{"title":"在常规脑电图 (rEEG) 记录过程中,各种激活程序在诱发发作期和发作间期模式方面的效用。","authors":"Saima Nazish, Erum Shariff, Azra Zafar, Danah Aljaafari, Foziah Alshamrani, Norah A Alkhaldi, Feras Alsulaiman, Rizwana Shahid, Aishah Albakr, Abdullah Alsulaiman, Majed Alabdali, Nehad Soltan, Modhi Alkhaldi","doi":"10.4103/aam.aam_64_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Activation procedures (APs) are adopted during routine electroencephalography (rEEG) to provoke interictal epileptiform abnormalities (EAs). This study aimed to observe interictal and ictal (EAs) of different EEG patterns, provoked by various APs.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>This cross-sectional study was performed in the neurology department of King Fahd hospital of university, Saudi Arabia. The EEGs and medical records of patients who presented for EEG recordings were screened initially, then 146 EEGs provoked EAs due to utilization of APs, were included for analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among all EEGs with provoked EAs, Non-rapid eye movement sleep (NREM) provoked EAs in 93 (63.7%) patients with following patterns, focal spike wave discharges (FSWDs) 45 (P= 0.01), focal spike wave discharges with bilateral synchrony (FSWDBS) 27 (P=0.03) and generalized spike wave discharges (GSWDs) 46 (P=0.01). Intermittent photic stimulation (IPS) most significantly provoked FSWDs in 07 patient (P =0.01) and GSWDs in 30 patients (P=<0.001) 7 patients (P = 0.01) and GSWDs in 30 patients (P < 0.001). Hyperventilation (HV) was associated with a higher occurrence of GSWDs in 37 patients (P =0.01). Female sex 7 (P = 0.02), provoked GSWDs 3 (P = 0.03), NREM sleep 8 (P = 0.04), prolonged EEG record 3 (P = 0.02), clinical events during recording 5 (P ≤ 0.01), diagnosis of genetic 05 (P = 0.03), and immune-mediated epilepsies 2 (P = 0.001) were associated with the provocation of ictal EAs; however, in multiple logistic regression analysis, no statistically significant association of these variables (P ≥ 0.05 each) was noted.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The provocation of EAs in rEEG with different APs varies according to circumstances, including seizure types, epilepsy etiology, and the type of AP applied. These clinical and procedural parameters affect the diagnostic yield of rEEG and need careful consideration during rEEG recordings. APs adopted during rEEG recording can induce FSWDs, FSWDBS, and GSWDs in the form of either interictal or ictal EAs in various etiologies of epilepsy. Ictal EAs may appear in the form of GSWDs, during NREM sleep, in prolonged EEG records; however, their independent association needs to be evaluated in larger sample studies. Further, prospective cohort studies with adequate sample sizes are warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":7938,"journal":{"name":"Annals of African Medicine","volume":"23 4","pages":"688-696"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11556479/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Utility of Various Activation Procedures in Provoking Ictal and Interictal Patterns, during Routine Electroencephalogram (rEEG) Recording.\",\"authors\":\"Saima Nazish, Erum Shariff, Azra Zafar, Danah Aljaafari, Foziah Alshamrani, Norah A Alkhaldi, Feras Alsulaiman, Rizwana Shahid, Aishah Albakr, Abdullah Alsulaiman, Majed Alabdali, Nehad Soltan, Modhi Alkhaldi\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/aam.aam_64_24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Activation procedures (APs) are adopted during routine electroencephalography (rEEG) to provoke interictal epileptiform abnormalities (EAs). This study aimed to observe interictal and ictal (EAs) of different EEG patterns, provoked by various APs.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>This cross-sectional study was performed in the neurology department of King Fahd hospital of university, Saudi Arabia. The EEGs and medical records of patients who presented for EEG recordings were screened initially, then 146 EEGs provoked EAs due to utilization of APs, were included for analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among all EEGs with provoked EAs, Non-rapid eye movement sleep (NREM) provoked EAs in 93 (63.7%) patients with following patterns, focal spike wave discharges (FSWDs) 45 (P= 0.01), focal spike wave discharges with bilateral synchrony (FSWDBS) 27 (P=0.03) and generalized spike wave discharges (GSWDs) 46 (P=0.01). Intermittent photic stimulation (IPS) most significantly provoked FSWDs in 07 patient (P =0.01) and GSWDs in 30 patients (P=<0.001) 7 patients (P = 0.01) and GSWDs in 30 patients (P < 0.001). Hyperventilation (HV) was associated with a higher occurrence of GSWDs in 37 patients (P =0.01). Female sex 7 (P = 0.02), provoked GSWDs 3 (P = 0.03), NREM sleep 8 (P = 0.04), prolonged EEG record 3 (P = 0.02), clinical events during recording 5 (P ≤ 0.01), diagnosis of genetic 05 (P = 0.03), and immune-mediated epilepsies 2 (P = 0.001) were associated with the provocation of ictal EAs; however, in multiple logistic regression analysis, no statistically significant association of these variables (P ≥ 0.05 each) was noted.