstrated a significant increase in GFAP (SMD = 0.41, 95% CI: 0.09, 0.72, P = 0.01) and Iba-1 (SMD = 0.43, 95% CI: 0.04, 0.83, P = 0.03) expression in the general anesthetic-treated groups, suggesting a neuroinflammatory response induced by these agents. Assessment of publication bias revealed no significant bias in the included studies. This meta-analysis highlights the impact of general anesthetics on GFAP expression in animal models, emphasizing the importance of understanding the neuroinflammatory response associated with anesthesia administration. Further research is warranted to elucidate the underlying molecular pathways and explore possible therapeutic interventions to mitigate adverse effects associated with anesthesia administration.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11384394/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.62347/DUFQ3980\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62347/DUFQ3980","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

胶质纤维酸性蛋白(GFAP)是一种与星形胶质细胞活化相关的标志物,在包括脑外伤、中风和神经退行性疾病在内的各种病理过程中发挥作用。相互作用玻色子近似(Iba-1)是小胶质细胞的标志蛋白,在神经炎症反应中起着重要作用。这项荟萃分析旨在研究全身麻醉剂对动物模型中 GFAP 和 Iba-1 表达的影响。荟萃分析使用了 PubMed、EMBASE、Springer 和 Web of Science 等数据库。采用 SYRCLE 指南对所选出版物的质量进行了评估,以确保研究的可信度和一致性。连续变量采用平均差或标准化平均差(SMD)进行测量,并计算出 95% 的置信区间(CI)。本分析包括十项随机对照动物实验,与未经处理的对照组相比,这些实验使用了不同的全身麻醉剂,如七氟醚和异丙酚。结果一致表明,在全身麻醉剂治疗组中,GFAP(SMD = 0.41,95% CI:0.09,0.72,P = 0.01)和 Iba-1 (SMD = 0.43,95% CI:0.04,0.83,P = 0.03)表达明显增加,这表明这些药物诱发了神经炎症反应。对发表偏倚的评估显示,纳入的研究中没有明显的偏倚。这项荟萃分析强调了全身麻醉剂对动物模型中 GFAP 表达的影响,强调了了解与麻醉用药相关的神经炎症反应的重要性。我们有必要开展进一步的研究,以阐明潜在的分子通路并探索可能的治疗干预措施,从而减轻与麻醉相关的不良反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effect of general anesthesia drugs on GFAP/Iba-1 expression: a meta-analysis.

Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) is a marker associated with astrocyte activation and plays a role in various pathologic processes, including traumatic brain injury, stroke, and neurodegenerative diseases. Interacting boson approximation (Iba-1) is a marker protein for microglia, which are important in neuroinflammatory responses. This meta-analysis aimed to investigate the impact of general anesthetics on the expression of GFAP and Iba-1 in animal models. A meta-analysis was conducted using databases such as PubMed, EMBASE, Springer, and Web of Science. The quality of the selected publications was estimated using the SYRCLE guidelines to ensure credibility and consistency of the research. Continuous variables were measured using mean difference or standardized mean difference (SMD), with a 95% confidence interval (CI) calculated. Ten randomized controlled animal experiments were included in this analysis, utilizing different general anesthetics such as sevoflurane and propofol compared to untreated control groups. The results consistently demonstrated a significant increase in GFAP (SMD = 0.41, 95% CI: 0.09, 0.72, P = 0.01) and Iba-1 (SMD = 0.43, 95% CI: 0.04, 0.83, P = 0.03) expression in the general anesthetic-treated groups, suggesting a neuroinflammatory response induced by these agents. Assessment of publication bias revealed no significant bias in the included studies. This meta-analysis highlights the impact of general anesthetics on GFAP expression in animal models, emphasizing the importance of understanding the neuroinflammatory response associated with anesthesia administration. Further research is warranted to elucidate the underlying molecular pathways and explore possible therapeutic interventions to mitigate adverse effects associated with anesthesia administration.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
期刊最新文献
Mentorship in academic musculoskeletal radiology: perspectives from a junior faculty member. Underlying synovial sarcoma undiagnosed for more than 20 years in a patient with regional pain: a case report. Sacrococcygeal chordoma with spontaneous regression due to a large hemorrhagic component. Associations of cumulative voriconazole dose, treatment duration, and alkaline phosphatase with voriconazole-induced periostitis. Can the presence of SLAP-5 lesions be predicted by using the critical shoulder angle in traumatic anterior shoulder instability?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1