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The provocation of EAs in rEEG with different APs varies according to circumstances, including seizure types, epilepsy etiology, and the type of AP applied. These clinical and procedural parameters affect the diagnostic yield of rEEG and need careful consideration during rEEG recordings. APs adopted during rEEG recording can induce FSWDs, FSWDBS, and GSWDs in the form of either interictal or ictal EAs in various etiologies of epilepsy. Ictal EAs may appear in the form of GSWDs, during NREM sleep, in prolonged EEG records; however, their independent association needs to be evaluated in larger sample studies. Further, prospective cohort studies with adequate sample sizes are warranted.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7938,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of African Medicine\",\"volume\":\"23 4\",\"pages\":\"688-696\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11556479/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of African Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/aam.aam_64_24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of African Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/aam.aam_64_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:在常规脑电图(rEEG)检查中采用激活程序(APs)来诱发发作间期癫痫样异常(EAs)。本研究旨在观察各种激活程序引发的不同脑电图模式的发作间期和发作期(EAs):这项横断面研究在沙特阿拉伯法赫德国王大学医院神经内科进行。初步筛选了前来进行脑电图记录的患者的脑电图和病历,然后纳入了因使用 APs 而诱发 EAs 的 146 份脑电图进行分析:在所有诱发EAs的脑电图中,93例(63.7%)患者的非快速眼动睡眠(NREM)诱发了EAs,其模式如下:局灶性尖波放电(FSWDs)45例(P=0.01)、局灶性尖波放电与双侧同步(FSWDBS)27例(P=0.03)和泛化尖波放电(GSWDs)46例(P=0.01)。间歇性光刺激(IPS)对 07 名患者的 FSWDs(P=0.01)和 30 名患者的 GSWDs(P=0.01)有最显著的诱发作用:不同 AP 在 rEEG 中引发的 EAs 因情况而异,包括癫痫发作类型、癫痫病因和应用的 AP 类型。这些临床和程序参数会影响脑电图的诊断率,因此在脑电图记录时需要仔细考虑。在记录 rEEG 时采用的 AP 可诱发 FSWD、FSWDBS 和 GSWD,在不同病因的癫痫中表现为发作间期或发作期 EAs。在长时间的脑电图记录中,发作间期 EA 可能会以 GSWD 的形式出现在 NREM 睡眠中;但是,它们之间的独立关联还需要在更大样本的研究中进行评估。此外,还需要进行具有足够样本量的前瞻性队列研究。
Utility of Various Activation Procedures in Provoking Ictal and Interictal Patterns, during Routine Electroencephalogram (rEEG) Recording.
Background: Activation procedures (APs) are adopted during routine electroencephalography (rEEG) to provoke interictal epileptiform abnormalities (EAs). This study aimed to observe interictal and ictal (EAs) of different EEG patterns, provoked by various APs.
Methodology: This cross-sectional study was performed in the neurology department of King Fahd hospital of university, Saudi Arabia. The EEGs and medical records of patients who presented for EEG recordings were screened initially, then 146 EEGs provoked EAs due to utilization of APs, were included for analysis.
Results: Among all EEGs with provoked EAs, Non-rapid eye movement sleep (NREM) provoked EAs in 93 (63.7%) patients with following patterns, focal spike wave discharges (FSWDs) 45 (P= 0.01), focal spike wave discharges with bilateral synchrony (FSWDBS) 27 (P=0.03) and generalized spike wave discharges (GSWDs) 46 (P=0.01). Intermittent photic stimulation (IPS) most significantly provoked FSWDs in 07 patient (P =0.01) and GSWDs in 30 patients (P=<0.001) 7 patients (P = 0.01) and GSWDs in 30 patients (P < 0.001). Hyperventilation (HV) was associated with a higher occurrence of GSWDs in 37 patients (P =0.01). Female sex 7 (P = 0.02), provoked GSWDs 3 (P = 0.03), NREM sleep 8 (P = 0.04), prolonged EEG record 3 (P = 0.02), clinical events during recording 5 (P ≤ 0.01), diagnosis of genetic 05 (P = 0.03), and immune-mediated epilepsies 2 (P = 0.001) were associated with the provocation of ictal EAs; however, in multiple logistic regression analysis, no statistically significant association of these variables (P ≥ 0.05 each) was noted.
Conclusion: The provocation of EAs in rEEG with different APs varies according to circumstances, including seizure types, epilepsy etiology, and the type of AP applied. These clinical and procedural parameters affect the diagnostic yield of rEEG and need careful consideration during rEEG recordings. APs adopted during rEEG recording can induce FSWDs, FSWDBS, and GSWDs in the form of either interictal or ictal EAs in various etiologies of epilepsy. Ictal EAs may appear in the form of GSWDs, during NREM sleep, in prolonged EEG records; however, their independent association needs to be evaluated in larger sample studies. Further, prospective cohort studies with adequate sample sizes are warranted.
期刊介绍:
The Annals of African Medicine is published by the Usmanu Danfodiyo University Teaching Hospital, Sokoto, Nigeria and the Annals of African Medicine Society. The Journal is intended to serve as a medium for the publication of research findings in the broad field of Medicine in Africa and other developing countries, and elsewhere which have relevance to Africa. It will serve as a source of information on the state of the art of Medicine in Africa, for continuing education for doctors in Africa and other developing countries, and also for the publication of meetings and conferences. The journal will publish articles I any field of Medicine and other fields which have relevance or implications for Medicine.